The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells
Open accessAbstract
The potential for new 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐junction solar cell architectures to reach 50% efficiency is highly leveraging for the economics of concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) systems.The theoretical performance of such next‐generation cells, and experimental results for 3‐ and 4‐junction CPV cells, are examined here to evaluate their impact for real‐world solar electricity generation. Semiconductor device physics equations are formulated in terms of the band gap‐voltage offset Woc (Eg/q) − Voc, to give a clearer physical understanding and more general analysis of the multiple subcell band gaps in multijunction cells. Band gap‐voltage offset is shown experimentally to be largely independent of band gap E g for a wide range of metamorphic and lattice‐matched semiconductors from 0.67 to 2.1 eV. Its theoretical E g dependence is calculated from that of the radiative recombination coefficient, and at a more fundamental level using the Shockley‐Queisser detailed balance model, bearing out experimental observations. Energy production of 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐junction CPV cells, calculated for changing air mass and spectrum over the course of the day, is found to be significantly greater than for conventional 3‐junction cells. The spectral sensitivity of these next‐generation cell designs is fairly low, and is outweighed by their higher efficiency. Lattice‐matched GaInP/GaInAs/Ge cells have reached an independently confirmed efficiency of 41.6%, the highest efficiency yet demonstrated for any type of solar cell. Light I‐V measurements of this record 41.6% cell, of next‐generation upright metamorphic 3‐junction cells with 40% target production efficiency, and of experimental 4‐junction CPV cells are presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-efficiency polymer solar cells with small photon energy loss
Kawashima, K., Tamai, Y., Ohkita, H., Osaka, I., & Takimiya, K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10085 · Cited by 391
Thermophotovoltaic efficiency of 40%
LaPotin, A., Schulte, K. L., Steiner, M. A., Buznitsky, K., Kelsall, C. C., Friedman, D. J., Tervo, E. J., France, R. M., Young, M. R., Rohskopf, A., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04473-y · Cited by 336
1.73 eV AlGaAs/InGaP heterojunction solar cell grown by MBE with 18.7% efficiency
Ben Slimane, A., Michaud, A., Mauguin, O., Lafosse, X., Bercegol, A., Lombez, L., Harmand, J., & Collin, S. (2020) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/pip.3249 · Cited by 13
>35% 5-junction space solar cells based on the direct bonding technique
Li, X., Li, G., Lu, H., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Journal of Semiconductors · doi:10.1088/1674-4926/42/12/122701 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- King, R. R., Bhusari, D., Boca, A., Larrabee, D., Liu, X. ‐., Hong, W., Fetzer, C. M., Law, D. C., & Karam, N. H.
- Venue
- Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 797-812
- ISSN
- 1062-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-159X
- OpenAlex
- W2026071941
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pip.1044
- The paper
- King, R. R., Bhusari, D., Boca, A., Larrabee, D., Liu, X. ‐., Hong, W., Fetzer, C. M., Law, D. C., & Karam, N. H. (2011). Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.