The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for the analysis of posttranslational modifications
Abstract
Despite major advantages in the field of proteomics, the analysis of PTMs still poses a major challenge; thus far, preventing insights into the role and regulation of protein networks. Additionally, top‐down sequencing of proteins is another powerful approach to reveal comprehensive information for biological function. A commonly used fragmentation technique in MS‐based peptide sequencing is CID. As CID often fails in PTM‐analysis and performs best on doubly‐charged, short and middle‐sized peptides, confident peptide identification may be hampered. A newly developed fragmentation technique, namely electron transfer dissociation (ETD), supports both, PTM‐ and top‐down analysis, and generally results in more confident identification of long, highly charged or modified peptides. The following review presents the theoretical background of ETD and its technical implementation in mass analyzers. Furthermore, current improvements of ETD and approaches for the PTM‐analysis and top‐down sequencing are introduced. Alternating both fragmentation techniques, ETD and CID, increases the amount of information derived from peptide fragmentation, thereby enhancing both, peptide sequence coverage and the confidence of peptide and protein identification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry
Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402700101 · Cited by 2,370
Sulfonation and molecular action
Strott, C. A. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2001-0040 · Cited by 487
Protein identification using sequential ion/ion reactions and tandem mass spectrometry
Coon, J. J., Ueberheide, B., Syka, J. E. P., Dryhurst, D. D., Ausio, J., Shabanowitz, J., & Hunt, D. F. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503189102 · Cited by 373
Ion/Ion Proton Transfer Reactions for Protein Mixture Analysis
Stephenson, J. L., & McLuckey, S. A. (1996) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac9605657 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., & Heck, A. J. R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1599 · Cited by 362
Mucin‐type O‐glycosylation – putting the pieces together
Jensen, P. H., Kolarich, D., & Packer, N. H. (2010) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07429.x · Cited by 252
Advances in mass spectrometry driven O-glycoproteomics
Levery, S. B., Steentoft, C., Halim, A., Narimatsu, Y., Clausen, H., & Vakhrushev, S. Y. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.026 · Cited by 111
Catch me if you can: Mass spectrometry‐based phosphoproteomics and quantification strategies
Eyrich, B., Sickmann, A., & Zahedi, R. P. (2011) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201000489 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiesner, J., Premsler, T., & Sickmann, A.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4466-4483
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2168071329
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for the analysis of posttranslational modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200800329
- The paper
- Wiesner, J., Premsler, T., & Sickmann, A. (2008). Application of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for the analysis of posttranslational modifications. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.