Cited by 156Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Protein abundances are more conserved than mRNA abundances across diverse taxa

Open access
Laurent, Jon M., Vogel, Christine, Kwon, Taejoon, Craig, Stephanie A., Boutz, Daniel R., Huse, Holly K., Nozue, Kazunari, Walia, Harkamal +3 more·2010·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Proteins play major roles in most biological processes; as a consequence, protein expression levels are highly regulated. While extensive post‐transcriptional, translational and protein degradation control clearly influence protein concentration and functionality, it is often thought that protein abundances are primarily determined by the abundances of the corresponding mRNAs. Hence surprisingly, a recent study showed that abundances of orthologous nematode and fly proteins correlate better than their corresponding mRNA abundances. We tested if this phenomenon is general by collecting and testing matching large‐scale protein and mRNA expression data sets from seven different species: two bacteria, yeast, nematode, fly, human, and rice. We find that steady‐state abundances of proteins show significantly higher correlation across these diverse phylogenetic taxa than the abundances of their corresponding mRNAs ( p =0.0008, paired Wilcoxon). These data support the presence of strong selective pressure to maintain protein abundances during evolution, even when mRNA abundances diverge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201000327

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein expression evolves under greater evolutionary constraint than transcript levels.

    “Comparative studies (9-13) have suggested that protein expression evolves under greater evolutionary constraint than transcript levels (14)”

    From Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

  • There is evidence consistent with buffering of protein expression with respect to variation introduced at the transcript level.

    “and provided evidence consistent with buffering of protein expression with respect to variation introduced at the transcript level.”

    From Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laurent, J. M., Vogel, C., Kwon, T., Craig, S. A., Boutz, D. R., Huse, H. K., Nozue, K., Walia, H., Whiteley, M., Ronald, P. C., & Marcotte, E. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Marcotte, Edward M.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-18
Volume
10
Issue
23
Pages
4209-4212
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2108078395
Cited by
156
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM055962, GM 55962, R01GM088624)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI075068)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein abundance, mRNA levels, orthologous proteins, cross-species conservation, post-transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, protein degradation, selection pressure, gene expression evolution, nematodes, flies, yeast, bacteria, rice, human
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Humans, Plant Proteins, Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Species Specificity, Gene Expression, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review