The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age
Open accessAbstract
This research proposes a methodology for the development of learning objects (LO). This methodology intends to identify and provide a solution for obstacles related to LOs’ development in the current market. \n \nA review of the state of the art methodologies in Ibero-America and an interview process conducted with professionals from Dirección Nacional de Innovación Académica branch (DNIA) in Universidad Nacional de Colombia, allowed to identify a list of desirable characteristics which served as the base for the definition of the methodology. The proposed methodology includes six main processes: Scripting, Segmentation, Software Production, Audiovisual Production, Assembly and Deployment. \n \nBesides, a software prototype was developed to support the software production process defined in the methodology. In order to define the prototype’s requirements, a comparative analysis of Rapid E-Learning authoring tools was conducted. By comparing these tools and identifying the benefits and improvement opportunities related to their use, a list of desired features was selected and applied for the prototype’s construction. \n \nBoth the methodology and the prototype were tested successfully through their use during the development of two objects of DNIA’s responsibility. It was also validated that both the methodology and the prototype fulfill each of the guidelines and features selected as part of their definition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy
Wiley, D. A. (2000) · Cited by 1,845
Enabling technology for knowledge sharing
Neches, R. T., Fikes, R. E., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R. S., Senator, T. E., & Swartout, W. (1991) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v12i3.902 · Cited by 1,330
Schwaber, K. (1997) · Business Object Design and Implementation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11 · Cited by 868
Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects
Paper, P. R., Polsani, P. R., & References, K. F. (2003) · Texas Digital Library (University of Texas) · Cited by 671
Learning objects: A practical definition
McGreal, R. (2004) · AUSpace (Athabasca University) · Cited by 265
The sharable content object reference model (SCORM) - a critical review
Bohl, O., Scheuhase, J., Sengler, R., & Winand, U. (2003) · International Conference on Computers in Education · doi:10.1109/cie.2002.1186122 · Cited by 151
Davis, A. L. (2013) · College & Research Libraries News · doi:10.5860/crln.74.4.8934 · Cited by 149
Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2015
Aldrich, C. (2015) · Cited by 139
What Every Engineer Should Know about Software Engineering
Laplante, P. A. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420006742 · Cited by 107
Cited by
The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002 · Cited by 2,240
E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis
Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753018785180 · Cited by 658
Yang, Y.-T. C., Chuang, Y.-C., Li, L.-Y., & Tseng, S.-S. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.012 · Cited by 147
Systematic Literature Review of E-Learning Capabilities to Enhance Organizational Learning
Giannakos, M. N., Mikalef, P., & Pappas, I. O. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10097-2 · Cited by 141
Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach
Department of Computer and Robotics Education, U. O. N., Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., Department of Computer and Robotics Education, U. O. N., Obi, C. A., & Department of Business Education, U. O. N. (2019) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenberg, M. J., & Foshay, R.
- Venue
- Performance Improvement
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 50-51
- ISSN
- 1090-8811 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-8272
- OpenAlex
- W2105284042
- Cited by
- 2,070
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 188.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pfi.4140410512
- The paper
- Rosenberg, M. J., & Foshay, R. (2002). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Performance Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140410512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
