The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Referral Rates for School Threat Assessment
Abstract
Although behavioral threat assessment and management (often shortened to “threat assessment”) has become widely used in US schools, no studies have systematically examined how frequently schools conduct threat assessments and how threat assessment rates vary as a function of student and school demographics. Of particular concern is that students with disabilities receive threat assessments at disproportionately high rates. This study examined the 1‐year frequency of threat assessments in a statewide sample of 611 elementary, 341 middle, and 269 high schools reporting 15,301 threat assessments, of which 41% concerned students with disabilities. We identified threat assessment rate differences associated with student grade, gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status. We further examined the association between threat assessment rates and school‐level demographic characteristics including racial/ethnic composition, prevalence of economically disadvantaged students, and proportion of students with a disability. To place these results in context, we compared findings for threat assessment with out‐of‐school suspension rates. We discuss reasons why students with disabilities might be referred for BTAM at a high rate and recommend practices for assuring their educational rights and needs are safeguarded. Evolving school threat assessment policies should recognize the practice demands placed on school staff to evaluate a substantial number of students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, schools with supportive climates and well-implemented threat assessment programs can identify threats earlier and reduce the likelihood of violence (Byrd et al., 2025;Cornell et al., 2025).”
From An ounce of prevention: identifying factors associated with whether a school shooting was averted or carried out (2026) · cites this paper as Cornell et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: An evidentiary review and recommendations
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.852 · Cited by 806
Cornell, D. G., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2012.12087378 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.3102/0013189X09357620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/tam0000092 · DOI
- 10.1080/15388220.2019.1694031 · DOI
- Cameron K., 2018, Violent Threat Risk Assessment (VTRA) Protocol: A Community Based Approach
- Cornell D., 2018, Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines
- Cornell D., 2015, Closing the School Discipline Gap: Research for Policymakers, 180
- Cornell D., 2020, Student Threat Assessment as a Safe and Supportive Prevention Strategy: Final Technical Report
- Cornell D., 2024, School Threat Assessment Toolkit
- 10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2 · DOI
- Cornell D. J.Maeng S.Winter et al. Forthcoming. "Behavioral Threat Assessment and Equity in Exclusionary School Discipline."School Psychology Review.https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2025.2457006. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/spq0000220 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192636511415255 · DOI
- 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
- 10.1080/2372966X.2020.1842716 · DOI
- 10.1037/tam0000163 · DOI
- 10.1177/23328584211041354 · DOI
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency & U.S. Secret Service, 2023, Improving School Safety Through Bystander Reporting: A Toolkit for Strengthening
- Fabelo T., 2011, Breaking School Rules: A Statewide Study of How School Discipline Relates to Students’ Success and Juvenile Justice Involvement
- 10.1177/019874291203700303 · DOI
- Florida Department of Education [FLDOE], 2022, Student Discipline Data by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, State and District Levels, 2021‐2022, Final Survey 5
- 10.1007/s10826-019-01407-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/pits.21838 · DOI
- 10.1080/15388220.2012.682010 · DOI
- 10.1080/2372966x.2020.1832865 · DOI
- 10.1037/tam0000204 · DOI
- 10.1080/2331186x.2023.2179863 · DOI
- 10.1177/01987429050310010 · DOI
- 10.1177/1098300708329710 · DOI
- 10.1111/cdev.12690 · DOI
- Maeng J., 2024, Statewide Implementation of School Threat Assessment in Florida: Final Technical Report
- Maeng J. D.Cornell J.Kerere F.Huang T.Konold andK.Afolabi.2023.School Threat Assessment in Florida: Technical Report of 2021‐2022 Case Data. Charlottesville VA: School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia.https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31694.23369. · DOI
- Maeng J. D.Cowley D.Cornell andF.Huang.2024. How Do Schools Support Students After a Threat Assessment? Manuscript under review. · DOI
- 10.1080/15388220.2019.1707682 · DOI
- 10.1093/med-psych/9780190940164.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1090198121107374 · DOI
- Morgan E., 2014, The School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies From the Field to Keep Students Engaged in School and Out of the Juvenile Justice System
- National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2010, Numbers and Types of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools From the Common Core of Data: School Year 2009‐10
- National Threat Assessment Center, 2018, Enhancing School Safety Using a Threat Assessment Model: An Operational Guide for Preventing Targeted School Violence
- 10.1037/tam0000038 · DOI
- O'Toole M. E., 2000, The School Shooter: A Threat Assessment Perspective
- 10.1177/0044118X14528958 · DOI
- 10.1177/0741932519825 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654318791582 · DOI
Cited by
Kapadia, K., Byrd, K., & John, R. S. (2026) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2026.10084
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornell, D. G., Kerere, J., Konold, T., Maeng, J., Afolabi, K., Huang, F., & Cowley, D.
- Affiliations
- School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
- College of Education and Human Development University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
- ORCID
- Cowley, Deanne
- Venue
- Psychology in the Schools
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-01-27
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1294-1305
- ISSN
- 0033-3085
- 1520-6807
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.