Evaluating Students’ Acceptance Intention of Augmented Reality in Automation Systems Using the Technology Acceptance Model
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the factors influencing the acceptance of augmented reality among students within an automation system. The researchers of this study adopted the technology acceptance model (TAM) and gathered data to examine the path relationships among key variables: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward use, and behavioral intention to use, all of which impact system acceptance. A survey was administered to students to gauge their perspectives on integrating augmented reality into the automation system. The study sample consisted of 41 students enrolled in the automation system course where augmented reality was utilized in teaching. Utilizing the partial least square approach, the hypothesis model was analyzed. The results revealed a lack of significant correlation between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in relation to augmented reality usage. However, perceived ease of use positively influences students’ behavioral intention to use, while perceived usefulness significantly affects behavioral intention to use through augmented reality. Notably, perceived usefulness exhibits a significant relationship with both behavioral intention to use and attitude toward use in the context of augmented reality usage. Moreover, perceived ease of use positively affects attitude toward use for students within the context of automation systems with augmented reality. Furthermore, no significant relationships were observed between attitude toward use and behavioral intention to use, nor between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness regarding augmented reality usage. This study offers valuable insights for educators in the field of engineering and technology who are engaged in training and sustainability development programs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings are consistent with the original TAM and previous AR technology acceptance studies.
“These findings were consistent with the original TAM [49] and previous AR technology acceptance studies [89,90].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479 · see citing works
Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory
Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151718 · Cited by 4,516 · see citing works
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 · Cited by 2,463 · see citing works
e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction
(2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119239086 · Cited by 1,444 · see citing works
Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Huizenga, J. C., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S. F., & Dam, G. T. M. T. (2009) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00316.x · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems
Pai, F., & Huang, K.-I. (2010) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.007 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning
Admiraal, W., Huizenga, J. C., Akkerman, S. F., & Dam, G. T. M. T. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.013 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Principles of instructional design, 5th edition
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005) · Performance Improvement · doi:10.1002/pfi.4140440211 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Lee, W., Xiong, L., & Hu, C. (2011) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.018 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Overview and Evolution of the ADDIE Training System
Allen, W. C. (2006) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422306292942 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Augmented reality system for operator support in human–robot collaborative assembly
Makris, S., Karagiannis, P., Koukas, S., & Matthaiakis, A.-S. (2016) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.038 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Huang, H., & Liaw, S.-S. (2018) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Teo, T. (2010) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Park, Y., Son, H., & Kim, C. (2011) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
A new way of teaching business ethics: The evaluation of virtual reality-based learning media
Sholihin, M., Sari, R. C., Yuniarti, N., & Ilyana, S. (2020) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100428 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Adoption of augmented reality technology by university students
Almenara, J. C., Fernández‐Batanero, J. M., & Osuna, J. B. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01597 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Chang, C., Sung, H., Guo, J., Chang, B.-Y., & Kuo, F.-R. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1661854 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K‐12 education
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. G. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13114 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Augmented reality smart glasses in industrial assembly: Current status and future challenges
Danielsson, O., Holm, M., & Syberfeldt, A. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2020.100175 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Enhancing Students’ Biology Learning by Using Augmented Reality as a Learning Supplement
Weng, C., Otanga, S., Christianto, S. M., & Chu, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633119884213 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
A virtual reality role-playing serious game for experiential learning
Alrehaili, E. A., & Osman, H. A. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1703008 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Cheng, Y.-M., Lou, S.-J., Kuo, S.-H., & Shih, R.-C. (2013) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.65 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Akman, E., & Çakır, R. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1841800 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Costa, G. D. M., Petry, M. R., & Moreira, A. P. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22072725 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality
Chien, Y.-C., Su, Y.-N., Wu, T., & Huang, Y. (2017) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Older Adults' Acceptance of Information Technology
Wang, L., Rau, P.-L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2011) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2010.500588 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Augmented reality technology adoption: Case of a mobile application in Turkey
Yavuz, M., ÇORBACIOĞLU, E., Başoğlu, N., Daim, T. U., & Shaygan, A. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101598 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Yu, S.-J., Hsueh, Y.-L., Sun, J. C.-Y., & Liu, H.-Z. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100030 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Wang, X.-M., Hu, Q.-N., Hwang, G.-J., & Yu, X.-H. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2057549 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Hsu, H.-F., Wong, W.-T., & Chen, M.-Y. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.011 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Personality and enjoyment of computer game play
