Cationic copolymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L,L‐lactide by an activated monomer mechanism
Abstract
Abstract The cationic homopolymerization and copolymerization of L,L‐lactide and ε‐caprolactone in the presence of alcohol have been studied. The rate of homopolymerization of ε‐caprolactone is slightly higher than that of L,L‐lactide. In the copolymerization, the reverse order of reactivities has been observed, and L,L‐lactide is preferentially incorporated into the copolymer. Both the homopolymerization and copolymerization proceed by an activated monomer mechanism, and the molecular weights and dispersities are controlled {number‐average degree of polymerization = ([M]0 − [M]t)/[I]0, where [M]0 is the initial monomer concentration, [M]t is the monomer concentration at time t, and [I]0 is the initial initiator concentration; weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight ∼1.1–1.3}. An analysis of 13C NMR spectra of the copolymers indicates that transesterification is slow in comparison with propagation, and the microstructure of the copolymers is governed by the relative reactivity of the comonomers. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 7071–7081, 2006
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reactivity of LA and CL monomers is very different in the ring-opening copolymerization process of PLCL.
“The reactivity of the two monomers is very different in the ring opening copolymerization (ROP) process of poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) [17,18,19,20].”
From Synthesis of Poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) Copolymer: Structure, Toughness, and Elasticity (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
Because the monomer is more basic than the polymer, the activated monomer mechanism favors polymerization over transesterification.
“Because the monomer is more basic than the polymer, this mechanism favors polymerization over transesteri fi cation.”
From Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymer Design (2016) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Baśko, M., & Kubisa, P.
- Affiliations
- Centrum Badań Molekularnych i Makromolekularnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kubisa, Przemysław
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-14
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7071-7081
- ISSN
- 0887-624X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0518
- OpenAlex
- W2079978284
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Keywords
- cationic copolymerization, ε-caprolactone, activated monomer mechanism, homopolymerization, copolymer microstructure, comonomer reactivity ratios, transesterification, molecular weight control, degree of polymerization, polycaprolactone, polylactic acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review