Cited by 5Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

Open access
Rangel, Maria L., Milbury, Kathrin, Kayser, Karen, Ripley, Robert Taylor, Kvale, Elizabeth, Badr, Hoda·2024·JTO Clinical and Research Reports

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) face significant physical, psychological, and functional challenges, increasing their reliance on caregivers for practical and emotional support. This study evaluates the efficacy of CareSTEPS (Self-Care, Stress management, Symptom management, Effective communication, Problem-solving, and Social support), a 6-week telephone-delivered intervention designed to improve psychological functioning (depression and anxiety symptoms) and reduce caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced LC. Methods: In this multisite, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 174 caregivers (74.1% female individuals, 40.2% from a racial or ethnic minority group) of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC or extensive-stage SCLC completed baseline surveys and were randomly assigned to CareSTEPS (n = 87) or usual care (n = 87) using stratified block randomization. Caregivers in the CareSTEPS arm received a manual with information on self-care, stress management, symptom management, effective communication, problem-solving, and social support. They also participated in six weekly telephone sessions with Masters-level trained interventionists with a mental health background, who provided psychoeducation, skills training, and support. Eight weeks after baseline, caregivers completed a follow-up survey. Results: values lower than 0.05 indicating significant differences. Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = -0.55, anxiety d = -0.81, burden d = -0.37). Conclusions: The CareSTEPS intervention reports great promise in meeting the critical support needs of the family caregivers of patients with advanced LC, significantly improving caregivers' psychological functioning and reducing their burden. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of incorporating caregiver support into the comprehensive management of advanced LC. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02414672.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

CareSTEPS, a 6-week telephone-delivered psychoeducational intervention for family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer, improved caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden relative to usual care in a multisite randomized trial. Effects were significant at 8-week follow-up, with medium-to-large improvements in anxiety and depression and a small-to-medium reduction in burden.

Key findings

  • Among 174 randomized caregivers, CareSTEPS produced significantly lower depression symptoms than usual care at follow-up (p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = −0.55; observed power = 0.91).
  • CareSTEPS produced significantly lower anxiety symptoms than usual care at follow-up (p < 0.0001; d = −0.81; observed power = 0.99).
  • Caregiver burden was also significantly lower in the CareSTEPS group (p < 0.0001; d = −0.37; observed power = 0.91); the Results text labels this comparison “At T1,” although baseline tables report no significant group differences.
  • Clinical-significance analyses showed greater improvement among baseline cases: depression 83.3% improved in CareSTEPS vs 40% in usual care (p = 0.047); anxiety 82.1% vs 34.4% (p < 0.001); high burden 56% vs 5.6% (p < 0.001).

Methods

  • Multisite, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted 2015–2021 across four comprehensive cancer centers; 174 caregivers of patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC or extensive-stage SCLC were randomized 1:1 to CareSTEPS (n = 87) or usual care (n = 87), stratified by histologic type, disease stage, and patient-caregiver relationship.
  • CareSTEPS consisted of a manual plus six weekly 60-minute telephone sessions delivered by Masters-level mental health-trained interventionists, covering self-care, stress management, symptom management, effective communication, problem-solving, and social support; follow-up was 8 weeks after baseline.
  • Primary outcomes were PROMIS depression and anxiety short forms; secondary outcome was the 12-item Zarit Burden Interview. Efficacy was tested with intent-to-treat ANCOVA using baseline scores as covariates, multiple imputation for missing data, two-sided p < 0.05, and Cohen’s d effect sizes.

Limitations

  • The paper states limitations including lack of extended follow-up, predominance of female caregivers, limited racial/ethnic minority inclusion, and English-only delivery; it also notes that usual care rather than an attention control was used, so nonspecific effects cannot be ruled out.
  • Evident from the text: the trial was open-label with self-reported outcomes, follow-up completion was 71% in CareSTEPS and 64% in usual care, average telephone session attendance was 67%, and caregivers completed an average of 2.5 homework assignments (range 0–5).
  • The caregiver-burden Results sentence says “At T1” for a significant between-group difference, which conflicts with the baseline table showing no significant group differences; this appears to be a reporting inconsistency in the paper.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100736

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

14 of 28 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Caregivers of patients with LC report receiving minimal psychosocial care.

