Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 696 of the 696 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review

Federici, Stefano, Bracalenti, Marco, Meloni, Fabio, Luciano, Juan V.·2017·Disability and Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review examines research and practical applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a basis for establishing specific criteria for evaluating relevant international scientific literature. The aims were to establish the extent of international dissemination and use of WHODAS 2.0 and analyze psychometric research on its various translations and adaptations. In particular, we wanted to highlight which psychometric features have been investigated, focusing on the factor structure, reliability, and validity of this instrument. METHOD: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a search for publications focused on "whodas" using the ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases. RESULTS: We identified 810 studies from 94 countries published between 1999 and 2015. WHODAS 2.0 has been translated into 47 languages and dialects and used in 27 areas of research (40% in psychiatry). CONCLUSIONS: The growing number of studies indicates increasing interest in the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing individual functioning and disability in different settings and individual health conditions. The WHODAS 2.0 shows strong correlations with several other measures of activity limitations; probably due to the fact that it shares the same disability latent variable with them. Implications for Rehabilitation WHODAS 2.0 seems to be a valid, reliable self-report instrument for the assessment of disability. The increasing interest in use of the WHODAS 2.0 extends to rehabilitation and life sciences rather than being limited to psychiatry. WHODAS 2.0 is suitable for assessing health status and disability in a variety of settings and populations. A critical issue for rehabilitation is that a single "minimal clinically important .difference" score for the WHODAS 2.0 has not yet been established.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177

Cites

696 of 696 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 696 references

Research works printed but not linked: 154

  1. WHO (World Health Organization). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2001.
  2. WHO (World Health Organization). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva, CH: WHO; 1980.
  3. 10.1080/09687599826579 · doi:10.1080/09687599826579
  4. 10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80021-X · doi:10.1016/s1479-3547(01)80021-x
  5. 10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_4
  6. Groce NE. Martha’s Vineyard: everyone spoke sign language here. Deaf Am. 1980;33.
  7. 10.1201/b11821 · doi:10.1201/b11821
  8. Morris J, editor. Pride against prejudice: transforming attitudes to disabilities. Philadelphia (PA): New Society Publishers; 1991.
  9. WHO (World Health Organization). WHO Psychiatric Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO/DAS): with a guide to its use. Geneva (CH): WHO; 1988.
  10. WHO (World Health Organization). WHODAS-II – Disability Assessment Schedule Training Manual: a guide to administration. Geneva, CH: WHO; 2004.
  11. WHO (World Health Organization). ICF-CY: international classification of functioning, disability and health – children and youth version. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2007.
  12. WHO (World Health Organization), ESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok, TH: United Nations; 2008.
  13. 10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9
  14. Castrejón I, Silva-Fernández L, Bombardier C, et al. Clinical composite measures of disease activity for diagnosis and followup of undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol. 2011;87:48–53.
  15. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.004 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.004
  16. Federici S, Meloni F, Lo Presti A. International literature review on WHODAS II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II). Life Span Disabil. 2009;12:83–110.
  17. 10.4274/Npa.y7310 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00898.x · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00898.x
  19. 10.5812/traumamon.28529 · doi:10.5812/traumamon.28529
  20. Baron M, Panopalis P, Caron J, et al. McGill Early Arthritis Research Group (McGill). Canadian French Version of the World Health Organization Disease [sic.] Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II): Translation, Test-Retest Stability, and Internal Consistency in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;32:1403.
  21. Chavarriaga R Hurtado MN Bolaños M et al. Multidisciplinary design of suitable assistive technologies for motor disabilities in Colombia. Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC): IEEE 2014 2014 Oct 10-13; San José CA; 2014. · doi:10.1109/ghtc.2014.6970310
  22. de Castro SS, Leite CF. World health assessment disability schedule “WHODAS 2.0” – Apresentação de Instrumento de Aferição de Funcionalidade. Cadernos De Educação, Saúde E Fisioterapia. 2015;2:n.a. DOI:10.18310%2F2358-8306.v2n3suplem · doi:10.18310/2358-8306.v2n3suplem
  23. Doyle PJ, Prieto L, Epping-Jordan JE, et al. Measurement properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) in stroke survivors. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:321.
