The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding White Polarization in the 2016 Vote for President: The Sobering Role of Racism and Sexism
Abstract
THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN FEATURED major-party candidates who both explicitly put issues of race and gender at the forefront of the discourse. Notably, 2016 also witnessed the largest gap between the presidential vote preferences of college-educated and non-college-educated whites since 1980. While Donald Trump enjoyed just a four-point margin over Hillary Clinton among whites with a college degree (10 points less than Mitt Romney’s margin over Barack Obama among that group in 2012), his advantage among non-college-educated whites was nearly 40 points.1 This gap between college-educated and non-college-educated whites was possibly the single most important divide documented in 2016, and it was the culmination of an increasing divide in party identification among college-educated and non-college-educated whites following Obama’s election in 2008.2 While many election postmortems were quick to make note of the education gap among whites in terms of presidential vote choice in 2016, explanations for the origins of this gap were a subject of significant debate. Two primary explanations have been offered. The first is that white working-class Americans were left behind during the economic recovery that took place during the Obama presidency, and Trump’s populist economic message, focusing on protectionism and other policies to help working people, resonated with this feeling.3 A second explanation is that Trump’s willingness to make explicitly racist and sexist appeals during the campaign, coupled with the presence of an African American president and the first major-party female nominee, made racism and sexism a dividing line in the vote in this election.4 This led less educated whites, who tend to exhibit higher levels of sexism and racism, to support Trump, while more educated whites were more supportive of Clinton.5
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is growing evidence that racial prejudice and resentment is one of the critical determinants of the appeal of Donald Trump to a substantial proportion of American adults [128,129,130].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“These associations were evident after holding constant multiple factors that predict voting behavior.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“Also, denial of racism more strongly predicted voting behavior in 2016 than in 2012 and it predicted some voters who voted for Obama in 2012 becoming Trump supporters in 2016.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, moving from non-sexist views to sexist ones was associated with a 20 percentage point increase in support of Trump [129].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“For example, in one of the surveys, as respondents moved from a high level of acknowledgement of racism to a denial of racism, there was a 60-point increase in support of Trump.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“Among whites, Trump had a four point margin of voter support over Hilary Clinton among college graduates, but a nearly 40% margin among those without a college education.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
In the citing paper
“The analyses found that a denial of racism and a hostile sexism, rather than economic difficulties, were the key drivers of support for Trump, especially among whites with low levels of education.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [129]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 547
Piazza, J. A., & O’Rourke, L. (2024) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x24000400 · Cited by 8
American Party Women Redux: Stability in Partisan Gender Gaps
Barnes, T. D., Beall, V. D., & Cassese, E. C. (2021) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096520002012 · Cited by 7
Hanley, E. (2021) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13049 · Cited by 7
Roepert, L. (2022) · Sozialtheorie · doi:10.14361/9783839462720 · Cited by 8
Sloan, M. M., Haner, M., Pickett, J. T., & Cullen, F. T. (2024) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azae025 · Cited by 7
White Media Attitudes in the Trump Era
Thompson, J. (2020) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x20943566 · Cited by 8
“Literature on racial priming demonstrates that racist attitudes or resentment may be the driving factor behind exposure to conservative media and affect towards Trump (Schaffner et al., 2018; Valentino, 1999).”
BackgroundThe 2020 Presidential Election Verdict
Burden, B. C. (2021) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12715 · Cited by 7
Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and the Racialization of Attitudes Toward Descriptive Representation
Lucas, J. C., & Mohamed, H. S. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211022620 · Cited by 7
“Significant evidence points to race, ethnicity, and gender playing a key role in recent presidential elections, especially in 2016 (Cassese & Barnes, 2019; Jardina, 2019; Lee, 2020; Michelson & Lavariega Monforti, 2018; Schaffner et al., 2018; Wilkinson, 2018).”
BackgroundShifting Racial Schemas: From Post‐racial to New “Old‐fashioned” Racism
Flores‐González, N., & Salgado, C. D. (2021) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12474 · Cited by 7
The Pictures in Their Heads: How U.S. Mayors Think About Racial Inequality
Einstein, K. L., Puig, L. G., & Piston, S. (2020) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/1078087420908653 · Cited by 7
“Some mayors, particularly those in White-majority cities, may know that acknowledging racial inequality is unappealing to a subset of White voters (Perry 1991; Schaffner, Macwilliams, and Nteta 2018), and may face electoral incentives to avoid recognition of racial inequality.”
