Cited by 18Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

New Food and Drug Administration–Approved and Emerging Novel Treatment Options for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Click, Zach R., Seddon, Amanda N., Bae, Young R., Fisher, Justin D., Ogunniyi, Adebayo·2018·Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy

Abstract

Advancements in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been sparse during the past several decades, and the disease continues to have a poor prognosis. However, in 2017 alone, four new medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of AML reached the market. Midostaurin, liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin, enasidenib, and gemtuzumab ogozamicin all showed benefit in respective clinical trials to gain approval for the treatment of AML in various patient populations. Additionally, many phase II and III clinical trials are currently ongoing to assess the safety and efficacy of other potential therapies for the treatment of AML. In this review, we summarize the results of the landmark clinical trials associated with the newly approved agents as well as the current ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of AML. A literature search was performed to retrieve data on agents currently being studied for use. Although the overall prognosis for patients with AML remains poor, the addition of the newly FDA‐approved medications is a step in the right direction for a disease state that has proved difficult to treat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/phar.2180

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Click, Z. R., Seddon, A. N., Bae, Y. R., Fisher, J. D., & Ogunniyi, A.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Click, Zach R.
Venue
Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-17
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
1143-1154
ISSN
  • 0277-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9114
OpenAlex
W2890607923
Cited by
18
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, FDA-approved drugs, midostaurin, enasidenib, clinical trials, prognostic outcome
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Drug Approval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review