The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parallel reaction monitoring using quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer: Principle and applications
Abstract
Targeted mass spectrometry‐based approaches are nowadays widely used for quantitative proteomics studies and more recently have been implemented on high resolution/accurate mass (HRAM) instruments resulting in a considerable performance improvement. More specifically, the parallel reaction monitoring technique (PRM) performed on quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometers, leveraging the high resolution and trapping capabilities of the instrument, offers a clear advantage over the conventional selected reaction monitoring (SRM) measurements executed on triple quadrupole instruments. Analyses performed in HRAM mode allow for an improved discrimination between signals derived from analytes and those resulting from matrix interferences translating in the reliable quantification of low abundance components. The purpose of the study defines various implementation schemes of PRM, namely: (i) exploratory experiments assessing the detectability of very large sets of peptides (100–1000), (ii) wide‐screen analyses using (crude) internal standards to obtain statistically meaningful (relative) quantitative analyses, and (iii) precise/accurate quantification of a limited number of analytes using calibrated internal standards. Each of the three implementation schemes requires specific acquisition methods with defined parameters to appropriately control the acquisition during the actual peptide elution. This tutorial describes the different PRM approaches and discusses their benefits and limitations in terms of quantification performance and confidence in analyte identification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology
Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D., & Yates, J. R. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/85686 · Cited by 4,752
Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments
MacLean, B., Tomazela, D. M., Shulman, N., Chambers, M., Finney, G. L., Frewen, B., Kern, R., Tabb, D. L., Liebler, D. C., & MacCoss, M. J. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 · Cited by 4,697
Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Röst, H., Selevsek, N., Reiter, L., Bonner, R., & Aebersold, R. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.016717 · Cited by 2,877
ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination
Vizcaíno, J. A., Deutsch, E. W., Wang, R., Csordas, A., Reisinger, F., Ríos, D., Dianes, J. A., Sun, Z., Farrah, T., Bandeira, N., et al. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2839 · Cited by 2,729
The Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013
Vizcaíno, J. A., Côté, R. G., Csordas, A., Dianes, J. A., Fabregat, A., Foster, J. M., Griss, J., Alpi, E., Birim, M., Contell, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1262 · Cited by 1,918
Peng, J., Elias, J. E., Thoreen, C. C., Licklider, L. J., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr025556v · Cited by 1,647
Peterson, A. C., Russell, J. D., Bailey, D. J., Westphall, M. S., & Coon, J. J. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o112.020131 · Cited by 1,288
Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification
Stein, S. E., & Scott, D. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8 · Cited by 882
Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra
Venable, J. D., Dong, M.-Q., Wohlschlegel, J., Dillin, A., & Yates, J. R. (2004) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth705 · Cited by 794
Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy
Domon, B., & Aebersold, R. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1661 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Cited by
Detection of selected tire wear compounds in urban receiving waters
Johannessen, C., Helm, P., & Metcalfe, C. D. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117659 · Cited by 259
Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics
Zhang, B., Whiteaker, J. R., Hoofnagle, A. N., Baird, G. S., Rodland, K. D., & Paulovich, A. G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0135-7 · Cited by 210
Complex‐centric proteome profiling by SEC‐SWATH‐MS
Heusel, M., Bludau, I., Rosenberger, G., Hafen, R., Frank, M., Banaei‐Esfahani, A., van Drogen, A., Collins, B. C., Gstaiger, M., & Aebersold, R. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188438 · Cited by 141
Cilento, E. M., Jin, L., Stewart, T., Shi, M., Sheng, L., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.14635 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourmaud, A., Gallien, S., & Domon, B.
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-27
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 15-16
- Pages
- 2146-2159
- ISSN
- 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2345735224
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel reaction monitoring using quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer: Principle and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pmic.201500543
- The paper
- Bourmaud, A., Gallien, S., & Domon, B. (2016). Parallel reaction monitoring using quadrupole‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer: Principle and applications. PROTEOMICS. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