BackgroundCity-exit and Community-fit: Finding One’s ‘Place’ in Australia
Ragusa, A. T. (2022) · The International Journal of Community and Social Development · doi:10.1177/25166026211070374 · Cited by 7
“Data supports international research documenting rurality’s persistent conservatism (Lay, 2012; Oberhauser et al., 2019; Scala & Johnson, 2017; Schaffner et al., 2018; Smith & Hanley, 2018) grounded in class, sexuality and ethnicity.”
BackgroundInfluentialLeft Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws It Can Cause
Zigerell, L. J. (2019) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096519000854 · Cited by 7
“…on gender attitudes and support for Donald Trump in Bracic, Israel-Trummel, and Shortle (2018); Cassese and Barnes (2018); Cassese and Holman (2019); Frasure-Yokley (2018); Knuckey (2018); Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta (2018); Setzler and Yanus (2018); and Valentino, Wayne, and Oceno (2018).”
BackgroundPropaganda and Politics in Developing Countries: Evidence from IndiaPreprint
Blakeslee, D. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2542702 · Cited by 7
Whitehead, A. L., & Perry, S. L. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/ejats · Cited by 7
“What’s Her Job?” Agentic Women, Sexism, and the Consequences for Political Candidate Emergence
Chen, P., Thomas, M., Gosselin, T., & Harell, A. (2024) · Journal of Women, Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2024.2359140 · Cited by 2
“…men may be more likely to endorse sexist beliefs than women (Campbell, Schellenberg, and Senn 1997), and that those who identify with more conservative parties are more likely to be explicitly sexist than are partisans of centrist and left-leaning parties (Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018).”
Allegations of Democratic Election Fraud and Support for Political Violence Among Republicans
Piazza, J. A. (2024) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x241263083 · Cited by 6
“These actions were important for galvanizing Trump ’ s base of supporters (Glick et al., 2002; Schaffner et al., 2018; Sides et al., 2019; Tolbert et al., 2018).”
Racism as a Public Health Crisis: How Declarations Shape Local TV News Attention to Racism
Moreira, N. D. P., Moore, S. T., Floyd, B., Fowler, E. F., & Gollust, S. E. (2025) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780874251330267 · Cited by 6
“…parties have very different perspectives on issues of race, which was further exacerbated during the Trump presidency that frequently featured rhetoric that activated racism and sexism (Cassese and Barnes 2019; Schaffner 2018; Schaffner, MacWilliams and Nteta 2018; Sides, Tesler and Vavreck 2018).”
The Symbolic Politics of Status in the MAGA Movement
Koenig, B., & Mendelberg, T. (2025) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592725102090 · Cited by 6
Donald Trump, Access Hollywood , and the Rhetorical Performance of Aggrieved White Masculinity
Bostdorff, D. M. (2022) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2022.2118549 · Cited by 6
Social Imagery and Judicial Legitimacy: Evidence From Evangelical Christians
Badas, A., & Schmidt, E. R. (2023) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129231197207 · Cited by 6
Sommer, U., & Franco, I. (2024) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773923000371 · Cited by 6
“…victory, a large body of research found a significant link among White voters between voting for Trump and anti-minorities sentiments, and in particular anti-immigration sentiment (Buyuker et al., 2021; Cepuran and Berry, 2022; Jardina, 2019; Schaffner et al., 2018; Schaffner and Clark, 2017).”
The Activation of Anti-Asian Attitudes on Vote Choice
Chan, N. K. M., & Leung, V. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09980-4 · Cited by 6
Populism’s Efforts to De-legitimize the Vital Center and the Implications for Liberal Democracy
Kivisto, P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95945-0_12 · Cited by 6
Algara, C., & Hale, I. (2020) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102207 · Cited by 6
Trump Knows Best: Donald Trump’s Rejection of Expertise and the 2020 Presidential Election
Brewer, M. D. (2020) · Society · doi:10.1007/s12115-020-00544-w · Cited by 6
“More important for this study, the inclusion of the various racial, immigration, and status variables always reduced education level to statistical non-significance (Abramowitz 2018; Hooghe and Dassonneville 2018; Mutz 2018; Schaffner et al. 2018; Setzler and Yanus 2018; Sides et al. 2018).”
