Cited by 30Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesBone health and osteoporosis researchEating Disorders and Behaviors

Low energy availability surrogates associated with lower bone mineral density and bone stress injury site

Holtzman, Bryan, Popp, Kristin L., Tenforde, Adam S., Parziale, Allyson L., Taylor, Kathryn, Ackerman, Kathryn E.·2022·PM&R

Abstract

Background: Exercise is an osteogenic stimulus that should increase bone mineral density (BMD) and protect against injury. However, some female athletes have lower BMD and increased bone stress injury (BSI) risk. Impaired bone health seen in athletes may be explained by low energy availability as described by concepts of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED‐S) and Female Athlete Triad (Triad). Objective: To elucidate the relationship between RED‐S/Triad risk factors and BSI to high‐risk (femoral neck, sacrum) and low‐risk (other) bones. Design: Cross‐sectional survey and retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care academic center. Patients: Female athletes aged 15–30 years participating in ≥4 h/week of exercise presenting to sports medicine/orthopedics clinic who had a self‐reported BSI and available dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of BMD. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measurements: Location of BSI. Results: In 127 athletes, high‐risk BSI was associated with surrogates of low energy availability ( p = .032) and having a DXA Z‐score < −1 ( p = .035) but not a current/past history of menstrual dysfunction ( p = .348). Accumulating RED‐S/Triad risk factors increase the odds of incurring a high‐risk BSI ( p = .048). Conclusions: Adolescent/young female athletes who sustain BSI at high‐risk sites (femoral neck, sacrum) may have underlying risk factors (eg, low energy availability, poor overall bone health) that should prompt further workup and referral to optimize health in these athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pmrj.12821

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holtzman, B., Popp, K. L., Tenforde, A. S., Parziale, A. L., Taylor, K., & Ackerman, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ackerman, Kathryn E.
Venue
PM&R
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
587-596
ISSN
  • 1934-1482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-1563
OpenAlex
W4224313850
Cited by
30
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PM&R (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
bone stress injuries, low energy availability, relative energy deficiency in sport, female athlete triad, bone mineral density, female athletes, femoral neck, sacrum, menstrual disorders, youth athletes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Female Athlete Triad Syndrome, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review