Cited by 118Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach

Open access
Department of Computer and Robotics Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria, Ogbonna, Chinyere Grace, Ibezim, Nnenna Ekpereka, Department of Computer and Robotics Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria, Obi, Chiaka Augusta, Department of Business Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria·2019·South African Journal of Education

Abstract

Word processing is a fundamental skill for efficient computer literacy. E-learning has been introduced to ensure wide dissemination of such fundamental content and skills, even beyond school. However, best methodologies need to be identified for efficient instructional delivery. This study therefore investigated the effects of synchronous and asynchronous e-learning on students’ cognitive academic achievement and practical skills acquisition in word processing. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design using a pre-test, post test, and non-equivalent and non-randomized grouping of two groups of students. The study revealed that both synchronous and asynchronous e-learning significantly increased students’ achievement and skills acquisition in word processing irrespective of the gender of the students. However, students taught through the asynchronous mode displayed higher cognitive achievement while those taught through the synchronous e-learning mode displayed improved skills acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students acquire practical skills (e.g., mathematical problem-solving) better when they are taught in a synchronous online setting, as compared to an asynchronous online setting.

    “Of particular note in the field of post-graduate mathematics teachings were the findings of Nsa et al. (2012) and Ogbonna et al. (2019), who found that students acquire practical skills (e.g., mathematical problem-solving) better when they are taught in a synchronous online setting, as compared to an asynchronous online setting.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

52 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Department of Computer and Robotics Education, U. O. N., Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., Department of Computer and Robotics Education, U. O. N., Obi, C. A., & Department of Business Education, U. O. N.
Affiliations
University of Nigeria (NG)
Venue
South African Journal of Education
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0256-0100 (ISSN-L)
  • 2076-3433
OpenAlex
W2950474045
Cited by
118
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11
FWCI
47.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • South African Journal of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
synchronous online learning, asynchronous online learning, word processing, computer literacy, cognitive achievement, practical skills development, instructional delivery methods, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review