The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol
Abstract
While phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAc (cytoplasmic and nuclear glycosylation) are linked to normal and pathological changes in cell states, these post‐translational modifications have been difficult to analyze in proteomic studies. We describe advances in β‐elimination / Michael addition‐based approaches which allow for mass spectrometry‐based identification and comparative quantification of O‐phosphate or O‐GlcNAc‐modified peptides, as well as cysteine‐containing peptides for expression analysis. The method (BEMAD) involves differential isotopic labeling through Michael addition with normal dithiothreitol (DTT) (d0) or deuterated DTT (d6), and enrichment of these peptides by thiol chromatography. BEMAD was comparable to isotope‐coded affinity tags (ICAT; a commercially available differential isotopic quantification technique) in protein expression analysis, but also provided the identity and relative amounts of both O‐phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAc modification sites. Specificity of O‐phosphate vs. O‐GlcNAc mapping is achieved through coupling enzymatic dephosphorylation or O‐GlcNAc hydrolysis with differential isotopic labeling. Blocking of cysteine labeling by prior oxidation of a cytosolic lysate from mouse brain allowed specific targeting of serine / threonine post‐translational modifications as demonstrated through identification of 21 phosphorylation sites (5 previously reported) in a single mass spectrometry analysis. These results demonstate BEMAD is suitable for large‐scale quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Leenders, A. G. M., da Silva, F. H. L., Ghijsen, W. E. J. M., & Verhage, M. (2001) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.12.10.3095 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
β- N -acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is part of the histone code
Sakabe, K., Wang, Z., & Hart, G. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009023107 · Cited by 373
Self-citationHigh-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Vosseller, K., Hansen, K. C., Chalkley, R. J., Trinidad, J. C., Wells, L., Hart, G. W., & Burlingame, A. L.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 388-398
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2017614262
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401066
- The paper
- Vosseller, K., Hansen, K. C., Chalkley, R. J., Trinidad, J. C., Wells, L., Hart, G. W., & Burlingame, A. L. (2005). Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.