  24. Garin O Nieto M Almansa J et al. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in Chronic Clinical and Rehabilitative Samples. 16th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research: ISOQOL 2009; 2009 Oct 28–31; New Orleans LA; 2009.
  25. Hofmane A, Mārtinsone K, Perepjolkina V, et al. Relationship between psychotic symptoms and some aspects of functioning. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:798.
  26. Huerta-Ramírez R, Molina-Serrano A, Capllonch-Carrión A, et al. Opening new ways: model of care for severe mental disorders in the Brief Hospitalization Unit at Complejo Asistencial Benito Menni. Euro Global Summit and Medicare Expo on Psychiatry 2015 Jul 20-22; Barcelona, ES; 2015.
  27. Koļesņikova J, Perepjolkina V, Mārtinsone K, et al. Psychometric properties of the functioning scales for the Latvian Clinical Personality Test (LCPT). J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:775–776.
  28. Küçükdeveci AA, Öztuna D, Elhan AH, et al. Factorial structure of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:279.
  29. Lachmann A, Haasen C, Stallwitz A, et al. Management of high risk opiate addicts in Europe (Risk Opiate addicts Study – Europe). Eur J Public Health. 2004;14:27.
  30. Leonardi M, Schiavolin S, Giovannetti A, et al. Impact of migraine and chronic migraine on disability and reduced productivity: a cross-sectional study. Neurol Sci. 2012;33:221–222.
  31. Magistrale G, Medori R, Cadavid D, et al. Fatigue as the best predictor variable of self-rated disability in a sample of MS patients. Multiple Sclerosis J. 2013;19:984.
  32. Mavreas V, Christodoulopoulou A, Karokis A, et al. Assessment of the impact of quetiapine treatment on psychopathology, health related quality of life and disability in patients with schizophrenia in Greece. The Square study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;7:S247.
  33. Ošleja A, Hofmane A, Mārtinsone K, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and functioning in a Latvian community sample. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:798.
  34. Ozoliņa Z, Hofmane A, Mārtinsone K, et al. Relationship between anxiety and some aspects of functioning in a Latvian community sample. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:798–799.
  35. Ponce Rodriguez CE, Cervantes Castillo AD, Montero Fuentes JL. Comportamiento de variables socio-demograficas y del ejercicio fisico en adultos mayores. Municipio Pampan. Estado Trujillo. Revista Cubana De Tecnología De La Salud. 2014;325:1–11.
  36. Prieto L, Epping-Jordan JE, Doyle P, et al. The factor structure of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II). Qual Life Res. 2000;9:320.
  37. Roy MJ, Francis J, Banks-Williams L, et al. The ViRTICo Trial: virtual reality therapy and imaging in combat veterans. CyberPsychol Behav. 2009;12:92.
  38. Wolf-Ostermann K, Gräske J. Living independently with intensive support (WmI): long-term results of a new housing project for people with severe disabilities in Germany. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:29.
  39. 10.1055/s-0033-1363203 · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363203
  40. Yoon J-S. Genetic researches for Alzheimer’s disease in Korea. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19:48.
  41. Chowdhary N, Rahman A, Verdeli H, et al. Trials of interventions for people with depression. In: Thornicroft G, Patel V, editors. Global mental health trials. Oxford (US): Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 160–178.
  42. Dommaraju P. Perspectives on old age in India. In: Jones G, Guilmoto CZ, editors. 40% of the world: demographic change in China, India and Indonesia. New York (NY): Springer; 2015.
  43. Gibert K, Annicchiarico R, Cortés U, et al. Knowledge discovery on functional disabilities: clustering based on rules versus other approaches. In: Engelbrecht R, Geissbuhler A, Lovis C, Mihalas G, editors. Connecting medical informatics and bio-informatics. Amsterdam (NL): IOS Press; 2005. p. 163–168.
