Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A priori calculation of molecular properties to chemical accuracy

Helgaker, Trygve, Ruden, Torgeir A., Jørgensen, Poul, Olsen, Jeppe, Klopper, Wim·2004·Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry

Abstract

Quantum chemical methods for the calculation of molecular properties to chemical accuracy are reviewed. We begin by reviewing wave‐function based electronic structure theory, with emphasis on coupled‐cluster theory and the description of electron correlation in terms of virtual excitations from occupied to virtual molecular orbitals. Next, we discuss the expansion of molecular orbitals in atomic orbitals and the design of one‐electron basis sets for correlated calculations at the coupled‐cluster level of theory. In particular, we discuss the convergence of the electronic energy in the principal expansion as realized in the correlation‐consistent basis sets. Following this theoretical introduction, we consider the accurate calculation of atomization energies, reaction enthalpies, dipole moments and spectroscopic constants such as bond distances and harmonic and anharmonic force constants. For each property, we identify what levels of theory in terms of basis set (the one‐electron description) and virtual excitation level (the N‐electron description) are needed for agreement with experiment to chemical accuracy, that is, about 1 kcal mol−1 (1 kcal = 4.184 kJ) for atomization energies and reaction enthalpies, about 0.1 pm for bond distances and about 1 cm−1 for vibrational frequencies. In each case, we consider in detail the direction and magnitude of the changes in the calculated properties with improvements in the one‐ and N‐electron descriptions of the electronic system, paying particular attention to the cancellation of errors arising from the simultaneous truncations of the coupled‐cluster expansion and the one‐electron basis set. We emphasize that agreement with experiment, even with chemical accuracy, for a few selected properties is by itself no guarantee of quality and should never be taken as indicative of an accurate description of the electronic system. To ensure such a description, the errors arising from the truncations of the one‐ and N‐electron expansions must be controlled by carrying out sequences of calculations, where the different levels of theory are systematically varied and where convergence is carefully monitored. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/poc.841

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Helgaker, T., Ruden, T. A., Jørgensen, P., Olsen, J., & Klopper, W.
Venue
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
913-933
ISSN
  • 0894-3230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1395
OpenAlex
W1980667009
Cited by
237
References
1
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.