    “Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] Kedia, 2020, Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: a systematic review, Psychooncology source
    • cites [16] Fujinami, 2015, Family caregivers’ distress levels related to quality of life, burden, and preparedness, Psychooncology source

      The Introduction recommends screening caregivers’ psychosocial needs, and the Discussion calls for assessment and support when distress is identified. Neither section reports whether caregivers of patients with lung cancer received psychosocial care or describes that care as minimal. Searches for psychosocial care, service use, and support received found no such report; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [17] Lee, 2018, Trajectories of caregiver burden and related factors in family caregivers of patients with lung cancer, Psychooncology source
  • Premisecitation

    Patients receiving treatment for advanced LC frequently report significant symptom burdens, such as diminished physical functioning, shortness of breath, and pain.

    “Patients receiving treatment for advanced LC frequently report significant symptom burdens, such as diminished physical functioning, shortness of breath, and pain.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Cooley, 2000, Symptoms in adults with lung cancer. A systematic research review, J Pain Symptom Manage source

      The “Symptoms in Lung Cancer” section reports a high prevalence of uncontrolled symptoms in advanced lung cancer, with pain and dyspnea among the most common and intense. The review also describes symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (“Sample”), but it does not establish diminished physical functioning as a frequently reported symptom in that treatment group; “Methodological Issues” treats functional status as distinct from physical symptoms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The discrepancy between the philosophical emphasis on family support and the actual support received by caregivers stems from systemic issues like inadequate caregiver training, limited support services, and poor integration of informal caregiving into the patient care plan.

    “This discrepancy between the philosophical emphasis on family support and the actual support received by caregivers stems from systemic issues like inadequate caregiver training, limited support services, and poor integration of informal caregiving into the patient care plan.20”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Chua, 2020, Supporting the patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: what are their palliative care needs?, BMC Cancer source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Interventions specifically addressing the needs of advanced LC caregivers in the outpatient setting remain limited.

    “While numerous interventions have been tested for cancer caregivers, interventions specifically addressing the needs of advanced LC caregivers in the outpatient setting remain limited.21”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Chow, 2023, Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
  • Premisecitation

    Caregivers of patients with LC report significant emotional distress.

    “Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [13] Carmack Taylor, 2008, Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation, Ann Behav Med source
    • cites [14] Degner, 1995, Symptom distress in newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients and as a predictor of survival in lung cancer, J Pain Symptom Manag source

      The patient-results passage (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports symptom distress among cancer patients, including those with lung cancer, not emotional distress among their caregivers. A later discussion passage mentions family issues but does not report caregivers’ distress. Searches for caregiver emotional distress and family-member distress found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [15] Zabora, 2001, The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site, Psychooncology source
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Caregiver burden and poor mental health can adversely affect the caregiver's ability to provide quality care to the patient.

    “This contributes to caregiver burden18 and poor mental health,19 which can adversely affect the caregiver’s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] Wood, 2019, The humanistic burden of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Europe: a real-world survey linking patient clinical factors to patient and caregiver burden, Qual Life Res source

      The Results (Humanistic burden on caregivers; page unavailable) report greater caregiver burden, activity impairment, and risk of depression as patients’ functional status declines. The paper does not assess whether caregiver burden or poor mental health reduces the quality of care provided to patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [19] Cochrane, 2021, Variables associated with distress amongst informal caregivers of people with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature, Psychooncology source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    T-scores of 60 or more on PROMIS indicate moderate depression/anxiety in need for further psychological evaluation.