  44. Madeddu F, Bonalume L, Dainese S, et al. The global functioning evaluation: Kennedy Axis V compared with WHODAS 2.0. In: Pracana C, editor. Psychology applications & developments. Lisboa (PT): Science Press; 2014. p. 132.
  45. 10.1007/978-3-319-08825-9_14 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08825-9_14
  46. Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Chatterji S, et al. Quantifying individual levels of health: definitions, concepts, and measurement issues. In: Murray CJL, Evans DB, editors. Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2003. p. 301–318.
  47. 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_61 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_61
  48. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Villanueva M, et al. WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness 2000–2001. In: Murray CJL, Evans DB, editors. Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization; 2003. p. 761–796.
  49. von Korff M, Andrews G, Delves M. Assessing activity limitations and disability among adults. In: Regier DA, Narrow WE, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ, editors. The conceptual evolution of DSM-5. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2011. p. 163–188.
  50. International Labour Organization. Employment situation of people with disabilities: towards improved statistical information. Geneva (CH): International Labour Organization; 2007.
  51. Badr HE, Abd El Aziz HM. Role of gender in coping capabilities among young visually disabled students. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2007;82:365–377.
  52. Wang L-E, Zhou J, Jin H. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in mental disability assessment. Chin Ment Health J. 2013;27:121–125.
  53. 10.1921/swssr.v18i1.847 · doi:10.1921/swssr.v18i1.847
  54. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008884 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008884
  55. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000032 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000032
  56. Yoon J-S, Kim J-M, Shin I-S, et al. Development of Korean version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II-K) in Community Dwelling Elders. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2004;43:86–92.
  57. Bromet EJ, Havenaar JM, Tintle N, et al. Suicide ideation, plans and attempts in Ukraine: findings from the Ukraine World Mental Health Survey. Psychol Med. 2007;37:807–819. · DOI
  58. Uluğ B, Ertuğrul A, Gögüs A, et al. Yetiyitimi Değerlendirme Çizelgesinin (WHO-DAS-II) Şizofreni Hastalar’nda Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği [Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-II (WHO-DAS-II) in schizophrenia]. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2001;12:121–130.
  59. Peltzer K, Phaswana-Mafuya N. Levels of ability and functioning of persons living with HIV and AIDS using the WHO DAS II in a South African context. J Soc Dev Afr. 2008;23:33–53.
  60. Adegbaju DA, Olagunju AT, Uwakwe R. Profile and correlates of disability among bipolar affective disorder patients attending the outpatient clinic of a Nigerian hospital. Nigerian J Psychiatry. 2015;12:24–31.
  61. 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.19 · doi:10.4314/ahs.v15i1.19
  62. 10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00325.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. Belio C, Prouteau A, Kolleck M, et al. Évaluation de la restriction de participation dans le cas du handicap cognitif avec la GMAP (grille de mesure des limitations d’activité et de la restriction de la participation issue de la CIF de l’OMS). J Réadapt Méd: Prat Form Méd Phys Réadapt. 2014;34:91–104.
  64. Bellack AS, Green MF, Cook JA, et al. Assessment of community functioning in people with Schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses: a white paper based on an NIMH-sponsored workshop. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:805–822.
  65. Bonnewyn A, Bruffaerts R, Van Oyen H, et al. Impact des troubles mentaux sur le fonctionnement quotidien de la population belge. Resultats de l’etude “European Study on Epidemiology of Mental Disorders” (ESEMeD) [The Impact of Mental Disorders on Daily Functioning in the Belgian Community. Results of the Study “European Study on Epidemiology of Mental Disorders” (ESEMeD)]. Rev Med Liege. 2005;60:849–854.
  66. 10.1177/0957154X14554370 · doi:10.1177/0957154x14554370
  67. 10.1007/s11136-014-0624-9 · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0624-9
  68. 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32830150e6 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0b013e32830150e6
  69. Contreras-Rojas J, Raventós-Vorst H. Caracterización clínica de familias costarricenses con trastorno afectivo bipolar [Clinical characterization of costarican families with bipolar disorder]. Acta Med Costarric. 2014;56:167–173.
