Cited by 122biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationPolymer composites and self-healing

Cationic copolymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L,L‐lactide by an activated monomer mechanism

Baśko, Małgorzata, Kubisa, Przemysław·2006·Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry

Abstract

Abstract The cationic homopolymerization and copolymerization of L,L‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone in the presence of alcohol have been studied. The rate of homopolymerization of ε‐caprolactone is slightly higher than that of L,L‐lactide. In the copolymerization, the reverse order of reactivities has been observed, and L,L‐lactide is preferentially incorporated into the copolymer. Both the homopolymerization and copolymerization proceed by an activated monomer mechanism, and the molecular weights and dispersities are controlled {number‐average degree of polymerization = ([M]0 − [M]t)/[I]0, where [M]0 is the initial monomer concentration, [M]t is the monomer concentration at time t, and [I]0 is the initial initiator concentration; weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight ∼1.1–1.3}. An analysis of 13C NMR spectra of the copolymers indicates that transesterification is slow in comparison with propagation, and the microstructure of the copolymers is governed by the relative reactivity of the comonomers. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 7071–7081, 2006

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pola.21712

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reactivity of LA and CL monomers is very different in the ring-opening copolymerization process of PLCL.

    “The reactivity of the two monomers is very different in the ring opening copolymerization (ROP) process of poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) [17,18,19,20].”
  • Because the monomer is more basic than the polymer, the activated monomer mechanism favors polymerization over transesterification.

    “Because the monomer is more basic than the polymer, this mechanism favors polymerization over transesteri fi cation.”

    From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [46]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 122

Authors
Baśko, M., & Kubisa, P.
Affiliations
Centrum Badań Molekularnych i Makromolekularnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk (PL)
Corresponding author
Kubisa, Przemysław
Venue
Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-14
Volume
44
Issue
24
Pages
7071-7081
ISSN
  • 0887-624X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0518
OpenAlex
W2079978284
Cited by
122
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
cationic copolymerization, ε-caprolactone, activated monomer mechanism, homopolymerization, copolymer microstructure, comonomer reactivity ratios, transesterification, molecular weight control, degree of polymerization, polycaprolactone, polylactic acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review