BackgroundDeMora, S. L., Lindke, C. A., Merolla, J. L., et al. (2022) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfac012 · Cited by 6
Mobilizing the White: White Nationalism and Congressional Politics in the American South
Weiner, A., & Zellman, A. (2022) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x221088844 · Cited by 6
“White fears of losing majority status and resentment of out-group advancement have been found to drive support for the Tea Party Movement and former President Donald Trump (Abramowitz & McCoy, 2019; Blum & Parker, 2019; Knowles et al., 2013; Mutz, 2018; Schaffner et al., 2018; Skocpol & Williamson, 2012; Tope et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Mediating Role of Information Search in the Relationship Between Prejudice and Voting Behavior
Ditonto, T. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12599 · Cited by 7
Civility, gender, and gendered nationalism in the age of Trump
Deckman, M. M. (2020) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2020.1842771 · Cited by 6
“Recent research shows a clear and independent linkage between holding sexist views and voting for and positively evaluating Donald Trump in the 2016 elections (Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Valentino, Wayne, and Oceno 2018; Cassese and Holman 2019).”
BackgroundGiurge, L. M., Lin, E. H.-L., & Effron, D. A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104144 · Cited by 3
The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
(2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.012 · Cited by 5
Baker, J. O., Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/thvde · Cited by 6
Martel, F. A., Moniz, P., Ashokkumar, A., & Swann, W. B. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12979 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, outgroup hostility was a stronger predictor of voting for Trump than economic insecurity, education level, and other variables (Fording & Schram, 2018; Schaffner et al., 2018; 14679221 , 0 , D o w n l o a d e d fr o m h tt p s :// on li n e li b r a r y . w il e y . c o m / do i/ 10 .”
BackgroundTrump’s new America and the question of fascism
Kaul, N., & Buzan, B. G. (2026) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481261418500 · Cited by 6
“This idea of working-class resentment at the economic failure of liberal democracy persists despite the overwhelming empirical evidence to the contrary (for refutation in aftermath of Trump 1.0 win, see Schaffner et al., 2018).”
InfluentialMason, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.23 · Cited by 8
Toeing the Party Line: The Asymmetric Influence of Feminism on Partisans' Participation
Oceno, M., & Morell, S. (2023) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123423000510 · Cited by 5
“…has called attention to how attitudes about gender, such as modern or hostile sexism, shaped voter decision-making and behaviour in the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections (Cassese and Barnes 2019; Oceno, Valentino, and Wayne 2023; Schaffner 2022; Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Utych 2021).”
BackgroundKim, C., & Junn, J. (2024) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x24000345 · Cited by 6
Upper Class Bias and Class Conflict in America
Witko, C. (2017) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2017-0008 · Cited by 5
The Limits of Black Politics in the Post–Civil Rights Era
Sekou, B. D. (2020) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12602 · Cited by 5
Existential Threats of Immigration and Terrorism Predict Voting for Brexit and Trump
Blanchard, A., Kibowski, F., & Dunn, T. J. (2020) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-020-00245-x · Cited by 5
Geographic earnings inequality by race, 1960–2016
Nutting, A. W. (2022) · Journal of Regional Science · doi:10.1111/jors.12623 · Cited by 5
Donald Trump and the Democratic Shift among College-Educated Suburban White Voters
Schaffner, B. F., & Gaus, K. (2023) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2023-2004 · Cited by 18
Self-citationThe role of sexism in holding politicians accountable for sexual misconduct
Longdon, B., & BANDUCCI, S. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2023.1064902 · Cited by 5
The Crucial Role of Race in Twenty-First Century US Political Realignment
Barber, M. J., & Pope, J. C. (2024) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfad063 · Cited by 6
The perceived impact of the 2016 election: A mediation model predicting health outcomes
Koerten, H. R., Bogusch, L. M., Varga, A. V., & O’Brien, W. H. (2019) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1065 · Cited by 5
The Counties that Counted: Could 2020 Repeat 2016 in the US Electoral College?
Agnew, J. A., & Shin, M. (2019) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2019-0040 · Cited by 5
Carmines, E. G., & Schmidt, E. R. (2020) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096520000876 · Cited by 4
“In 2016, support for Donald Trump was associated with negative racial attitudes and “hostile sexism” (Abramowitz 2018; Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018).”