  70. 10.1176/appi.ps.660208 · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.660208
  71. Gildengers A, Tatsuoka C, Bialko C, et al. Correlates of disability in depressed older adults with bipolar disorder. Cut Edge Psychiatry Pract. 2013;2013:332–338.
  72. Gold LH. DSM-5 and the assessment of functioning: the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Online. 2014;42:173–181.
  73. 10.2190/PM.45.2.c · doi:10.2190/pm.45.2.c
  74. Haggarty J, O’Connor B, Dubois S, et al. A pilot study of a Canadian shared mental health care programme: changes in patient symptoms and disability. Prim Care Commun Psychiatry. 2008;13:27–35.
  75. Halling Hastrup L, Nordentoft M, Hjorthoj C, et al. Does the EQ-5D measure quality of life in schizophrenia? J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011;14:187–196.
  76. He Q, Chen Y, Chow SL, et al. Negative symptoms predict the improvement of social functioning of patients with schizophrenia. Sichuan a ue ue ao Yi Xue Ban. 2014;45:284–288.
  77. Lépine J-P. Epidemiology, burden, and disability in depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:4–10.
  78. 10.1007/s40737-015-0037-2 · doi:10.1007/s40737-015-0037-2
  79. MaGPIe Research Group. The nature and prevalence of psychological problems in New Zealand primary healthcare: a report on Mental Health and General Practice Investigation (MaGPIe). N Z Med J. 2003;116:U379.
  80. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00962.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00962.x
  81. 10.1176/appi.ps.201400400 · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400400
  82. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318167a7cf · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e318167a7cf
  83. 10.4103/0253-7176.96164 · doi:10.4103/0253-7176.96164
  84. Özyüksel B, Uluğ B. Depresyon Tanisi Alan Hastalarda Kalinti Belirtilerin Yetiyitimi ile İlişkisi: 3 Aylık İzlem Çalışması [The association between disability and residual symptoms in depressive patients: a 3-month follow-up]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2007;18:323–332.
  85. Pinto-Meza A, Haro JM, Palacín C, et al. Impacto de los trastornos del ánimo, de ansiedad y de las enfermedades físicas crónicas en la calidad de vida de la poblacíon general de España. Resultados del estudio ESEMeD-España [The impact of mood and anxiety disorders, and physical chronic conditions in the quality of life of general population of Spain. Results of the ESEMeD-Spain study]. Actas Españolas De Psiquiatría. 2007;35:12–20.
  86. 10.1176/ps.2009.60.3.337 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01908.x · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01908.x
  88. Sieradzki A, Kiejna A. Ocena przydatności polskiej wersji kwestionariusza niesprawności społecznej Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule II (GSDS II) [Polish version of the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule II (GSDS II) – assessment of validity]. Psychiatr Pol. 2007;41:779–787.
  89. Sohn JH, Cho MJ, Lee JY, et al. Impact of mental disorders on functional disability: effect of non-psychotic common mental disorders on work loss days. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2008;47:81–87.
  90. 10.1016/S0924-9338(14)78321-X · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(14)78321-x
  91. Zhang Z, Deng H, Chen Y, et al. Cross-sectional survey of the relationship of symptomatology, disability and family burden among patients with schizophrenia in Sichuan, China. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014;26:22–29.
  92. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000101 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0000000000000101
  93. 10.1016/j.archger.2004.08.006 · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2004.08.006
  94. 10.1016/j.archger.2008.11.012 · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2008.11.012
  95. Jittawisuthikul O, Jirapramukpitak T, Sumpowthong K. Disability and late-life depression: a prospective population-based study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94:S145–S152.
