The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long‐term female cancer survivors
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To understand the influence of cancer‐related infertility on women's long‐term distress and quality of life. Women diagnosed at age 40 or less with invasive cervical cancer, breast cancer, Hodgkin disease, or non‐Hodgkin lymphoma were interviewed an average of 10 years later. We predicted that women whose desire for a child at diagnosis remained unfulfilled would be significantly more distressed. Methods: Participants completed a semi‐structured phone interview, including the SF‐12®, Brief Symptom Inventory‐18, Impact of Events Scale (IES), Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS), brief measures of marital satisfaction or comfort with dating, sexual satisfaction, and menopause symptoms. Results: Of 455 women contacted by phone, 240 (53%) participated. Seventy‐seven women had wanted a child at diagnosis but did not conceive subsequently (38 remaining childless and 39 with secondary infertility). Even controlling for other psychosocial and health factors, this group had higher distress about infertility (RCS) (p<0.001), had more intrusive thoughts about infertility, and used more avoidance strategies when reminded of infertility (IES) (p<0.001). Childless women were the most distressed. Women with adopted or stepchildren were intermediate, and those with at least one biological child were least distressed. Infertility‐related distress did not differ significantly by cancer site. Conclusions: Even at long‐term follow‐up, distress about interrupted childbearing persists, particularly in childless women. Social parenthood buffers distress somewhat, but not completely. Not only is it important to offer fertility preservation before cancer treatment, but interventions should be developed for survivors to alleviate unresolved grief about cancer‐related infertility. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Online psychoeducational support for infertile women: a randomized controlled trial
Cousineau, T. M., Green, T. C., Corsini, E., Seibring, A., Showstack, M. T., Applegarth, L., Davidson, M., & Perloe, M. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem306 · Cited by 127
Schwerdtfeger, K. L., & Shreffler, K. M. (2009) · Journal of Loss and Trauma · doi:10.1080/15325020802537468 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Canada, A. L., & Schover, L. R.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-143
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2089838428
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.