Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,759

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

Open access
Gavin, Anne-Claude, Bösche, Markus, Krause, Roland, Grandi, Paola, Marzioch, Martina, Bauer, Andreas, Schultz, Jörg, Rick, Jens M., Michon, Anne-Marie, Cruciat, Cristina-Maria, Remor, Marita, Höfert, Christian, Schelder, Malgorzata, Brajenovic, Miro, Ruffner, Heinz, Merino, Alejandro, Klein, Karin, Hudak, Manuela, Dickson, David, Rudi, Tatjana, Gnau, Volker, Bauch, Angela, Bastuck, Sonja, Huhse, Bettina, Leutwein, Christina, Heurtier, Marie-Anne, Copley, Richard R., Edelmann, Angela, Querfurth, Erich, Rybin, Vladimir, Drewes, Gerard, Raida, Manfred, Bouwmeester, Tewis, Bork, Peer, Seraphin, Bertrand, Kuster, Bernhard, Neubauer, Gitte, Superti-Furga, Giulio·2002·Nature

Abstract

Most cellular processes are carried out by multiprotein complexes. The identification and analysis of their components provides insight into how the ensemble of expressed proteins (proteome) is organized into functional units. We used tandem-affinity purification (TAP) and mass spectrometry in a large-scale approach to characterize multiprotein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We processed 1,739 genes, including 1,143 human orthologues of relevance to human biology, and purified 589 protein assemblies. Bioinformatic analysis of these assemblies defined 232 distinct multiprotein complexes and proposed new cellular roles for 344 proteins, including 231 proteins with no previous functional annotation. Comparison of yeast and human complexes showed that conservation across species extends from single proteins to their molecular environment. Our analysis provides an outline of the eukaryotic proteome as a network of protein complexes at a level of organization beyond binary interactions. This higher-order map contains fundamental biological information and offers the context for a more reasoned and informed approach to drug discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/415141a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 4,759

Metadata

Authors
Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., Remor, M., Höfert, C., Schelder, M., Brajenovic, M., Ruffner, H., Merino, A., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Dickson, D., Rudi, T., Gnau, V., Bauch, A., Bastuck, S., Huhse, B., Leutwein, C., Heurtier, M.-A., Copley, R. R., Edelmann, A., Querfurth, E., Rybin, V., Drewes, G., Raida, M., Bouwmeester, T., Bork, P., Seraphin, B., Kuster, B., Neubauer, G., & Superti-Furga, G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-01
Volume
415
Issue
6868
Pages
141-147
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2084619201
Cited by
4,759
References
4
FWCI
157.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/415141a
The paper
Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., Remor, M., Höfert, C., Schelder, M., Brajenovic, M., Ruffner, H., Merino, A., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Dickson, D., . . . Superti-Furga, G. (2002). Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/415141a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.