Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment

Open access
Chachaj, Angelika, Małyszczak, Krzysztof, Pyszel, Krystian, Lukas, Joanna, Tarkowski, Radosław, Pudełko, Marek, Andrzejak, Ryszard, Szuba, Andrzej·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with worse physical and emotional functioning of breast cancer survivors with upper extremity lymphedema. Methods: 1250 sets of questionnaires consisting of WHO‐DAS II, EORTC QLQ‐C30, EORTC QLQ‐BR23 and GHQ‐30 were mailed to women who underwent a breast cancer surgery at the Lower Silesian Oncology Center in Poland between January 1998 and December 2005. Results and conclusions: The response rate was 33.47%. 117 women were included into a lymphedema group and 211 into a group without this complication. Women with lymphedema were more disabled (overall disability (DAS) score 39.78 versus 34.67; p<0.001), reported symptoms from the upper extremity (shoulder or arm pain and difficulties in arm movement) and from the operated breast (pain and swelling) 2–3 times more often, experienced poorer quality of life (global quality of life (QOL) score 0.50 versus 0.57; p=0.005) and higher psychological distress (GHQ score 10.61 versus 8.01; p=0.007) in comparison to breast cancer survivors without lymphedema. The factors associated with higher DAS score, higher GHQ score and lower QOL score in women with lymphedema were as following: pain in the upper limb (mainly shoulder and arm), pain in operated breast, difficulties with arm movement, localization of lymphedema within the hand or in operated breast, a history of dermatolymphangitis and of receiving chemotherapy. Severity of lymphedema, younger age, BMI and localization of lymphedema within the dominant limb were not considerably related to worse outcomes in these women. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1573

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Chachaj, A., Małyszczak, K., Pyszel, K., Lukas, J., Tarkowski, R., Pudełko, M., Andrzejak, R., & Szuba, A.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-27
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
299-305
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2009330149
Cited by
246
References
1
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.1573
The paper
Chachaj, A., Małyszczak, K., Pyszel, K., Lukas, J., Tarkowski, R., Pudełko, M., Andrzejak, R., & Szuba, A. (2010). Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1573

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.