Cited by 98Cancer survivorship and careSexual function and dysfunction studiesWomen's cancer prevention and management

Quality of life and sexual functioning in young women with early-stage breast cancer 1 year after lumpectomy

Safarinejad, Mohammad Reza, Shafiei, Nayyer, Safarinejad, Shiva·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The breast cancer (BC) and its treatment (mastectomy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) have considerable psychosexual impacts on women's life. This study evaluated sexual functioning, quality of life, and self-esteem in young women with early-stage BC. METHODS: A total of 186 women with stage I or II BC and 204 age-matched controls aged 25-45 years were recruited. To be eligible, patients had to be disease-free and sexually active. They also had to have undergone lumpectomy at least 1 year previously and have completed chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Subjects completed Female Sexual Function Index, Short Form-36 Health Survey, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem questionnaire. Serum sex hormones were also measured in all subjects. RESULTS: Of BC patients, 57% experienced lubrication disorder followed by satisfaction disorder in 53.8%, desire disorder in 42.5%, and arousal disorder in 37.0% (all patients vs. healthy controls <0.01). Hormone-treated patients were more likely to report sexual dysfunctions (p = 0.006). The radiotherapy + chemotherapy + hormone therapy was associated with an about sixfold increased risk of lubrication and satisfaction disorders (adjusted odds ratios = 6.4, 95%CI = 4.6-12.6, and adjusted odds ratios = 5.7, 95%CI = 3.4-11.4, respectively). Cancer patients had lower scores for all components of the Short Form-36 Health Survey, except for pain. Levels of self-esteem did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Young lumpectomized BC women reported a marked impairment in sexual functioning and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3130

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Safarinejad, M. R., Shafiei, N., & Safarinejad, S.
Affiliations
Clinical Centre for Urological and Gynecological Disease Diagnosis and Private Clinic Specialized in Urological and Andrological Genetics Tehran Iran
Corresponding author
Safarinejad, Mohammad Reza
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-09
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
1242-1248
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1519649748
Cited by
98
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, sexual dysfunction, quality of life, young women, breast-conserving surgery, sexual self-esteem, sexual desire, hormone therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, sex hormones, Female Sexual Function Index
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Iran, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Socioeconomic Factors, Mastectomy, Segmental, Prevalence, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review