The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A manufacturing cost estimation method with uncertainty analysis and its application to perovskite on glass photovoltaic modules
Open accessAbstract
Manufacturing cost analysis is becoming an increasingly important tool in the photovoltaics industry to identify research areas that need attention and enable progress towards cost reduction targets. We describe a method to estimate manufacturing cost that is suitable for use during an early stage of technology development, delivering both the manufacturing cost estimate as well as an uncertainty analysis that quickly highlights the opportunities for greatest cost improvement. We apply the technique to three process sequences for the large‐scale production of organic‐inorganic hybrid perovskite photovoltaic modules. A process sequence that combines two demonstrated perovskite module sequences is estimated to cost $107/m 2 (uncertainty range $87 to 140/m 2), comparable with commercial crystalline silicon and cadmium telluride technologies (on a US $/m 2 basis). A levelized cost of electricity calculation shows that this perovskite technology would be competitive in 2015 with incumbent photovoltaic technologies if a module power conversion efficiency of 18% and lifetime of 20 years can be achieved. Further analysis shows that even if the cost of the active layers and rear electrode were reduced to zero, a module power conversion efficiency of 18% and lifetime of 20 years would be required to meet the 2020 SunShot levelized cost of electricity targets. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, H.-S., Lee, C.-R., Im, J.-H., Lee, K.-B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J.-H., Moser, J. E., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00591 · Cited by 8,092
Cited by
A Review of Perovskites Solar Cell Stability
Wang, R., Mujahid, M., Duan, Y., Wang, Z., Xue, J., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201808843 · Cited by 1,310
Opportunities and challenges for tandem solar cells using metal halide perovskite semiconductors
Leijtens, T., Bush, K. A., Prasanna, R., & McGehee, M. D. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0190-4 · Cited by 1,121
Technology and Market Perspective for Indoor Photovoltaic Cells
Mathews, I., Kantareddy, S. N., Buonassisi, T., & Peters, I. M. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.026 · Cited by 567
Jošt, M., Kegelmann, L., Korte, L., & Albrecht, S. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201904102 · Cited by 538
Hawash, Z., Ono, L. K., & Qi, Y. (2018) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.201700623 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, N. L., Yi Ho‐Baillie, A. W., Basore, P. A., Young, T. L., Evans, R., & Egan, R. J.
- Venue
- Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-24
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 390-405
- ISSN
- 1062-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-159X
- OpenAlex
- W2589600251
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A manufacturing cost estimation method with uncertainty analysis and its application to perovskite on glass photovoltaic modules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pip.2871
- The paper
- Chang, N. L., Yi Ho‐Baillie, A. W., Basore, P. A., Young, T. L., Evans, R., & Egan, R. J. (2017). A manufacturing cost estimation method with uncertainty analysis and its application to perovskite on glass photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.