BackgroundResultMedenica, V. E., & Fowler, M. (2021) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2021-0013 · Cited by 5
Bell, R., & Borelli, G. (2021) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2021.1955216 · Cited by 4
A Dilemma of Dogma: Specifying the Personality Root of Sexual Prejudice
Miller, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2019.1624454 · Cited by 5
Not swinging together: Partisan defection in the age of political polarization
Harris, S. (2020) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1080/03623319.2020.1735856 · Cited by 5
“…of white southerners towards the Republican party (Valentino & Sears, 2005) and recent applications of this theory to vote switching suggest prejudicial attitudes continue to predict Republican conversion at the ballot box (Mutz, 2018; Piston, 2010; Schaffner et al., 2018; Sides et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialKersting, J. B. (2021) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2021.1946100 · Cited by 4
“…events in American politics have only exacerbated this divide, such as the emergence of Donald Trump as the leader of the Republican Party with his extremely conservative stances and rhetoric on issues of race and gender (Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Sides, Tesler, and Vavreck 2018).”
BackgroundAlgara, C., & Hale, I. (2023) · The Journal of Race Ethnicity and Politics · doi:10.1017/rep.2023.16 · Cited by 4
“In line with recent studies of racial attitudes and vote choice (e.g., Algara and Hale 2019, 2020; Schaffner et al. 2018), we generate a novel measure of racial attitudes that have not been used in prior studies of political participation.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialOnline knowledge production in polarized political memes: The case of critical race theory
Walters, A., Ammari, T., Garimella, K., & Jhaver, S. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241252591 · Cited by 12
“After the election of Donald Trump as the US President, several studies have indicated that explicit (Gantt Shafer 2017) or nearly-explicit racism (Schaffner et al. 2018) became a usable mechanism for Republicans in ways that it has not been since the 1950s and 60s (Mendelberg 2001).”
Sexual disgust sensitivity mediates the sex difference in support of censoring hate speech
Zhang, J. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.028 · Cited by 4
The Difference in Being Poor in Red States versus Blue States
Gilman, M. E. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108631662.004 · Cited by 4
Interregional and intraregional variability of intergroup attitudes predict online hostility
Rosenbusch, H., Evans, A. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2301 · Cited by 7
“Scholars have argued that the USA is experiencing an increase in ideological polarization (Twenge, Honeycutt, Prislin, & Sherman, 2016) and that treatment of minorities poses one of the most divisive topics today (Schaffner, MacWilliams, & Nteta, 2018).”
BackgroundWalls, Cages, and Family Separation: Race and Immigration Policy in the Trump Era
Wallace, S. J., & Zepeda‐Millán, C. (2020) · Cited by 4
Byers, J. S., & Shay, L. P. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211041319 · Cited by 4
“This aligns with recent research which shows that the public has highly polarized opinions about President Trump and his administration (e.g., Abramowitz & McCoy, 2019; Evers et al., 2019; Schaffner et al., 2018).”
ResultThe Contingent Effects of Sexism in Primary Elections
Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2021) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129211043134 · Cited by 4
“Numerous studies of the 2016 election find strong correlations between sexism and vote choice (Bock, Byrd-Craven, and Burkley 2017; Bracic, Israel-Trummel, and Shortle 2019; Knuckey 2019; Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Sides, Tesler, and Vavreck 2020).”
BackgroundMutz, D. C. (2021) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2021-2028 · Cited by 4
Fabian, M., Breunig, R. V., & Jan-emmanuel De Neve, A. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2894 · Cited by 4
Wright, G. W., & Volodarsky, S. (2022) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12517 · Cited by 5
Economics, COVID, Election Forecasting: Did Trump Escape Blame?
Tien, C., & Lewis‐Beck, M. S. (2023) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x231168584 · Cited by 4
“He was overtly racist, sexist, and xenophobic on the campaign trail and in office, which actually won him support (see for example Jardina and Traugott 2019; Schaffner et al. 2018; Jardina 2019).”
BackgroundMuhammad, E. A. (2023) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-023-10175-2 · Cited by 4
“2019) and through the use of racist and bigoted language, Trump amassed a wave of popular support that resulted in his winning the 2016 presidential election (Schaffner et al. 2018) and was poised to earn reelection in 2020 (Devega 2019).”
