The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research
Open accessAbstract
A novel, MS‐based approach for the relative quantification of proteins, relying on the derivatization of primary amino groups in intact proteins using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) is presented. Due to the isobaric mass design of the iTRAQ reagents, differentially labeled proteins do not differ in mass; accordingly, their corresponding proteolytic peptides appear as single peaks in MS scans. Because quantitative information is provided by isotope‐encoded reporter ions that can only be observed in MS/MS spectra, we analyzed the fragmentation behavior of ESI and MALDI ions of peptides generated from iTRAQ‐labeled proteins using a TOF/TOF and/or a QTOF instrument. We observed efficient liberation of reporter ions for singly protonated peptides at low‐energy collision conditions. In contrast, increased collision energies were required to liberate the iTRAQ label from lysine side chains of doubly charged peptides and, thus, to observe reporter ions suitable for relative quantification of proteins with high accuracy. We then developed a quantitative strategy that comprises labeling of intact proteins by iTRAQ followed by gel electrophoresis and peptide MS/MS analyses. As proof of principle, mixtures of five different proteins in various concentration ratios were quantified, demonstrating the general applicability of the approach presented here to quantitative MS‐based proteomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B., Parker, K., Hattan, S., Khainovski, N., Pillai, S., Dey, S., Daniels, S., et al. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400129-mcp200 · Cited by 4,401
Metabolic Labeling of Proteins for Proteomics
Beynon, R. J., & Pratt, J. M. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400010-mcp200 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer
Boj, S. F., Hwang, C.-I., Baker, L. A., Chio, I. I. C., Engle, D. D., Corbo, V., Jager, M., Ponz-Sarvise, M., Tiriac, H., Spector, M. S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.021 · Cited by 2,150
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Meier, F., Beck, S., Grassl, N., Lubeck, M., Park, M. A., Raether, O., & Mann, M. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932 · Cited by 423
Osorio, S., Alba, R., Damasceno, C. M. B., Lopez-Casado, G., Lohse, M., Zanor, M. I., Tohge, T., Usadel, B., Rose, J. K. C., Fei, Z., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175463 · Cited by 334
Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis
Chen, C., Hou, J., Tanner, J. J., & Cheng, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21082873 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiese, S., Reidegeld, K. A., Meyer, H. E., & Warscheid, B.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340-350
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2025422229
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200600422
- The paper
- Wiese, S., Reidegeld, K. A., Meyer, H. E., & Warscheid, B. (2007). Protein labeling by iTRAQ: A new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.