Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol

Vosseller, Keith, Hansen, Kirk C., Chalkley, Robert J., Trinidad, Jonathan C., Wells, Lance, Hart, Gerald W., Burlingame, Alma L.·2005·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

While phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAc (cytoplasmic and nuclear glycosylation) are linked to normal and pathological changes in cell states, these post‐translational modifications have been difficult to analyze in proteomic studies. We describe advances in β‐elimination / Michael addition‐based approaches which allow for mass spectrometry‐based identification and comparative quantification of O‐phosphate or O‐GlcNAc‐modified peptides, as well as cysteine‐containing peptides for expression analysis. The method (BEMAD) involves differential isotopic labeling through Michael addition with normal dithiothreitol (DTT) (d0) or deuterated DTT (d6), and enrichment of these peptides by thiol chromatography. BEMAD was comparable to isotope‐coded affinity tags (ICAT; a commercially available differential isotopic quantification technique) in protein expression analysis, but also provided the identity and relative amounts of both O‐phosphorylation and O‐GlcNAc modification sites. Specificity of O‐phosphate vs. O‐GlcNAc mapping is achieved through coupling enzymatic dephosphorylation or O‐GlcNAc hydrolysis with differential isotopic labeling. Blocking of cysteine labeling by prior oxidation of a cytosolic lysate from mouse brain allowed specific targeting of serine / threonine post‐translational modifications as demonstrated through identification of 21 phosphorylation sites (5 previously reported) in a single mass spectrometry analysis. These results demonstate BEMAD is suitable for large‐scale quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200401066

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Vosseller, K., Hansen, K. C., Chalkley, R. J., Trinidad, J. C., Wells, L., Hart, G. W., & Burlingame, A. L.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
388-398
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2017614262
Cited by
161
References
3
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200401066
The paper
Vosseller, K., Hansen, K. C., Chalkley, R. J., Trinidad, J. C., Wells, L., Hart, G. W., & Burlingame, A. L. (2005). Quantitative analysis of both protein expression and serine / threonine post‐translational modifications through stable isotope labeling with dithiothreitol. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.