The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics
Open accessAbstract
In the last ten years, the field of proteomics has expanded at a rapid rate. A range of exciting new technology has been developed and enthusiastically applied to an enormous variety of biological questions. However, the degree of stringency required in proteomic data generation and analysis appears to have been underestimated. As a result, there are likely to be numerous published findings that are of questionable quality, requiring further confirmation and/or validation. This manuscript outlines a number of key issues in proteomic research, including those associated with experimental design, differential display and biomarker discovery, protein identification and analytical incompleteness. In an effort to set a standard that reflects current thinking on the necessary and desirable characteristics of publishable manuscripts in the field, a minimal set of guidelines for proteomics research is then described. These guidelines will serve as a set of criteria which editors of PROTEOMICS will use for assessment of future submissions to the Journal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., & Cottrell, J. S. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::aid-elps3551>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 8,203
A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., & Aebersold, R. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0341261 · Cited by 4,809
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415141a · Cited by 4,759
Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D., & Yates, J. R. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/85686 · Cited by 4,752
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B., Parker, K., Hattan, S., Khainovski, N., Pillai, S., Dey, S., Daniels, S., et al. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400129-mcp200 · Cited by 4,401
Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry
Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G. D., Moore, L., Adams, S.-L., Millar, A., Taylor, P., Bennett, K., Boutilier, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415180a · Cited by 3,601
A Model for Random Sampling and Estimation of Relative Protein Abundance in Shotgun Proteomics
Liu, H., Sadygov, R. G., & Yates, J. R. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0498563 · Cited by 2,500
Difference gel electrophoresis. A single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts
Ünlü, M., Morgan, M. E., & Minden, J. S. (1997) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.1150181133 · Cited by 2,179
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE)
Taylor, C. F., Paton, N. W., Lilley, K. S., Binz, P.-A., Julian, R. K., Jones, A. R., Zhu, W., Apweiler, R., Aebersold, R., Deutsch, E. W., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1329 · Cited by 766
Self-citationGeromanos, S. J., Vissers, J. P. C., Silva, J. C., Dorschel, C. A., Li, G., Gorenstein, M. V., Bateman, R. H., & Langridge, J. I. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800562 · Cited by 497
Broadening the horizon – level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions
Kerrien, S., Orchard, S., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Aranda, B., Quinn, A. F., Vinod, N., Bader, G. D., Xenarios, I., Wojcik, J., Sherman, D., et al. (2007) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-44 · Cited by 266
Extracellular Proteins in Pea Root Tip and Border Cell Exudates
Wen, F., VanEtten, H. D., Tsaprailis, G., & Hawes, M. C. (2007) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.091637 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., Van Eyk, J. E., Chung, M. C. M., Görg, A., Hecker, M., Huber, L. A., Langen, H., Link, A. J., Paik, Y., Patterson, S. D., Pennington, S. R., Rabilloud, T., Simpson, R. J., Weiss, W., & Dunn, M. J.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-8
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1998783212
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 20.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200500856
- The paper
- Wilkins, M. R., Appel, R. D., Van Eyk, J. E., Chung, M. C. M., Görg, A., Hecker, M., Huber, L. A., Langen, H., Link, A. J., Paik, Y., Patterson, S. D., Pennington, S. R., Rabilloud, T., Simpson, R. J., Weiss, W., & Dunn, M. J. (2006). Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
