The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of the human blood plasma proteome
Abstract
We describe methods for broad characterization of the human plasma proteome. The combination of stepwise immunoglobulin G (IgG) and albumin protein depletion by affinity chromatography and ultrahigh‐efficiency capillary liquid chromatography separations coupled to ion trap‐tandem mass spectrometry enabled identification of 2392 proteins from a single plasma sample with an estimated confidence level of > 94%, and an additional 2198 proteins with an estimated confidence level of 80%. The relative abundances of the identified proteins span a range of over eight orders of magnitude in concentration (< 30 pg/mL to ∼30 mg/mL), facilitated by the attomole‐level sensitivity of the analysis methods. More than 80% of the observed proteins demonstrate interactions with IgG and/or albumin, and the human plasma protein loss in the affinity chromatography/strong cation exchange/reversed‐phase liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry methodology was investigated in detail. The results of this study provide a basis for a wide range of plasma proteomics studies, including broad quantitation of relative abundances in comparative studies of the identification of novel protein disease markers, as well as further studies of protein‐protein interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Cited by
Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies
Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I., & Schwenk, J. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0268-2 · Cited by 478
Isotope-labeled Protein Standards
Brun, V., Dupuis, A., Adrait, A., Marcellin, M., Thomas, D., Court, M., Vandenesch, F., & Garin, J. (2007) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m700163-mcp200 · Cited by 445
Adipokines: A treasure trove for the discovery of biomarkers for metabolic disorders
Lehr, S., Hartwig, S., & Sell, H. (2012) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201100052 · Cited by 352
Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research
Bodzon-Kulakowska, A., Bierczynska-Krzysik, A., Dylag, T., Drabik, A., Suder, P., Noga, M., Jarzebinska, J., & Silberring, J. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.040 · Cited by 254
Corbett, B. A., Kantor, A. B., Schulman, H., Walker, W. L., Lit, L., Ashwood, P., Rocke, D. M., & Sharp, F. R. (2007) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001943 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Kim, J., Strittmatter, E. F., Jacobs, J. M., Camp, D. G., Fang, R., Tolié, N., Moore, R. J., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4034-4045
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2132016863
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.