Cited by 23Cancer survivorship and carePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Psychodynamic interventions in cancer care II: a qualitative analysis of the therapists' reports: Focus of psychodynamic-oriented interventions in cancer patients

Krenz, Sonia, Godel, Cindy, Stagno, Daniele, Stiefel, Frederic, Ludwig, Gundula·2014·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Background To investigate the focus of psychodynamic-oriented interventions in cancer patients by means of a qualitative analysis of the therapists' reports. Methods One hundred thirty-five reports collected within a controlled psychotherapy trial were analyzed; the themes addressed during the intervention were classified in categories reflecting the focus of the intervention and correlated with sociodemographic and medical data and type of intervention. Results Twenty main themes were identified and classified in two categories: category 1 corresponded to interventions based on expression and support, and category 2 to interventions based on introspection, with subcategory 2.1 focusing on the patient's psychological functioning and subcategory 2.2 focusing on his way to engage and communicate in relationships. While the most frequently addressed theme was related to the diagnosis of cancer (N = 102/576; 22.6%), the majority of themes were related to other concerns (N = 446/576; 77.4%). Half of the interventions (50.4%) were classified in category 1, 27.4% in category 2.1, and 9.6% in category 2.2. Patients of category 1 entered less often brief psychotherapy (step 2 of the intervention) and more frequently suffered from advances disease. Conclusions A wide variety of themes are addressed in psychodynamic interventions in the oncology setting, illustrating that cancer is not the only focus of therapy. Other themes reflect different psychological difficulties triggered by the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3373

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different psychological interventions with cancer patients emphasise the importance of a unique and safe relationship of the client with someone who genuinely cares and sees, understands and accepts their experience.

    “This is emphasised by different psychological interventions with cancer patients (Boulton et al.,2001; Carlson,2015; Krenz et al.,2014; MacCormack et al.,2001).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krenz, S., Godel, C., Stagno, D., Stiefel, F., & Ludwig, G.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Krenz, Sonia
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-23
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
75-80
ISSN
1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1558313284
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
psychodynamic psychotherapy, cancer patients, psychological functioning, interpersonal relationships, brief psychotherapy, advanced disease, patient needs
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review