    “T-scores of 60 or more indicate moderate depression/anxiety in need for further psychological evaluation.31, 32, 33”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [32] Kroenke, 2020, Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials, J Affect Disord source

      The Results section (page not available in our copy) identifies a PROMIS depression T-score of 60 as an approximate threshold for moderate depression, with 65 and 70 marking higher severity levels. The paper does not establish the same threshold for anxiety or say that a score of 60 or more requires further psychological evaluation; it discusses cut-points as aids to treatment decisions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [33] Cheng, 2023, Interpretation of PROMIS depression and anxiety measures compared with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria in musculoskeletal patients, JB JS Open Access source

      The Outcome Measures section says a PROMIS Depression or Anxiety score of 60 is unfavorable, and the Conclusions recommend using the measures to identify patients who may benefit from further mental health evaluation. But the paper does not define ≥60 as the threshold for moderate depression or anxiety or say that everyone at that score needs evaluation; its optimal screening cutoffs in these musculoskeletal patients were ≥53 for depression and ≥59 for anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared and lacking caregiving resources.

    “Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Murray, 2002, Dying of lung cancer or cardiac failure: prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers in the community, Br Med J source

      In “Living with illness” (page not specified), a lung-cancer carer worries about not knowing what to do when death occurs, supporting the feeling of being unprepared. “Service provision” (page not specified) says carer support and other services were usually available, though misunderstandings sometimes prevented access. It does not establish that lung-cancer caregivers generally lacked caregiving resources. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Bakas, 2001, Caregiving tasks among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer, Oncol Nurs Forum
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The effect sizes for CareSTEPS are comparable to and exceed those reported in the broader literature on cancer caregivers.

    “These effect sizes are comparable to and exceed those reported in the broader literature on cancer caregivers,21,40”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [21] Chow, 2023, Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
    • cites [40] Cheng, 2022, Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions among caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Nurs Stud source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    If the goal of a trial is to see if an intervention is superior to existing practices, it must be compared with them.

    “if the goal of a trial is to see if an intervention is superior to existing practices (in this case, UC), it must be compared with them.43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Freedland, 2011, Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions, Psychosom Med source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    CareSTEPS reduced caregiver burden compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.37.

    “Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    412 patients were screened; 78 were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria, primarily owing to lack of a caregiver or inability to contact the caregiver.

    “The CONSORT diagram (Fig. 1) shows that 412 patients were screened. Seventy-eight were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, primarily owing to the lack of a caregiver or the research team’s inability to contact the caregiver to determine interest and eligibility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In most cases, missed sessions were caused by conflicting demands or poor patient health.

    “In most cases, missed sessions were caused by conflicting demands or poor patient health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    CareSTEPS reduced anxiety symptoms compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.81.

    “Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Refusals were primarily owing to a lack of caregiver interest or availability.

    “Refusals were primarily owing to a lack of caregiver interest or availability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Employed caregivers reported greater depression than those who were not employed.

    “employed caregivers reported greater depression (M = 12.77, SD = 4.65) than those who were not employed (M = 11.35, SD = 4.46) (t = 1.97, p = 0.05)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-off for the PROMIS anxiety measure at baseline.

    “27 (15.5%) and 60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-offs for the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures, respectively”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    27 (15.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-off for the PROMIS depression measure at baseline.

    “27 (15.5%) and 60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-offs for the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures, respectively”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Spouses/partners reported greater caregiver burden than sons/daughters and other family members.

    “spouses/partners (M = 15.69, SD = 8.40) reported greater caregiver burden than sons/daughters (M = 14.71, SD = 9.28) and other family members (M = 11.44, SD = 8.00) (F = 2.97, p = 0.05)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Of 334 eligible caregivers, 187 (56%) consented.

    “Of the 334 eligible caregivers, 187 (56%) consented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In most cases, lack of follow-up completion was caused by the patient entering hospice/dying (n = 15 of 34; 44%), the caregiver being too busy (n = 10; 29%), or the patient's poor health/death.

    “In most cases, the lack of follow-up completion was caused by the patient entering hospice/dying (n = 15 of 34; 44%), the caregiver being too busy (n = 10; 29%), or the patient’s poor health/death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    CareSTEPS reduced depression symptoms compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.55.

    “Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Caregivers who lived with the patient reported greater caregiver burden than those who did not live with the patient.

    “caregivers who lived with the patient reported greater caregiver burden (M = 15.69, SD = 8.60) than those who did not live with the patient (M = 11.78, SD = 8.28; t = 2.67, p = 0.01)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study had 67% attendance and 50% homework completion rates.

