Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,582

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What you Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview

Flyvbjerg, Bent·2014·Project Management Journal

Abstract

This paper takes stock of megaproject management, an emerging and hugely costly field of study, by first answering the question of how large megaprojects are by measuring them in the units of mega, giga, and tera, and concluding with how we are presently entering a new “tera era” of trillion-dollar projects. Second, total global megaproject spending is assessed, at US$6 to US$9 trillion annually, or 8% of the total global gross domestic product (GDP), which denotes the biggest investment boom in human history. Third, four “sublimes”—political, technological, economic, and aesthetic—are identified and used to explain the increased size and frequency of megaprojects. Fourth, the “iron law of megaprojects” is laid out and documented: Over budget, over time, over and over again. Moreover, the “break–fix model” of megaproject management is introduced as an explanation of the iron law. Fifth, Albert O. Hirschman's theory of the “Hiding Hand” is revisited and critiqued as unfounded and corrupting for megaproject thinking in both the academy and policy. Sixth, it is shown how megaprojects are systematically subject to “survival of the unfittest,” which explains why the worst projects get built rather than the best. Finally, it is argued that the conventional way of managing megaprojects has reached a “tension point,” in which tradition is being challenged and reform is emerging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmj.21409

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adelman J., 2013, Worldly philosopher: The odyssey of Albert O. Hirschman.
  3. 10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.009 · DOI
  4. Brown W., 2013, San Francisco Chronicle, 27
  5. 10.1177/002085239806400306 · DOI
  6. BudzierA. & FlyvbjergB. (2013). Making sense of the impact and importance of outliers in project management through the use of power laws. Proceedings of the 11th International Research Network on Organizing by Projects (IRNOP) Conference , June 16–19, Oslo, 28 pp.
  7. 10.1068/b36017 · DOI
  8. Danish Ministry for Transport and Energy, 2006, Aktstykke om nye budgetteringsprincipper
  9. Drummond H., 1998, Organisation Studies, 919
  10. Dutch Commission on Infrastructure Projects, Tijdelijke Commissie Infrastructuurprojecten., 2004, Grote projecten uitvergroot: Een infrastructuur voor besluitvorming
  11. The Economist., 1989, Under water over budget, 37
  12. The Economist., 2008, Building BRICs of growth, 80
  13. 10.2307/258191 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Flyvbjerg B., 2005, Harvard Design Magazine, 22, 50
  15. 10.1177/875697280603700302 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/oxrep/grp024 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0014 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/CBO9780511719912.008 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.007 · DOI
  20. Flyvbjerg B., 2014, Megaproject planning and management: Essential readings., 10.4337/9781784713089 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/CBO9781107050891 · DOI
  22. Flyvbjerg B., 2011, Harvard Business Review, 89, 24
  23. 10.2307/41166485 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/01944360208976273 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/0144164032000080494a · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/01944360508976688 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1017/CBO9780511719912 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.4337/9781848440173.00020 · DOI
  29. Froomkin D., 2009, The Washington Post
  30. Gladwell M., 2013, The New Yorker
  31. Helm D., 2008, Monthly Commentary
  32. Hirschman A. O., 1967, Development projects observed.
  33. Hirschman A. O., 1967, The Public Interest, 10
  34. Hirschman A. O., 1995, Development projects observed, second edition with a new preface
  35. HM Treasury., 2003, The Green Book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government.
  36. 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01864.x · DOI
  37. Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, fast and slow.
  38. Kahneman D., 1979, Studies in the management sciences: Forecasting, 12, 313
  39. Marx L., 1967, The machine in the garden: Technology and the pastoral ideal in America.
  40. McKinsey Global Institute., 2013, Infrastructure productivity: How to save $1 trillion a year.
  41. Merrow E. W., 2011, Industrial mega-projects: Concepts, strategies, and practices for success.
  42. Miller P., 1965, The life of the mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War.
  43. 10.1680/mop.16934 · DOI
  44. Morris P. W. G., 1987, The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management.
  45. Murray P., 2004, The saga of Sydney Opera House: The dramatic story of the design and construction of the icon of modern Australia.
  46. Parliament of Victoria, 2012, Inquiry into effective decision making for the successful delivery of significant infrastructure projects. Public Accounts and Estimates Committee, Melbourne.
  47. 10.1080/01944369208975791 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Reichold K., 2004, Buildings that changed the world.
  49. Ross J., 1993, The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 701
  50. Sawyer J. E., 1952, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 4, 199
  51. 10.1080/21573727.2011.634546 · DOI
  52. The Standish Group., 2009, CHAOS report.
  53. 10.1007/978-1-349-20215-7_25 · DOI
  54. Swiss Association of Road and Transportation Experts., 2006, Kosten-Nutzen-analysen im strassenverkehr
  55. Taleb N. N., 2010, The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable
  56. Teitz M., 2003, Planning Theory and Practice., 429
  57. UK Department for Transport., 2006, The estimation and treatment of scheme costs: Transport analysis guidance
  58. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO)., 2013, Defense acquisitions: Assessments of selected weapon programs.
  59. 10.5840/bpej199091/215 · DOI
  60. White R., 2012, The New York Times
  61. 10.1002/pmj.20160 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Wittgenstein L., 2009, Philosophical investigations.

Cited by

See all 1,582

Metadata

Authors
Flyvbjerg, B.
Affiliations
Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
Venue
Project Management Journal
Published
2014-04
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
6-19
ISSN
  • 8756-9728
  • 1938-9507
Cited by
1,582
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.