Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,822

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current two‐dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics

Görg, Angelika, Weiss, Walter, Dunn, Michael J.·2004·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DE) with immobilized pH gradients (IPGs) combined with protein identification by mass spectrometry (MS) is currently the workhorse for proteomics. In spite of promising alternative or complementary technologies (e.g. multidimensional protein identification technology, stable isotope labelling, protein or antibody arrays) that have emerged recently, 2‐DE is currently the only technique that can be routinely applied for parallel quantitative expression profiling of large sets of complex protein mixtures such as whole cell lysates. 2‐DE enables the separaration of complex mixtures of proteins according to isoelectric point (p I), molecular mass (Mr), solubility, and relative abundance. Furthermore, it delivers a map of intact proteins, which reflects changes in protein expression level, isoforms or post‐translational modifications. This is in contrast to liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry based methods, which perform analysis on peptides, where Mr and p I information is lost, and where stable isotope labelling is required for quantitative analysis. Today's 2‐DE technology with IPGs (Görg et al., Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1037–1053), has overcome the former limitations of carrier ampholyte based 2‐DE (O'Farrell, J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4007–4021) with respect to reproducibility, handling, resolution, and separation of very acidic and/or basic proteins. The development of IPGs between pH 2.5–12 has enabled the analysis of very alkaline proteins and the construction of the corresponding databases. Narrow‐overlapping IPGs provide increased resolution (δpI = 0.001) and, in combination with prefractionation methods, the detection of low abundance proteins. Depending on the gel size and pH gradient used, 2‐DE can resolve more than 5000 proteins simultaneously (˜2000 proteins routinely), and detect and quantify < 1 ng of protein per spot. In this article we describe the current 2‐DE/MS workflow including the following topics: sample preparation, protein solubilization, and prefractionation; protein separation by 2‐DE with IPGs; protein detection and quantitation; computer assisted analysis of 2‐DE patterns; protein identification and characterization by MS; two‐dimensional protein databases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200401031

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,822

Metadata

Authors
Görg, A., Weiss, W., & Dunn, M. J.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
3665-3685
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2048333869
Cited by
1,822
References
4
FWCI
58.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current two‐dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401031
The paper
Görg, A., Weiss, W., & Dunn, M. J. (2004). Current two‐dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.