    “Despite positive evaluations, the 67% attendance and 50% homework completion rates reveal that caregivers struggled to consistently participate in the multisession intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some caregivers suggested choosing modules that addressed their caregiving challenges rather than completing the program to improve relevance and effectiveness.

    “Others suggested choosing modules that addressed their caregiving challenges rather than completing the program to improve relevance and effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size for the depression difference was Cohen's d = -0.55, a medium effect.

    “The effect size for this difference (Cohen’s d) was −0.55, which is a medium effect,39 with an observed power of 0.91.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Cohen, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For caregivers meeting PROMIS depression criteria at baseline (N = 27), 40% in UC improved versus 83.3% in CareSTEPS, a significant difference (p = 0.047).

    “For caregivers meeting PROMIS depression criteria at baseline (N = 27), six of the 15 (40%) in UC improved versus 10 of the 12 (83.3%) in CareSTEPS, showing a significant difference (p = 0.047, Fisher’s exact test).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size for the caregiver burden difference was -0.37, a small to medium effect.

    “The effect size was −0.37, which was a small to medium effect with an observed power of 0.91.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The effect size for the anxiety difference was d = -0.81, a large effect.

    “The effect size (d) was −0.81, which is a large effect, with an observed power of 0.99.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most caregivers enjoyed their participation, but some wanted more personalized sessions.

    “Most caregivers enjoyed their participation, but some wanted more personalized sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants liked the program's convenience, usefulness, and relevance and praised the interventionists.

    “Table 4 reports that participants liked the program's convenience, usefulness, and relevance and praised the interventionists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    No statistically significant gender-based differences in distress were discovered.

    “though no statistically significant gender-based differences in distress were discovered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trial was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02414672).

    “This multisite, open-label, individually randomized trial, approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02414672) was conducted between 2015 and 2021.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Data analysts were blinded to group assignments.

    “Nevertheless, to maintain the integrity of the study results, the data analysts were blinded to group assignments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Model covariates were selected based on their association with study outcomes: continuous variables if significant at p < 0.05, categorical if mean differences significant at p < 0.05.

    “Model covariates were selected on the basis of their association with the study outcomes. Continuous variables were included as covariates if they reported a significant association with the outcomes at a p value lower than 0.05. Similarly, categorical variables were incorporated as covariates when M differences in the outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for caregiver burden was 0.90 at T1 and 0.91 at T2.

    “Cronbach’s α scores, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Randomization was stratified by histologic type, disease stage, and type of patient-caregiver relationship using a computer-generated schedule with random block sizes of two and four, maintaining a 1:1 allocation ratio within each stratum.

    “Randomization was stratified by histologic type (NSCLC versus SCLC), disease stage (IIIB versus IV or advanced), and type of patient-caregiver relationship (spouse or partner versus other family members) using a computer-generated schedule with random block sizes of two and four, maintaining a 1:1 allocation ratio within each stratum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.

    “Likewise, most educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.22,23”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Bucher, 2001, Problem-solving cancer care education for patients and caregivers, Cancer Pract source
    • cites [23] Thomas, 2015, The development and evaluation of a multimedia resource for family carers of patients receiving palliative care: a consumer-led project, Palliat Support Care source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Thirteen consenting caregivers dropped out before returning to the baseline survey (passive refusal), leaving 174 who were randomized.

    “Thirteen consenting caregivers dropped out before returning to the baseline survey (passive refusal), leaving 174 who were randomized (87 to CareSTEPS, 87 to UC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for anxiety was 0.89 at T1 and 0.90 at T2.

    “In this study, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α) scores for depression, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively and the scores for anxiety, αT1 and αT2, were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    On average, caregivers completed 2.5 homework assignments (range 0-5).

    “On average, caregivers completed 2.5 homework assignments (range 0–5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Self-Determination Theory holds that meeting people's needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness is critical for psychological health and well-being.

    “The program is grounded by Self-Determination Theory,29 which holds that meeting people’s needs for competence (self-efficacy), autonomy (choice and volition), and relatedness (belonging and connection) is critical for psychological health and well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Deci, 2000, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychol Inq source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Analyses of covariance were conducted with T1 scores as model covariates and T2 scores as outcomes.

