The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer brushes on flat and curved surfaces: How computer simulations can help to test theories and to interpret experiments
Open accessAbstract
Theoretical descriptions of static properties of polymer brushes are reviewed, with an emphasis on monodisperse macromolecules grafted to planar, cylindrical, or spherical substrates. Blob concepts and resulting scaling relations are outlined, and various versions of the self‐consistent field theory are summarized: the classical approximation and the strong stretching limit, as well as the lattice formulation. The physical justification of various inherent assumptions is discussed, and computer simulation results addressing the test of the validity of these approximations are reviewed. Also, alternative theories, such as the single chain mean field theory and the density functional theory, are briefly mentioned, and the main facts about the models used in the computer simulations are summarized. Both molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations are described, the latter including lattice models and bead‐spring models in the continuum. Also extensions such as brush–brush interactions or nanoparticles inside of brushes as well as the solubility of free chains in brushes are briefly mentioned. Pertinent experimental results, though still somewhat scarce, are mentioned throughout and their consequences on the status of the theoretical understanding of polymer brushes is emphasized. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2012
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: A molecular-dynamics simulation
Kremer, K., & Grest, G. S. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458541 · Cited by 4,023
Carmesin, I., & Kremer, K. (1988) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00187a030 · Cited by 1,267
Interdiffusion and self-diffusion in polymer mixtures: A Monte Carlo study
Deutsch, H. P., & Binder, K. (1991) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.459901 · Cited by 585
Self-citationStress relaxation in the lamellar copolymer mesophase
Witten, T. A., Leibler, L., & Pincus, P. A. (1990) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00205a022 · Cited by 202
Wijmans, C. M., Zhulina, E. B., & Fleer, G. J. (1994) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00090a017 · Cited by 135
Repulsive Forces and Relaxation on Compression of Entangled, Polydisperse Polystyrene Brushes
Ruths, M., Johannsmann, D., Rühe, J., & Knoll, W. (2000) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma9920994 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Hui, C. M., Pietrasik, J., Schmitt, M., Mahoney, C., Choi, J., Bockstaller, M. R., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm4023634 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Binder, K., & Milchev, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-26
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1515-1555
- ISSN
- 0887-6266 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0488
- OpenAlex
- W1982066025
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer brushes on flat and curved surfaces: How computer simulations can help to test theories and to interpret experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/polb.23168
- The paper
- Binder, K., & Milchev, A. (2012). Polymer brushes on flat and curved surfaces: How computer simulations can help to test theories and to interpret experiments. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.23168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.