The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The results of performance measurements of field‐aged crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules
Abstract
This paper presents the results of electrical performance measurements of 204 crystalline silicon‐wafer based photovoltaic modules following long‐term continuous outdoor exposure. The modules comprise a set of 53 module types originating from 20 different producers, all of which were originally characterized at the European Solar Test Installation (ESTI), over the period 1982–1986. The modules represent diverse generations of PV technologies, different encapsulation and substrate materials. The modules electrical performance was determined according to the standards IEC 60891 and the IEC 60904 series, electrical insulation tests were performed according to the recent IEC 61215 edition 2. Many manufacturers currently give a double power warranty for their products, typically 90% of the initial maximum power after 10 years and 80% of the original maximum power after 25 years. Applying the same criteria (taking into account modules electrical performance only and assuming 2·5% measurement uncertainty of a testing lab) only 17·6% of modules failed (35 modules out of 204 tested). Remarkably even if we consider the initial warranty period i.e. 10% of P max after 10 years, more than 65·7% of modules exposed for 20 years exceed this criteria. The definition of life time is a difficult task as there does not yet appear to be a fixed catastrophic failure point in module ageing but more of a gradual degradation. Therefore, if a system continues to produce energy which satisfies the user need it has not yet reached its end of life. If we consider this level arbitrarily to be the 80% of initial power then all indications from the measurements and observations made in this paper are that the useful lifetime of solar modules is not limited to the commonly assumed 20 year. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commonly observed degradation in field-aged photovoltaic modules
Quintana, M. A., King, D. L., McMahon, T. J., & Osterwald, C. R. (2003) · Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002. · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2002.1190879 · Cited by 291
Cited by
Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review
Jordan, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2013) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/pip.1182 · Cited by 1,529
Degradations of silicon photovoltaic modules: A literature review
Ndiaye, A., Charki, A., Kobi, A., Kébé, C. M. F., Ndiaye, P. A., & Sambou, V. (2013) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2013.07.005 · Cited by 536
Cost Analysis of Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaics
Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Sun, Y., Zhao, Z., Li, Y., Zhou, H., & Chen, Q. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.001 · Cited by 429
Bending cyclic load test for crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules
Suzuki, S., Doi, T., Masuda, A., & Tanahashi, T. (2018) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.57.02ce05 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Skoczek, A., Sample, T., & Dunlop, E. D.
- Venue
- Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-24
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 227-240
- ISSN
- 1062-7995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-159X
- OpenAlex
- W2017169905
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.