Personal experiences and processes in an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group for stroke survivors: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Rationale: The literature review examined the importance of group-based interventions as a vehicle for the process of change in acquired and traumatic brain injury populations. However, the existing literature lacks consistency and is limited in stroke populations with only one quantitative ACT group-based study evaluating effectiveness for post-stroke difficulties, with no qualitative research in this area. Research question: This thesis aims to address the existing gap by exploring stroke survivors’ experiences of interacting with each other in the ACT-based group. The current study aims to gain insight into individual perceptions on whether or not stroke survivors find it beneficial to be in the presence of other stroke survivors and how group processes and the ACT tools may support or hinder their recovery. Aims: This study aims to add to the scarce research dedicated to the stroke population, and to inform the clinical practice of Counselling Psychologists and other professionals when working with stroke populations. Method: Data gathered from eight semi-structured interviews was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Findings: The collected data generated four master themes: “It is just so difficult”; Means to a connection; Restoring confidence and hope; and “Things won’t be the same”: moving towards acceptance. The master themes aim to encapsulate the participants’ views on what they found meaningful or challenging about being in the ACT group setting with other stroke survivors. The findings indicate the role of the group process to be of great value in measuring recovery progress and restoring self-esteem and self-agency. Furthermore, participants experienced apprehension at the start, throughout, and at the end of the group but this also formed part of the process of acceptance. The benefits of ACT tools in adjusting were reflected on, alongside the challenges in comprehending them. The findings of the current study are discussed in the context of group theory and research,and a suggestion for clinical practice is outlined, such as a need for homogeneous group structure, inclusion of significant others or time factors. The relevance to Counselling Psychology is outlined, followed by the strengths and limitations of the current study, and recommendations for further research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Literature exploring the outcome of ACT in stroke survivors has highlighted learning from each other as playing a pivotal role in increasing confidence, awareness, self-esteem, and alignment to values while asking for help.
“literature exploring the outcome of ACT in stroke survivors has highlighted learning from each other as playing a pivotal role in increasing confidence, awareness, self-esteem, and alignment to values while asking for help (Starling, 2019).”
From “It’s knowing that there are other people and they’ve accepted it”: Patients’ experiences of an acceptance and commitment therapy group intervention for people with neurological conditions (2025) · cites this paper as Starling, 2019
Cites
Krenz, S., Godel, C., Stagno, D., Stiefel, F., & Ludwig, G. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3373 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Storey, A., Nash, E., Dempsey, H., McIvor, K., & Zarotti, N. (2025) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2025.2457666 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Starling, M.
- Affiliations
- Psychology
- Corresponding author
- Starling, Maya
- Venue
- University of East London
- Publisher
- University of East London
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W2992375764
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UEL Research Repository (University of East London)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, stroke survivors, group therapy, group process, lived experience, acceptance, self-esteem, self-agency, stroke recovery, peer support, counselling psychology practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review