Cited by 18Bone health and osteoporosis researchPain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Effects of analgesics on bone mineral density: a longitudinal analysis of the prospective SWAN cohort with three-group matching weights

Open access
Yoshida, Kazuki, Yu, Zhi, Greendale, Gail A., Ruppert, Kristine, Lian, Yinjuan, Tedeschi, Sara K., Lin, Tzu‐Chieh, Haneuse, Sebastien +3 more·2018·Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effects of analgesics on bone mineral density (BMD), which have not been examined in a longitudinal study with multiple measurements. Methods: We investigated changes in BMD associated with new use of analgesics in a prospective longitudinal cohort of mid‐life women. BMD and medication use were measured annually. We compared BMD among new users of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and opioids. Adjustment for baseline covariates was conducted through propensity score matching weights. On‐treatment analysis was conducted with inverse probability of censoring weights. Analysis based on the initial treatment group was also conducted to provide insights into selection bias. Repeated BMD measurements were examined with generalized estimating equations. Results: We identified 71 acetaminophen new users, 659 NSAID new users, and 84 opioid new users among 2365 participants. In the on‐treatment analysis, the opioid group in comparison to the acetaminophen group had an additional average BMD decline of −0.06% [−1.24, 1.11] per year in the spine and −0.45% [−1.51, 0.61] per year in the femoral neck. BMD mean trajectories over time suggested a fifth‐year decline in the opioid persistent users compared with other 2 groups. In the initial treatment group analysis, all 3 groups showed similar trajectories. Conclusion: The BMD decline over time was similar among the 3 groups. However, 5 years of continuous opioid use may be associated with a greater BMD decline than 5 years on other analgesics. Further studies examining the relationship between very long‐term persistent opioid use and BMD are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.4362

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a prospective longitudinal nationwide study of mid-life women, opioid users had a more pronounced BMD decline over 5 years compared with users of acetaminophen and NSAIDs.

    “A prospective longitudinal nationwide study of mid-life women assessed the impact of different analgesics (acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids] on bone mass and reported a more pronounced BMD decline over 5 years in opioid users (237).”

    From Exogenous Opioids and the Human Endocrine System: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement (2024) · cites this paper as [237]

    The Methods describe a prospective cohort of mid-life women recruited at eight U.S. sites. The Results and Discussion say the on-treatment analysis suggested greater BMD decline in opioid users after five years of continuous use, but the group differences were not statistically significant; the initial-treatment-group analysis showed similar trajectories. The claim overstates this tentative finding as an observed greater decline in opioid users generally. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshida, K., Yu, Z., Greendale, G. A., Ruppert, K., Lian, Y., Tedeschi, S. K., Lin, T., Haneuse, S., Glynn, R. J., Hernández‐Díaz, S., & Solomon, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston MA USA
Corresponding author
Yoshida, Kazuki
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-12
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
182-190
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W2772513731
Cited by
18
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • United States National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and the National Institute of Health Office of Research on Women's Health (U01NR004061, U01AG012505, U01AG012535, U01AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012546, U01AG012553, U01AG012554, U01AG012495)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
analgesics, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, opioids, paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, middle-aged women, bone loss, persistent opioid use
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Body Weight, Female, Femur Neck, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Pain, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Bone Density, Body Mass Index, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Osteoporotic Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review