Cited by 7Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applicationsinterferon and immune responsesMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Virology meets Proteomics

Open access
Cristea, Ileana M., Graham, David·2015·PROTEOMICS

Abstract

Ileana M. Cristea David Graham Recent years have witnessed the significant contribution of proteomics to understanding important concepts in virology. Viruses have co-evolved with their hosts, acquiring mechanisms to capture and manipulate host cellular processes for their replication and spread. Similarly, host cells respond by deploying defense mechanisms or by adapting to the infection environment. Proteomics has delivered powerful tools for characterizing this dynamic interaction between viruses and hosts. This success was driven by improvements in proteomic workflows and mass spectrometry instrumentation, as well as by the increased awareness of these valuable proteomic methods within the virology community. Indeed, in recent years, mass spectrometry (MS) has progressed from being a sparsely used technology, hidden in the supplementary material of some virology studies, to being a major contributor to fundamental discoveries in virology. For example, MS-based analyses have been used to characterize the composition of virions, define virus-host protein interactions, map global proteome or secretome changes following infection, determine the function of posttranslational modifications during infection, and define novel mechanisms of host defense against viruses. Our Special Issue aims to celebrate and highlight the integration of these two fields of research, Proteomics and Virology, as well as to raise awareness in both communities of the opportunities present in Viral Proteomics research. The issue contains 15 manuscripts that reflect the impressive diversity of virology studies that benefit from the wide range of available proteomic-based approaches. The elegant merge of these two fields of research is illustrated by the fact that these manuscripts come from both virology and mass spectrometry laboratories. While, of course, not all of the leading laboratories were able to contribute to this issue, we are very pleased to say that, as detailed below, the investigators highlighted in this issue represent some of the major supporters of proteomics for virology studies. We have organized this issue using classical virology taxonomy by dividing the issue into two main sections communicating reports describing either DNA or RNA viruses and a third section on non-MS based proteomics. Section 1, DNA viruses, begins with an informative review discussing the biological discoveries made possible by MS-based proteomics when studying alpha herpesviruses, a major family of human pathogens. This review comes from one of the world-leading virology groups in this area - the Enquist laboratory. Extending the theme of alpha herpesviruses, the two next research papers uncovered protein interactions during infection with herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1). First, from the laboratory of David Knipe, one of the first to use MS in protein interaction studies during infection. This study identified an important viral-viral protein interaction for the HSV-1 tegument protein VP16, and proposed an expanded role for VP16 in transactivation of viral gene expression. Second is a paper by Rowles et al. which highlights the value of immunoaffinity purification (IP) and MS for defining virus-host interactions, identifying the association of HSV-1 proteins with an important cellular epigenetic factor. This study adds to the growing interest in the scientific community in understanding the impact of viral infection on the epigenetic landscape of a cell, and comes from a group that was the first to use IP-MS, a now central tool in the field, to study temporal virus-host protein interactions during the progression of an infection. The next three manuscripts focus on the beta herpesvirus, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). The Moorman lab elegantly demonstrates the importance of studying RNA-protein interactions, identifying a new mechanism through which a viral factor regulates translation during HCMV infection. The next two papers characterize changes in both the proteome and posttranslational modifications. The Terhune lab used metabolic labeling in conjunction with cellular fractionation to build a valuable repository of changes occurring in the nuclei of HCMV infected cells, discovering nuclear import factors that are required for effective HCMV replication. The final beta herpesvirus manuscript comes from the laboratory of Tom Shenk, a world-recognized expert in HCMV biology. Metabolic labeling and phosphopeptide enrichment approaches uncovered the impact of a viral kinase on the cellular phosphoproteome and a novel phosphorylation motif. Further emphasizing the broad contribution of proteomics to herpesvirus studies, the next paper focused on a human cancer virus, the gamma herpesvirus Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). The Robertson group investigated cellular proteins that bind to the SUMO-interaction motif of the viral latent nuclear antigen (LANA), expanding the current understanding of the role of SUMOylation in KSHV infect

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmic.201570103

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cristea, I. M., & Graham, D.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cristea, Ileana M.
  • Graham, David
Venue
PROTEOMICS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1941-1942
ISSN
  • 1615-9853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-9861
OpenAlex
W1502517155
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PROTEOMICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DP1DA026192)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R33AI102187, R21AI102187)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
viral proteomics, host-virus interaction, alphaherpesvirus, herpes simplex virus type 1, host defense against viruses, post-translational modification, DNA viruses, RNA viruses, host response to infection, host-virus coevolution
MeSH terms
Humans, Viral Proteins, Virology, Proteome, Proteomics, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review