The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Squid chitin as a potential alternative chitin source: Deacetylation behavior and characteristic properties
Abstract
β‐Chitin was isolated from squid pens, and the characteristic chemical and physical properties were elucidated in comparison with those of shrimp chitin, α‐chitin. Deacetylation behavior of the squid chitin was first studied to look into the reactivity of β‐chitin and also to establish an efficient procedure for preparing squid chitosan. The squid chitin proved to show much higher reactivity in alkaline deacetylation than shrimp chitin. Although it was deacetylated quite easily, the product assumed a dark brown color under the ordinary reaction conditions for shrimp chitosan. Squid chitosan was successfully prepared by repeated alkaline treatments under mild conditions, particularly with high concentration alkali at low temperatures, without appreciable discoloration. The structural characteristics of the squid chitin were discussed on the basis of the IR and x‐ray analysis data. The crystalline structure of squid chitin was destroyed easily on deacetylation compared to that of shrimp chitin, and moreover, the resulting squid chitosan was amorphous unlike crystalline shrimp chitosan. The squid chitin was characterized by the remarkable affinity for organic solvents and water. Squid chitin and chitosan also showed much higher hygroscopicity and retention of the absorbed water than shrimp chitin and chitosan and are considered to be useful as highly hydrophilic materials. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications
Anitha, A., Sowmya, S., Kumar, P. T. S., Deepthi, S., Chennazhi, K. P., Ehrlich, H., Tsurkan, M., & Jayakumar, R. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008 · Cited by 931
Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings: A review
Hamedi, H., Moradi, S., Hudson, S. M., & Tonelli, A. E. (2018) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.114 · Cited by 759
Preparation and Characterization of Chitin and Chitosan—A Review
No, H. K., & Meyers, S. P. (1995) · Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology · doi:10.1300/j030v04n02_03 · Cited by 462
Current state of chitin purification and chitosan production from insects
Hahn, T., Tafi, E., Paul, A., Salvia, R., Falabella, P., & Zibek, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.6533 · Cited by 373
Chitin, Chitosan, and Co-Products: Chemistry, Production, Applications, and Health Effects
Shahidi, F., & Abuzaytoun, R. (2005) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/s1043-4526(05)49003-8 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurita, K., Tomita, K., Tada, T., Ishii, S., Nishimura, S., & Shimoda, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 485-491
- ISSN
- 0887-624X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0518
- OpenAlex
- W2156051602
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Squid chitin as a potential alternative chitin source: Deacetylation behavior and characteristic properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pola.1993.080310220
- The paper
- Kurita, K., Tomita, K., Tada, T., Ishii, S., Nishimura, S., & Shimoda, K. (1993). Squid chitin as a potential alternative chitin source: Deacetylation behavior and characteristic properties. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1993.080310220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.