CBP60‐DB: An AlphaFold‐predicted plant kingdom‐wide database of the CALMODULIN‐BINDING PROTEIN 60 protein family with a novel structural clustering algorithm
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Molecular genetic analyses in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana have demonstrated the major roles of different CALMODULIN‐BINDING PROTEIN 60 (CBP60) proteins in growth, stress signaling, and immune responses. Prominently, CBP60g and SARD1 are paralogous CBP60 transcription factors that regulate numerous components of the immune system, such as cell surface and intracellular immune receptors, MAP kinases, WRKY transcription factors, and biosynthetic enzymes for immunity‐activating metabolites salicylic acid (SA) and N ‐hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP). However, their function, regulation, and diversification in most species remain unclear. Here, we have created CBP60‐DB ( https://cbp60db.wlu.ca/ ), a structural and bioinformatic database that comprehensively characterized 1052 CBP60 gene homologs (encoding 2376 unique transcripts and 1996 unique proteins) across 62 phylogenetically diverse genomes in the plant kingdom. We have employed deep learning‐predicted structural analyses using AlphaFold2 and then generated dedicated web pages for all plant CBP60 proteins. Importantly, we have generated a novel clustering visualization algorithm to interrogate kingdom‐wide structural similarities for more efficient inference of conserved functions across various plant taxa. Because well‐characterized CBP60 proteins in Arabidopsis are known to be transcription factors with putative calmodulin‐binding domains, we have integrated external bioinformatic resources to analyze protein domains and motifs. Collectively, we present a plant kingdom‐wide identification of this important protein family in a user‐friendly AlphaFold‐anchored database, representing a novel and significant resource for the broader plant biology community.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Increasing the resilience of plant immunity to a warming climate
Kim, J. H., Castroverde, C. D. M., Huang, S., Li, C., Hilleary, R., Seroka, A., Sohrabi, R., Medina-Yerena, D., Huot, B., Wang, J., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04902-y · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Sequence‐similar, structure‐dissimilar protein pairs in the PDB
Kosloff, M., & Kolodny, R. (2008) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21770 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Amani, K., Shivnauth, V., & Castroverde, C. D. M.
- Affiliations
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Amani, Keaun
- Castroverde, Christian Danve M.
- Venue
- Plant Direct
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e509-e509
- ISSN
- 2475-4455 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10331130
- OpenAlex
- W4383695102
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Direct (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2, SARD1, plant immune signaling, transcription factors, plant genome annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review