Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays

Open access
Doolan, Denise L., Mu, Yunxiang, Unal, Berkay, Sundaresh, Suman, Hirst, Siddiqua, Valdez, Conrad, Randall, Arlo, Molina, Douglas, Liang, Xiaowu, Freilich, Daniel A., Oloo, J. Aggrey, Blair, Peter L., Aguiar, Joao C., Baldi, Pierre, Davies, D. Huw, Felgner, Philip L.·2008·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

A complete description of the serological response following exposure of humans to complex pathogens is lacking and approaches suitable for accomplishing this are limited. Here we report, using malaria as a model, a method which elucidates the profile of antibodies that develop after natural or experimental infection or after vaccination with attenuated organisms, and which identifies immunoreactive antigens of interest for vaccine development or other applications. Expression vectors encoding 250 Plasmodium falciparum ( Pf ) proteins were generated by PCR/recombination cloning; the proteins were individually expressed with >90% efficiency in Escherichia coli cell‐free in vitro transcription and translation reactions, and printed directly without purification onto microarray slides. The protein microarrays were probed with human sera from one of four groups which differed in immune status: sterile immunity or no immunity against experimental challenge following vaccination with radiation‐attenuated Pf sporozoites, partial immunity acquired by natural exposure, and no previous exposure to Pf . Overall, 72 highly reactive Pf antigens were identified. Proteomic features associated with immunoreactivity were identified. Importantly, antibody profiles were distinct for each donor group. Information obtained from such analyses will facilitate identifying antigens for vaccine development, dissecting the molecular basis of immunity, monitoring the outcome of whole‐organism vaccine trials, and identifying immune correlates of protection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200800194

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Doolan, D. L., Mu, Y., Unal, B., Sundaresh, S., Hirst, S., Valdez, C., Randall, A., Molina, D., Liang, X., Freilich, D. A., Oloo, J. A., Blair, P. L., Aguiar, J. C., Baldi, P., Davies, D. H., & Felgner, P. L.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11
Volume
8
Issue
22
Pages
4680-4694
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W1972073650
Cited by
257
References
2
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200800194
The paper
Doolan, D. L., Mu, Y., Unal, B., Sundaresh, S., Hirst, S., Valdez, C., Randall, A., Molina, D., Liang, X., Freilich, D. A., Oloo, J. A., Blair, P. L., Aguiar, J. C., Baldi, P., Davies, D. H., & Felgner, P. L. (2008). Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.