Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation

Jaffe, Jacob D., Berg, Howard C., Church, George M.·2004·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

The accelerated rate of genomic sequencing has led to an abundance of completely sequenced genomes. Annotation of the open reading frames (ORFs) ( i.e. , gene prediction) in these genomes is an important task and is most often performed computationally based on features in the nucleic acid sequence. Using recent advances in proteomics, we set out to predict the set of ORFs for an organism based principally on expressed protein‐based evidence. Using a novel search strategy, we mapped peptides detected in a whole‐cell lysate of Mycoplasma pneumoniae onto a genomic scaffold and extended these “hits” into ORFs bound by traditional genetic signals to generate a “proteogenomic map”. We were able to generate an ORF model for M. pneumoniae strain FH using proteomic data with a high correlation to models based on sequence features. Ultimately, we detected over 81% of the genomically predicted ORFs in M. pneumoniae strain M129 (the originally sequenced strain). We were also able to detect several new ORFs not originally predicted by genomic methods, various N ‐terminal extensions, and some evidence that would suggest that certain predicted ORFs are bogus. Some of these differences may be a result of the strain analyzed but demonstrate the robustness of protein analysis across closely related genomes. This technique is a cost‐effective means to add value to genome annotation, and a prerequisite for proteome quantitation and in vivo interaction measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200300511

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Jaffe, J. D., Berg, H. C., & Church, G. M.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
59-77
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2021653707
Cited by
357
References
1
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200300511
The paper
Jaffe, J. D., Berg, H. C., & Church, G. M. (2004). Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.