Fang, X., & Zhao, F. (2010) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.005 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
An empirical examination of application frameworks success based on technology acceptance model
Polančič, G., Heričko, M., & Rozman, I. (2009) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.036 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Astuti, T. N., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2019) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2020.13110a · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Amores-Valencia, A., Burgos, D., & Branch, J. W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011409 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Assessing the emotional impact of virtual reality-based teacher training
Stavroulia, K. E., Christofi, M., Baka, E., Michael‐Grigoriou, D., Magnenat‐Thalmann, N., & Lanitis, A. (2019) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-11-2018-0127 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model & realidad aumentada: estudio en desarrollo
de Sevilla, U., Almenara, J. C., Osuna, J. B., de Sevilla, U., Cejudo, M. D. C. L., & de Sevilla, U. (2016) · Revista Lasallista de Investigación · doi:10.22507/rli.v13n2a2 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Augmented and virtual reality in apparel industry: a bibliometric review and future research agenda
Goel, P., Mahadevan, K., & Punjani, K. K. (2022) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-10-2021-0202 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Kırıkkaya, E. B., & Başgül, M. (2019) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/19.18.362 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Mailizar, M., & Johar, R. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2021.14243a · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Smart Pedagogy as a Driving Wheel for Technology-Enhanced Learning
Daniela, L. (2021) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09536-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Technological and Pedagogical Convergence between Work-based and Campus-based Learning
Radcliffe, D. F. (2002) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Mobile Augmented Reality Applications in Teaching: A Proposed Technology Acceptance Model
Koutromanos, G., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2021) · International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) · doi:10.23919/ilrn52045.2021.9459343 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
THE POTENTIAL OF AUGMENTED REALITY IN DYNAMIC GEOMETRY EDUCATION
Kaufmann, H. (2006) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Bonk, C. J. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118269381 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cognitive assessment of game‐based learning
Kearney, P. R. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00718.x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Stojšić, I., Ostojić, N., & Stanisavljević, J. (2022) · International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education · doi:10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-129-138 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Influence of Augmented Reality (AR) on the Motivation of High School Students
Amores-Valencia, A., Burgos, D., & Branch, J. W. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12224715 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Energy management competency development based on the internet of things (IOT)
Shyr, W. J., Chiou, C.-F., Yang, F. C., & Li, P. C. (2017) · International journal of engineering education · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationAsad, M. M., Sherwani, F., Hassan, R., Sahito, Z., & Khan, N. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Design and Technology · doi:10.1108/jedt-08-2020-0330 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Improving Adoption of Immersive Technologies at a Norwegian University
Estrada, J. G., & Prasolova‐Førland, E. (2022) · International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) · doi:10.23919/ilrn55037.2022.9815954 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Science
(2021) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6490-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Abdallah, I.; Dertimanis, V.; Mylonas, H.; Tatsis, K.; Chatzi, E.; Dervilis, N.; Worden, K.; Maguire, E. Fault diagnosis of wind turbine structures using decision tree learning algorithms with big data. In Safety and Reliability-Safe Societies in a Changing World; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 3053-3061.
- Wan, Z.; Wan, Y.; Tengku, B.S.; Tengku, Y.; Noniwati, A. Evaluating student's acceptance of google classroom in co-curricular photography course using technology acceptance model (TAM). Int. J. Technol. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2023, 4, 28-34.
- Cabero-Almenara, J.; Barroso-Osuna, J.; Llorente Cejudo, M.d.C. Technology Acceptance Model & augmented reality: Study in progress. Rev. Lasallista Investig. 2016, 13, 18-26.
- Asad, M.M.; Hassan, R.B.; Sherwani, E.F. Instructional models for enhancing the performance of students and workforce during educational training. Acad. Arena 2014, 6, 27-31.
- Hair, F.; Black, C.; Babin, J.; Anderson, E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: London, UK, 2014.
- Lai, C.M.; Huang, H.M.; Liaw, S.S.; Huang, W.W. A study of user's acceptance on three dimensional virtual reality applied in medical education. Bull. Educ. Psychol. 2009, 40, 341-362.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naveen, L., Khan, M. I., Saleh, A., & Subudhi, R. N. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108558 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Integrando IA en los Nuevos Paradigmas de las Ciencias Económicas y Gestión Empresarial
Avelino, J. R. D., Casanova-Villalba, C. I., Barragán, C. E. C., Jiménez, M. G. C., Herrera-Sánchez, M. J., & Zambrano-Muñoz, C. K. (2024) · Editorial Grupo AEA eBooks · doi:10.55813/egaea.l.78 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Oyundari, B., Yondon, C., Enkhbat, R., Darkhijav, B., & Rahman, M. (2025) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-025-00504-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Talero-Sarmiento, L. H., Capdevila, M., Granollers, T., Lamos-Diaz, H., & Rodrigues, K. A. P. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8060069 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Park, S.-W., Lee, S., & Sung, K.-J. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su172310476 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“These cases confirm the centrality of usability and system reliability in technology acceptance, echoing findings that PEU and self-efficacy are key determinants of digital engagement [36,37].”
