Family caregivers' distress levels related to quality of life, burden, and preparedness: Family caregiver distress in NSCLC
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Family caregivers (FCGs) caring for loved ones with lung cancer are at risk for psychological distress and impaired quality of life (QOL). This study explores the relationship between FCGs' distress, per the distress thermometer (DT) and FCGs' QOL, burden, and preparedness. The purpose is to identify types of problems unique to FCGs in cancer care. METHODS: Family caregivers of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer were recruited from an adult outpatient setting at a comprehensive cancer center. Questionnaires included demographic information, City of Hope QOL Scale-Family Version, Caregiver Burden Scale, FCG preparedness, and DT. Baseline data were utilized for this analysis. RESULTS: Of the FCGs (N = 163), 68% were spouses, 64% female, and 34% worked full-time. FCG age ranged from 21 to 88 years with a mean of 57 years. FCGs cared for patients with non-small cell lung cancer stage I-III (44%) and stage IV (56%). Psychological distress (DT mean = 4.40) was moderate. DT scores were highly correlated with seven of the eight explanatory variables. Secondary principal components analysis of the explanatory variables combined correlated variables into three constructs identified as self-care component, FCG role component, and FCG stress component. Simultaneous multiple regression of distress onto the three components showed they accounted for 49% of the variance in distress. CONCLUSION: This exploration of FCGs' concerns associated with elevated distress scores, as measured by the DT, helped identify three component problem areas. These areas warrant further psychosocial assessment and intervention to support FCGs as they care for the patient with cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers of patients with LC report receiving minimal psychosocial care.
“Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
From Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The Introduction recommends screening caregivers’ psychosocial needs, and the Discussion calls for assessment and support when distress is identified. Neither section reports whether caregivers of patients with lung cancer received psychosocial care or describes that care as minimal. Searches for psychosocial care, service use, and support received found no such report; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious research by the authors suggests that lung cancer family caregivers experience significant psychological distress, higher caregiver burden, and decreased QOL related to caregiving.
“Our previous research suggests that lung cancer family caregivers experience significant psychological distress, higher caregiver burden, and decreased QOL related to their caregiving role.8–11”
From A Multimedia Self-management Intervention to Prepare Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers for Lung Surgery and Postoperative Recovery (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [5]Adler NE Page AEK Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2008 Washington, D.C National Academies Press 20669419
- Authors
- Fujinami, R., Sun, V., Zachariah, F., Uman, G., Grant, M., & Ferrell, B.
- Affiliations
- City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
- Vital Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fujinami, Rebecca
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-62
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4216636
- OpenAlex
- W2133801173
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (5 PO1 CA 136396-02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- family caregivers, psychological distress, non-small cell lung cancer, caregiver burden, caregiver preparedness, quality of life, caregiver self-care, caregiver stress, caregiver role, psychosocial support
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review