Cited by 9Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UsePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Commentary on “methodologic limitations of prescription opioid safety research and recommendations for improving the evidence base”.

Staffa, Judy, Meyer, Tamra, Secora, Alex, McAninch, Jana·2019·Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.4650

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staffa, J., Meyer, T., Secora, A., & McAninch, J.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Staffa, Judy
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
13-15
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W2891232466
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
prescription opioids, opioid safety, evidence base, opioid analgesics
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, Prescriptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review