Bačnar, D., Barić, D., & Ogrizović, D. (2025) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi8030084 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Koparan, B. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17136172 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Many studies further indicate that AR applications attract children’s attention, provide enjoyable and realistic learning experiences [66,124,133,134], enhance motivation and learning outcomes [61,62], and support easier acquisition of abstract concepts by reducing learning difficulties [135,136].”
Chou, C.-M., Shen, T.-C., & Shen, T.-C. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13469-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“According to a Harris Interactive Survey, 92% of teachers are willing to adopt educational technology (EdTech) in the classroom, while 96% of teachers believe that Edtech can increase student participation in learning (Asiri & Elaasar, 2022; Bansah & Agyei, 2022; Shyr et al., 2024).”
InfluentialSun, Z., Li, Y., & Gao, S. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14100895 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Shyr (2024) demonstrated that perceived usefulness positively affects students’ attitudes toward accepting augmented reality in automated systems [11].”
BackgroundAyaichi, L., Amaaz, A., & Mouradi, A. (2025) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/25.24.611 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Unraveling the dynamics of online learning engagement: a Cambodian perspective
Ly, R., & Ly, B. (2025) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-025-09401-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Shyr et al. (2024) confirm the influence of PU and PEU on students’ intentions to use augmented reality, though PEU and PU did not correlate significantly.”
Integrating Generative AI in Active Learning: A Case Study in Project Management Education
Koivisto, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09908-2_28 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
ICT Adoption in Indonesian’s Houses of Representative: TAM Analysis and Lessons From UK Parliament
Ardiyanti, H. (2024) · Jurnal Pekommas · doi:10.56873/jpkm.v9i2.5581 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhou, Z., Zhou, Y., Ouyang, B., Man, S. S., & Chan, A. H. S. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14131978
“These findings were consistent with the original TAM [49] and previous AR technology acceptance studies [89,90].”
Subudhi, R. N., Naveen, L., Saleh, A., & Khan, M. I. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5086458
Development of Prototype Automatic Sensor Roll-Up/Down with Alarm System
Araw*, L. V. A. (2025) · Australian Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology · doi:10.34104/ajpab.025.01500159
“The study aligned with Shyr et al. (2024), who assessed the variables affecting students' acceptance of augmented reality in an automated system.”
Bridging Career Gaps Using AI-Driven Career Pathways and Engaging Augmented Reality Simulations
Sohana, R., Niharika, R., Shah, K., Singh, T., & Parveen, M. S. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06662-6_19
Teachers’ Perception, Knowledge, and Attitude on Augmented Reality: A Survey Study
Yusni, P. D. I. M., & Sani, Z. H. A. (2025) · International Conference on Advances in Machine Intelligence and Cybersecurity Technologies (AMICT) · doi:10.1109/amict65811.2025.11402663
“Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of AR in enhancing students' motivation, engagement, and academic outcomes [3, 4].”
InfluentialSukirman, Nurcahyanto, G., Astuti, R. D., Hermawan, H. D., Untari, R. S., Hasanah, F. N., Mustofa, R. H., Adhisa, R. R., & Hidayati, I. A. (2025) · International Conference on Information System & Information Technology (ICISIT) · doi:10.1109/icisit66233.2025.11402988
“All items were adapted and modified from previous studies on AR adoption in education to suit the context of the Cell Explorer app [8], [9].”
InfluentialIntegration of Augmented Reality in Hybrid Learning: Student Perceptions and Acceptance
Mantasia, Suryani, H., Suhaeb, S., Sukma, I., & Jaya, H. (2026) · International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) · doi:10.3991/ijoe.v22i03.58887
Li, X., Miza, T. F. B. S., Saiful, S. S. N., Rao, G. K. L., Ridzuan, F., Hashim, H., Ismail, Z., Zakaria, N., & Mokhtar, N. B. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08004-3
“PEOU is consistently rated positively by students in digital and AR learning environments, indicating that users generally find these systems navigable and manageable [20, 46].”
Mokalu, Y. B., Paat, M., Sutopo, H., Paat, W. R. L., & Wurarah, M. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3788149.3788180
Cui, D., Mousas, C., Seo, K., & Yao, S. (2026) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres.a.449
Technology Adaptation Capacity of Pedagogical Students in Vietnam
Nguyen, N. V., Le, H. T., Ngo, N.-Q.-N., Nguyen, N. T. L., & Tran, H. V. (2026) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1742-7_16
Man, S.-S., Wang, J.-Y., Liang, Z.-Y., Wang, Y., & Chan, A. H. S. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2736802
Chen, J., Shang, Y., & Sun, C. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01206
- Authors
- Shyr, W.-J., Wei, B.-L., & Liang, Y.-C.
- Affiliations
- National Changhua University of Education (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Shyr, Wen-Jye
- ORCID
- Shyr, Wen-Jye
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-02-29
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392294880
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- augmented reality, technology acceptance, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, behavioral intention, engineering students, educational technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