    “Analyses of covariance were conducted to assess the efficacy of CareSTEPS, with T1 scores as model covariates and T2 scores as outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Analyses used an intent-to-treat framework.

    “An intent-to-treat framework was implemented, and a two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for depression was 0.90 at T1 and 0.91 at T2.

    “In this study, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α) scores for depression, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively and the scores for anxiety, αT1 and αT2, were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Fidelity was assessed by rating a random subset of 25% of digitally recorded sessions by two trained coders using a fidelity checklist.

    “For each interventionist, a random subset of 25% of digitally recorded sessions were rated for fidelity by two trained coders. The fidelity checklist assessed whether session topics were covered and whether in-session exercises and homework were completed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Sample size recalculation was conducted after 100 caregivers had been randomized (50 per arm) using actual attrition rates rather than pretrial estimates and without examining treatment effects.

    “A sample size recalculation was conducted after 100 caregivers had been randomized (50 in each arm) using actual attrition rates rather than pretrial estimates and without examining treatment effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methods.

    “Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    The most important factor in selecting a control condition is how well it fits the purpose of the trial.

    “Because the most important factor in selecting a control condition is how well it fits the purpose of the trial,44”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Wampold, 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The observed power for the caregiver burden difference was 0.91.

    “The effect size was −0.37, which was a small to medium effect with an observed power of 0.91.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The observed improvements may have been due to nonspecific effects because CareSTEPS was compared to usual care rather than an attention control condition.

    “Given that we compared CareSTEPS to UC rather than an attention control condition, it is possible that the observed improvements were due to nonspecific effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Table 3 reports estimated marginal means for the primary and secondary outcomes, controlling for caregiver employment status, type of patient-caregiver relationship, and whether or not the caregiver lived with the patient.

    “Table 3 reports the estimated marginal Ms for the primary and secondary outcomes, controlling for caregiver employment status, type of patient-caregiver relationship, and whether or not the caregiver lived with the patient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Burden difference is described as significant at baseline

    Minor

    The caregiver-burden result claims a significant between-group difference at T1, but the paper explicitly says there were no significant baseline differences by study arm. The reported treatment conclusion concerns follow-up rather than a baseline difference.

  • Extensive-stage SCLC counts do not sum to the reported total

    Minor

    Table 1 gives a full-sample count of 12 for extensive-stage SCLC, while the two study-arm counts sum to 32.

    Reported 12 · recomputed 32

  • Stage IIIB NSCLC counts do not sum to the reported total

    Minor

    Table 1 gives a full-sample count of 32 for stage IIIB NSCLC, but lists only six caregivers in each arm.

    Reported 32 · recomputed 12

  • Depression and anxiety cutoff excludes a score of 60 later in the paper

    Minor

    The measures section includes a T-score of 60 in the moderate depression/anxiety threshold, whereas the clinical-significance analysis defines high scores as strictly greater than 60.

  • Non-cohabiting caregivers do not sum to the reported total

    Minor

    Table 1 reports 46 caregivers not living with the patient, but its study-arm counts sum to 128. The totals appear reversed between the Yes and No rows.

    Reported 46 · recomputed 128

  • Moderate-burden cutoff excludes a score of 11 later in the paper

    Minor

    The measures section classifies a burden score of 11 as moderate, but the clinical-significance definition of moderate to high burden requires a score greater than 11.

  • Cohabiting caregivers do not sum to the reported total

    Minor

    Table 1 reports 128 caregivers living with the patient, but its two study-arm counts sum to 46.

    Reported 128 · recomputed 46

7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rangel, M. L., Milbury, K., Kayser, K., Ripley, R. T., Kvale, E., & Badr, H.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Corresponding author
Badr, Hoda
Venue
JTO Clinical and Research Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
100736
ISSN
2666-3643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403509041
Cited by
5
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JTO Clinical and Research Reports (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA187143)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
family caregivers, advanced lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, telephone-delivered intervention, psychoeducation, stress management, symptom management, social support, caregiver support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review