Principles of instructional design, 5th edition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using Instructional Design Process to Improve Design and Development of Internet Interventions
Hilgart, M. M., Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., & Kinzie, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1890 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Shyr, W.-J., Wei, B.-L., & Liang, Y.-C. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16052015 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Khalil, H., Al-Maawali, W., & El-Ghool, R. (2022) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2022.100403 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The development of augmented reality framework to enhance students’ motivation
Zain, F. M., Kasim, M., Rahman, F. A., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v20i1.21294
- Authors
- Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Southwest Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, James D.
- ORCID
- Keller, John M.
- Venue
- Performance Improvement
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 44-46
- ISSN
- 1090-8811 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-8272
- OpenAlex
- W2057696512
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Performance Improvement Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- instructional design, teaching principles, employee training, performance improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
