The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medication use and risk of falls
Abstract
Purpose: Injuries due to falls are an important public health concern, particularly for the elderly, and effective prevention is an ongoing endeavour. The present study has two related objectives: (1) to describe associations between drug use and falls in an institutionalized population, and (2) to identify a high risk subgroup within the larger population. Methods: The initial analysis was based on a population of 227 residents who were followed over a 1‐year period. Logistic regression techniques were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of the association of falls and drug use. The study of potential ‘high‐risk’ groups employed a case–crossover design to estimate the risk of falling associated with starting a new drug course. Results: Relatively weak ORs for risk of falling were observed for various drug classes; the highest OR was for benzodiazepines (BZD) at OR=1.8Statistically significant at p < 0.05. (unadjusted). Residents taking multiple drugs were at particular risk for falling, e.g. an OR of 6.1 for those using 10+ drugs. The case–crossover analysis indicated that residents starting a new BZD/antipsychotic were at very high risk (OR = 11.4) for experiencing a fall. Conclusions: Residents who took many different types of medications, as well as residents starting a new BZD/antipsychotics were at greatly increased risk of falling. These are high risk groups where increased monitoring or adjustments to drug regimens could lead to prevention of falls. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Cited by
Meta-analysis of the Impact of 9 Medication Classes on Falls in Elderly Persons
Woolcott, J. C. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.357 · Cited by 1,326
Sedative hypnotics in older people with insomnia: meta-analysis of risks and benefits
Glass, J., Lanctôt, K. L., Herrmann, N., Sproule, B. A., & Busto, U. E. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38623.768588.47 · Cited by 1,161
Avidan, A. Y., Fries, B. E., James, M. L., Szafara, K. L., Wright, G. T., & Chervin, R. D. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53304.x · Cited by 343
Benzodiazepines, Z-drugs and the risk of hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Donnelly, K., Bracchi, R., Hewitt, J., Routledge, P. A., & Carter, B. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174730 · Cited by 225
The Epidemiology of Long-Term Benzodiazepine Use
Neutel, C. I. (2005) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260500071863 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Neutel, C. I., Perry, S., & Maxwell, C.
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-104
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W2164131755
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.