  96. 10.1111/bjh.13018 · doi:10.1111/bjh.13018
  97. Shahar S, Omar A, Vanoh D, et al. Approaches in methodology for population-based longitudinal study on neuroprotective model for healthy longevity (TUA) among Malaysian Older Adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015;
  98. 10.4103/0975-2870.164975 · doi:10.4103/0975-2870.164975
  99. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.07.021 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.07.021
  100. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-176 · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-176
  101. 10.1186/s12916-015-0390-8 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Henao Lema CP, Pérez Parra JE. Modelo predictivo del grado de discapacidad en adultos con lesión medular: resultados desde el WHO-DAS II [A prediction model for establishing the disability degree in adults with spinal cord injury: results based on WHO-DAS II perspective]. Rev Ciencias De La Salud. 2011;9:159–172.
  103. Henao Lema CP, Pérez Parra JE. Validez de apariencia y concurrente de un instrumento de evaluación de la discapacidad en personas con lesión medular crónica, basado en el core set abreviado de la CIF [Appearance and Concurrent Validity of an Instrument for Assessing Disability in People with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Based on the ICF Core Set]. Rev Ciencias De La Salud. 2013;11:247–261.
  104. 10.1016/j.rh.2015.01.001 · doi:10.1016/j.rh.2015.01.001
  105. Jiménez-López JL, Kleinert-Altamirano API, Rodríguez-Galindo DM, et al. Impacto cualitativo de fallas cognitivas sobre las actividades de la vida diaria en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple de reciente diagnóstico [Qualitative impact of cognitive impairment on daily life activities of patients with recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis]. Arch Neuroci. 2012;17:165–171.
  106. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309032.208 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309032.208
  107. Lakra AA. Correlation between ageing, lesion location, cognition and perception of verticality with dynamic balance and disability in chronic stroke. J Rehabil. 2014;1:126–140.
  108. Lema CPH, Parra JEP. Situación de discapacidad de la población adulta con lesión medular de la ciudad de Manizales [Adult population with spinal cord injury disability situation in the city of manizales]. Rev Hacia La Promoción De La Salud. 2011;16:52–67.
  109. Magistrale G, Medori R, Cadavid D, et al. Assessing clinical correlates of self-rated disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J – Exp Transl Clin. 2015;1:1–9.
  110. 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.06.398 · doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2014.06.398
  111. 10.3109/09638280903336864 · doi:10.3109/09638280903336864
  112. 10.1136/bjo.2008.140269 · doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.140269
  113. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.050 · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.050
  114. 10.3109/09638280903290012 · doi:10.3109/09638280903290012
  115. Gimeno P, Nieto-Moreno M, Adán J, et al. Depression beyond the symptoms: its impact on functioning according to the biopsychosocial model of the ICF. J Affect Disord. 2006;91:S50–S51.
  116. Glickman LB, Chimatiro G, Laurie Neely D, et al. Community reintegration of patients with neurological disorders post discharge from the Kachere Rehabilitation Center, Malawi. J Global Health. 2015;12:35–39.
  117. Grant GM, O’Donnell ML, Spittal MJ, et al. Relationship between stressfulness of claiming for injury compensation and long-term recovery: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2014;71:446–453.
  118. 10.3109/09638280902918738a · doi:10.3109/09638280902918738a
  119. Saravagi M, Pattanaik M, Mohanty P. Disability evaluation in chronic low back pain in perspective of ministry of social justice and empowerment, who and other disability measures. J Rehabil. 2014;1:168–177.
  120. 10.1080/09638280600925910 · doi:10.1080/09638280600925910
  121. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.009 · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.009
  122. Davis LL, Mahaney-Price AF, Tabb KD, et al. Alabama veterans rural health initiative: a preliminary evaluation of unmet health care needs. J Rural Soc Sci. 2011;26:14–31.
  123. Gfroerer J, Dube SRP, King BAP, et al. Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged [greater-than or equal to]18 years with mental illness – United States, 2009–2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62:81–87.
  124. 10.3402/gha.v3i0.2128 · doi:10.3402/gha.v3i0.2128
  125. Madden RH, Fortune N, Madden RC. The need for an integrative measure of functioning (IMF). WHO-FIC Newslett. 2015;13:7–8.