BackgroundGender, Sexism, and Contempt in Candidate Evaluation
Ditonto, T., & Mattes, K. (2024) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2024.2300934 · Cited by 6
“Respondents high in ambivalent sexism were more likely to vote for Donald Trump and less likely to have voted for Hilary Clinton (Bracic, Israel-Trummel, and Shortle 2019; Cassese and Holman 2018; Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Valentino, Wayne, and Oceno 2018).”
Rethinking the Debate Over Recent Polling Failures
Toff, B. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1440908 · Cited by 4
Zeedan, R. (2019) · J — Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal · doi:10.3390/j2010007 · Cited by 4
Divided America in Elizabeth Strout’sthe Burgess Boys
Tager, M. (2019) · Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction · doi:10.1080/00111619.2019.1601611 · Cited by 4
Ready for Hillary?: Explicit and Implicit Sexism in the 2016 Presidential Election
Barnello, M. A., Bitecofer, R., & Kidd, Q. (2019) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2019-0018 · Cited by 4
“Additional research using a four-factor “hostile sexism” score (Schaffner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018) to measure sex-based attitudes among 2016 likely voters finds that voters with the largest hostile sexism scores had a probability of voting for Donald Trump of 0.66 compared to a 0.34…”
MethodInfluentialUnipolar Dispensations: Exceptionalism, Empire, and the End of One America
O’Donnell, S. J. (2018) · Political Theology · doi:10.1080/1462317x.2018.1484986 · Cited by 4
Toward a Feminist Future: A Political Strategy for Fighting Backlash and Advancing Gender Equity
Cohen, N. L. (2019) · Signs · doi:10.1086/704987 · Cited by 4
Franks, A. S., & Hesami, F. (2021) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc11030113 · Cited by 4
“In addition, racial bias is a strong predictor of Trump support [55], and similar far-right leaders may also exploit racial animus to weaken the social safety net in other nations facing ongoing immigration crises [56].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Ideological Asymmetry of White Identity
Townsend, K., Eyre, K., Walker, H., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/732974 · Cited by 3
Strawbridge, M., Mohamed, H. S., & Lucas, J. C. (2024) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-024-09970-6 · Cited by 3
“4 In 2016, Trump’s language around “special treatment” for marginalized groups (Jardina, 2019; Mutz, 2018) drew upon sexist and racist beliefs among some of the public (Schaffner et al., 2018; Sides et al., 2018).”
Disentangling different types of sexist attitudes and vote choice in Germany
Fortin‐Rittberger, J., & Eder, C. (2025) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2025.2508382 · Cited by 3
“…role (Bock, Byrd-Craven, and Burkley 2017; Cassese and Barnes 2019; Cassese and Holman 2016; Frasure-Yokley 2018; Godbole, Malvar, and Valian 2019; Knuckey 2019; Ratli ff et al. 2019; Scha ff ner 2022a; Scha ff ner, MacWilliams, and Nteta 2018; Valentino, Wayne, and Oceno 2018; Winter 2023).”
Quantifying generalized trust in individuals and counties using language
Giorgi, S., Jones, J. J., Buffone, A. E. K., Eichstaedt, J. C., Crutchley, P., Yaden, D. B., Elstein, J. G., Zamani, M., Kregor, J., Smith, L. K., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1384262 · Cited by 5
“For test–retest reliability, results are shown in Table 4 and were comparable to longitudinal correlations for other personality”
Men's decline and rising support for hostile sexism: A survey experiment from South Korea
Kim, J. (2024) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103134 · Cited by 3
Landscapes, Fields, and Stages
Spillman, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95945-0_15 · Cited by 3
Jurecic, A. (2020) · Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture · doi:10.1215/15314200-8091801 · Cited by 3
Support for the Americans with Disabilities Act Among Nondisabled People
Friedman, C., & VanPuymbrouck, L. H. (2021) · Journal of Disability Policy Studies · doi:10.1177/10442073211023175 · Cited by 3
“For example, White women overwhelming voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election (CNN, 2018) despite his history of sexism (Boyer, 2017; Cohen, 2017); the majority of which were motivated by racism and sexism rather than economic difficulties (Schaffner et al., 2018).”
BackgroundHow he won: Using machine learning to understand Trump’s 2016 victory
He, Z., Camobreco, J. F., & Perkins, K. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-021-00147-3 · Cited by 3
“Most empirical studies [10, 20, 24, 25] in this line of research conclude that it was these factors, not economic conditions, that principally explain voter choice in 2016.”
