Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advantages and limitations of clear‐native PAGE

Open access
Wittig, Ilka, Schägger, Hermann·2005·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Clear‐native PAGE (CN‐PAGE) separates acidic water‐soluble and membrane proteins (p I < 7) in an acrylamide gradient gel, and usually has lower resolution than blue‐native PAGE (BN‐PAGE). The migration distance depends on the protein intrinsic charge, and on the pore size of the gradient gel. This complicates estimation of native masses and oligomerization states when compared to BN‐PAGE, which uses negatively charged protein‐bound Coomassie‐dye to impose a charge shift on the proteins. Therefore, BN‐PAGE rather than CN‐PAGE is commonly used for standard analyses. However, CN‐PAGE offers advantages whenever Coomassie‐dye interferes with techniques required to further analyze the native complexes, e.g., determination of catalytic activities, as shown here for mitochondrial ATP synthase, or efficient microscale separation of membrane protein complexes for fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analyses. CN‐PAGE is milder than BN‐PAGE. Especially the combination of digitonin and CN‐PAGE can retain labile supramolecular assemblies of membrane protein complexes that are dissociated under the conditions of BN‐PAGE. Enzymatically active oligomeric states of mitochondrial ATP synthase previously not detected using BN‐PAGE were identified by CN‐PAGE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200500081

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Wittig, I., & Schägger, H.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
5
Issue
17
Pages
4338-4346
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2145118242
Cited by
264
References
22
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advantages and limitations of clear‐native PAGE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200500081
The paper
Wittig, I., & Schägger, H. (2005). Advantages and limitations of clear‐native PAGE. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.