  126. Sampaio RF, Silva FCM, Neves JA, et al. Avaliação dos (Evaluación de los) diferentes dominios do (del) modelo biopsicossocial da (de) Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (y Salud) [Evaluation of the different domains of biopsychosocial model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health]. Evol Pacientes Con Diabetes Mellitus Diálisis Peritoneal. 2013;20:134–140.
  127. Vázquez-Barquero JL, Vázquez Bourgón ME, Herrera Castanedo S, et al. Grupo Cantabria en Discapacidades. Versión en lengua española de un nuevo cuestionario de evaluación de discapacidades de la OMS (WHO-DAS-II): Fase initial de desarrollo y estudio piloto [Spanish version of the new World Health Organization Disablement Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS-II): Initial phase of development and pilot study]. Actas Españolas Psiquiatría. 2000;28:77–87.
  128. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.08.005
  129. Derrett S, Davie G, Ameratunga S, et al. Capturing outcomes following injury: a New Zealand pilot study. N Z Med J. 2010;123:66–74.
  130. 10.1136/ip.2010.029215.185 · doi:10.1136/ip.2010.029215.185
  131. 10.1080/09638280600926587 · doi:10.1080/09638280600926587
  132. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-949 · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-949
  133. Baron M, Panopalis P, Caron J, et al. McGill Early Arthritis Research Group (McGill). Preliminary Study of the Validity of the World Health Organization Disease [sic.] Assessment Schedule (WHODAS II) in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;32:1403.
  134. 10.1093/mmy/myu037 · doi:10.1093/mmy/myu037
  135. 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.296 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.296
  136. 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51 · DOI · Paper page
  137. Goyal U, Kulkarni KS. Efficacy of Menosan, a polyherbal formulation in the management of menopausal syndrome with respect to quality of life. Indian J Clin Pract. 2002;13:37–40.
  138. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04126.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04126.x
  139. 10.1177/0269215510380829 · doi:10.1177/0269215510380829
  140. 10.2340/16501977-0584 · doi:10.2340/16501977-0584
  141. 10.1310/sci1504-49 · doi:10.1310/sci1504-49
  142. 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.6 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.10.6
  143. 10.1007/s00296-014-3044-9 · doi:10.1007/s00296-014-3044-9
  144. 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328347be15 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0b013e328347be15
  145. 10.1080/07347320802586684 · doi:10.1080/07347320802586684
  146. 10.1055/s-2008-1057763 · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1057763
  147. 10.5455/bcp.20140701074403 · doi:10.5455/bcp.20140701074403
  148. Langley J, Lilley R, Samaranayaka A, et al. Work status and disability trajectories over 12 months after injury among workers in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2014;127:53–60.
  149. 10.1111/1753-6405.12228 · doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12228
  150. 10.1176/appi.ps.61.6.589 · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.61.6.589 · Paper page
  151. 10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903 · doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1023903
  152. Doğanay Erdoğan B, Elhan AH, Kaskatı OT, et al. Integrating patient reported outcome measures and computerized adaptive test estimates on the same common metric: an example from the assessment of activities in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015.
  153. Pösl M. Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO DAS II) – German Version. Disability in patients with musculoskeletal diseases, cardiovascular and general internal diseases, stroke, breast cancer and depressive disorder. München, DE: Universität München; 2004.
  154. Ghaneh B, Saeed-Banadaky SH, Rahaei Z, et al. Disability and self-care among elders in Yazd. Elderly Health J. 2016;2:39–44.

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Federici, S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F., & Luciano, J. V.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-11-07
Volume
39
Issue
23
Pages
2347-2380
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
DOI
10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177
OpenAlex
W2551208370
Cited by
498
References
696
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
The last listed author (J. V. L.) has a “Miguel Servet” research contract from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CP14/00087)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177
The paper
Federici, S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F., & Luciano, J. V. (2017). World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.