BackgroundThe Dirtbag Left: Bernie Bros and the Persistence of Left-Wing Misogyny
Menon, P. T., & DeCook, J. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-83734-1_19 · Cited by 3
LaPoe, B. R., LaPoe, V. L., Olson, C. S. C., Hazarika, B., & Woellert, A. (2022) · Electronic News · doi:10.1177/19312431221125761 · Cited by 3
“Email: lapoe@ohio.edu The 2018 midterm elections saw the most diverse House of Representatives elected, based on race, gender, religion, sexual orientation and political diversity (Schaffner et al., 2018).”
BackgroundLonging for the “Good Old Days” or longing for a racist and sexist past?
Goidel, S., Goidel, K., & Madsen, B. (2024) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680241246387 · Cited by 3
“Concomitantly, racist and sexist voters over-whelmingly supported Trump in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections (Hooghe and Dassonneville 2018; Piazza and Van Doren 2023; Schaffner et al. 2018).”
Stuart Hall's Relational Political Sociology: A Heuristic for Right-Wing Studies
Leeds, T. (2024) · Journal of Right-Wing Studies · doi:10.5070/rw3.1491 · Cited by 3
Plutopopulism: Wealth and Trump’s Financial Base
Kates, S., MANNING, E., Mendelberg, T., & Wasow, O. (2025) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055425000061 · Cited by 6
“…Trump supporters disproportionately endorse ethnocentric attitudes about identity and status, especially regarding race and immigration (Hopkins and Washington 2020; Mutz 2018b; Reny, Collingwood, and Valenzuela 2019; Schaffner, Macwilliams, and Nteta 2018; Sides, Tesler, and Vavreck 2019).”
The Culture of (Dis)Contentment
Knoedler, J. T. (2019) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2019.1594496 · Cited by 3
“10 In one notable example, Bill Clinton teamed with the Republican Congress to end the welfare entitlement.”
BackgroundInfluentialGender and Race in American Elections: From the Pathos of Prediction to the Power of Possibility1
Hughey, M. W. (2020) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12609 · Cited by 3
Singh, M. J., Gray, T. L., Hall, T., & Downey, G. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74579-4_27 · Cited by 3
Ukonu, M. O., Ugwuoke, J. C., & Ifeanyichukwu, J. C. (2020) · Journal of International Communication · doi:10.1080/13216597.2020.1793796 · Cited by 3
Chevrette, R., & Duerringer, C. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_10 · Cited by 3
Flirt mit dem Autoritären: Trumpismus als schöpferische Zerstörung
Lammert, C., Siewert, M. Β., & Vormann, B. (2021) · Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33263-1_5 · Cited by 3
Hodge, E. (2018) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 2
Unhealthy Democracy: How Partisan Politics is Killing Rural America
Shepherd, M. E. (2021) · Cited by 3
Unchurched Christian Nationalism and the 2016 U.S. Presidential ElectionPreprint
Stroope, S., Froese, P., Rackin, H., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/k3br5 · Cited by 3
Effects or use?: Examining the over-time effects of media use and racial resentment
Hmielowski, J. D., DuBosar, E., Beam, M. A., & Hutchens, M. J. (2024) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2024.2383431 · Cited by 2
Voter Sexism and Electoral Penalties for Women Candidates: Evidence from Four Democracies
Shorrocks, R., Ralph-Morrow, E., & de Geus, R. A. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425000390 · Cited by 2
“Most of this scholarship is from the USA, showing associations between hostile sexism and support for Donald Trump in 2016 (Cassese and Barnes 2019; Schaffner et al. 2018); antipathy towards female congressional candidates in 2016 (Winter, 2023); endorsement of Republican House candidates in the…”
Antisemitism, Israel, and political ideology on the American college campus
Wright, G. W., Hecht, S., & Saxe, L. (2025) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2025.2575435 · Cited by 2
Dentler, K., Gschwend, T., & Hünlich, D. (2021) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102309 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaffner, B. F., Macwilliams, M., & Nteta, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Venue
- Political Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-34
- ISSN
- 0032-3195 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-165X
- OpenAlex
- W2795844998
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 34
- FWCI
- 391.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Political Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Keywords
- 2016 US presidential election, white voters, racial polarization, sexism, racism, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, educational gaps, party identification, populism, protectionism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review