Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 669

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gram‐positive bacteria produce membrane vesicles: Proteomics‐based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus ‐derived membrane vesicles

Lee, Eun‐Young, Choi, Do‐Young, Kim, Dae‐Kyum, Kim, Jung‐Wook, Park, Jung Ok, Kim, Sungjee, Kim, Sang‐Hyun, Desiderio, Dominic M., Kim, Yoon‐Keun, Kim, Kwang‐Pyo, Gho, Yong Song·2009·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Although archaea, Gram‐negative bacteria, and mammalian cells constitutively secrete membrane vesicles (MVs) as a mechanism for cell‐free intercellular communication, this cellular process has been overlooked in Gram‐positive bacteria. Here, we found for the first time that Gram‐positive bacteria naturally produce MVs into the extracellular milieu. Further characterizations showed that the density and size of Staphylococcus aureus ‐derived MVs are both similar to those of Gram‐negative bacteria. With a proteomics approach, we identified with high confidence a total of 90 protein components of S. aureus ‐derived MVs. In the group of identified proteins, the highly enriched extracellular proteins suggested that a specific sorting mechanism for vesicular proteins exists. We also identified proteins that facilitate the transfer of proteins to other bacteria, as well to eliminate competing organisms, antibiotic resistance, pathological functions in systemic infections, and MV biogenesis. Taken together, these observations suggest that the secretion of MVs is an evolutionally conserved, universal process that occurs from simple organisms to complex multicellular organisms. This information will help us not only to elucidate the biogenesis and functions of MVs, but also to develop therapeutic tools for vaccines, diagnosis, and antibiotics effective against pathogenic strains of Gram‐positive bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.200900338

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 669

Metadata

Authors
Lee, E., Choi, D., Kim, D., Kim, J., Park, J. O., Kim, S., Kim, S., Desiderio, D. M., Kim, Y., Kim, K., & Gho, Y. S.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
9
Issue
24
Pages
5425-5436
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2073273682
Cited by
669
References
3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gram‐positive bacteria produce membrane vesicles: Proteomics‐based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus ‐derived membrane vesicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.200900338
The paper
Lee, E., Choi, D., Kim, D., Kim, J., Park, J. O., Kim, S., Kim, S., Desiderio, D. M., Kim, Y., Kim, K., & Gho, Y. S. (2009). Gram‐positive bacteria produce membrane vesicles: Proteomics‐based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus ‐derived membrane vesicles. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900338

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.