Cited by 4Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchGene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Single‐cell pluripotency regulatory networks

Open access
Stumpf, Patrick S., Ewing, Rob, MacArthur, Ben D.·2016·PROTEOMICS

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are a popular model system for investigating development, tissue regeneration, and repair. Although much is known about the molecular mechanisms that regulate the balance between self‐renewal and lineage commitment in PSCs, the spatiotemporal integration of responsive signaling pathways with core transcriptional regulatory networks are complex and only partially understood. Moreover, measurements made on populations of cells reveal only average properties of the underlying regulatory networks, obscuring their fine detail. Here, we discuss the reconstruction of regulatory networks in individual cells using novel single‐cell transcriptomics and proteomics, in order to expand our understanding of the molecular basis of pluripotency, including the role of cell–cell variability within PSC populations, and ways in which networks may be controlled in order to reliably manipulate cell behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201500528

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Stumpf, P. S., Ewing, R., & MacArthur, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Ewing, Rob
  • MacArthur, Ben D.
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-12
Volume
16
Issue
17
Pages
2303-2312
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W2460035027
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (Oncoprotnet / FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L000512)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
pluripotency, pluripotent stem cells, transcriptional regulatory networks, single-cell transcriptomics, single-cell proteomics, self-renewal, lineage commitment, signaling pathways, network inference
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Signal Transduction, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Proteomics, Gene Regulatory Networks, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Transcriptome, Protein Interaction Maps, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review