The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services
Open accessAbstract
After treatment completion, gynaecological cancer survivors may face long‐term challenges and late effects, specific to this disease. Available research on supportive care needs of women with gynaecological cancer is limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs within a population of gynaecological cancer survivors. Eight hundred and two women participated in a population‐based mail survey in 2004 (56% response rate). The questionnaire included a validated instrument to assess 45 need items across multiple supportive care domains, and a range of measures to evaluate related correlates consistent with a social–ecological perspective. Forty‐three per cent of respondents reported having at least one moderate‐ or high‐level unmet need. The five highest included needing help with fear about the cancer spreading (17%), concerns about the worries of those close to them (15%), uncertainty about the future (14%), lack of energy/tiredness (14%), and not being able to do things they used to do (14%). Subgroups of women with higher odds of reporting ‘some’ unmet needs across multiple supportive care domains include those who, are not in remission, live with lymphoedema or are unable to work due to illness. Odds were also higher for women who had undergone more recent treatment, and who lived in rural or remote locations. Further assistance with the top specific concerns of gynaecological cancer survivors is recommended. Identified subgroups with higher needs are important targets for support. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Mapping the quality of life and unmet needs of urban women with metastatic breast cancer
ARANDA, S., SCHOFIELD, P., WEIH, L., YATES, P., MILNE, D., FAULKNER, R., & VOUDOURIS, N. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00541.x · Cited by 215
Cited by
Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments
Vodermaier, A., Linden, W., & Siu, C. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp336 · Cited by 541
A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care
Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2115 · Cited by 289
Dilworth, S., Higgins, I., Parker, V., Kelly, B., & Turner, J. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3474 · Cited by 286
Fiszer, C., Dolbeault, S., Sultan, S., & Brédart, A. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3432 · Cited by 263
Identifying the most prevalent unmet needs of cancer survivors in Australia: A systematic review
Lisy, K., Langdon, L., Piper, A., & Jefford, M. (2019) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1111/ajco.13176 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Beesley, V., Eakin, E., Steginga, S., Aitken, J., Dunn, J., & Battistutta, D.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 392-400
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1529266245
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.1249
- The paper
- Beesley, V., Eakin, E., Steginga, S., Aitken, J., Dunn, J., & Battistutta, D. (2008). Unmet needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: implications for developing community support services. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.