Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) face significant physical, psychological, and functional challenges, increasing their reliance on caregivers for practical and emotional support. This study evaluates the efficacy of CareSTEPS (Self-Care, Stress management, Symptom management, Effective communication, Problem-solving, and Social support), a 6-week telephone-delivered intervention designed to improve psychological functioning (depression and anxiety symptoms) and reduce caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced LC. Methods: In this multisite, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 174 caregivers (74.1% female individuals, 40.2% from a racial or ethnic minority group) of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC or extensive-stage SCLC completed baseline surveys and were randomly assigned to CareSTEPS (n = 87) or usual care (n = 87) using stratified block randomization. Caregivers in the CareSTEPS arm received a manual with information on self-care, stress management, symptom management, effective communication, problem-solving, and social support. They also participated in six weekly telephone sessions with Masters-level trained interventionists with a mental health background, who provided psychoeducation, skills training, and support. Eight weeks after baseline, caregivers completed a follow-up survey. Results: values lower than 0.05 indicating significant differences. Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = -0.55, anxiety d = -0.81, burden d = -0.37). Conclusions: The CareSTEPS intervention reports great promise in meeting the critical support needs of the family caregivers of patients with advanced LC, significantly improving caregivers' psychological functioning and reducing their burden. Overall, the findings emphasize the importance of incorporating caregiver support into the comprehensive management of advanced LC. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02414672.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
CareSTEPS, a 6-week telephone-delivered psychoeducational intervention for family caregivers of patients with advanced lung cancer, improved caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden relative to usual care in a multisite randomized trial. Effects were significant at 8-week follow-up, with medium-to-large improvements in anxiety and depression and a small-to-medium reduction in burden.
Key findings
- Among 174 randomized caregivers, CareSTEPS produced significantly lower depression symptoms than usual care at follow-up (p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = −0.55; observed power = 0.91).
- CareSTEPS produced significantly lower anxiety symptoms than usual care at follow-up (p < 0.0001; d = −0.81; observed power = 0.99).
- Caregiver burden was also significantly lower in the CareSTEPS group (p < 0.0001; d = −0.37; observed power = 0.91); the Results text labels this comparison “At T1,” although baseline tables report no significant group differences.
- Clinical-significance analyses showed greater improvement among baseline cases: depression 83.3% improved in CareSTEPS vs 40% in usual care (p = 0.047); anxiety 82.1% vs 34.4% (p < 0.001); high burden 56% vs 5.6% (p < 0.001).
Methods
- Multisite, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted 2015–2021 across four comprehensive cancer centers; 174 caregivers of patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC or extensive-stage SCLC were randomized 1:1 to CareSTEPS (n = 87) or usual care (n = 87), stratified by histologic type, disease stage, and patient-caregiver relationship.
- CareSTEPS consisted of a manual plus six weekly 60-minute telephone sessions delivered by Masters-level mental health-trained interventionists, covering self-care, stress management, symptom management, effective communication, problem-solving, and social support; follow-up was 8 weeks after baseline.
- Primary outcomes were PROMIS depression and anxiety short forms; secondary outcome was the 12-item Zarit Burden Interview. Efficacy was tested with intent-to-treat ANCOVA using baseline scores as covariates, multiple imputation for missing data, two-sided p < 0.05, and Cohen’s d effect sizes.
Limitations
- The paper states limitations including lack of extended follow-up, predominance of female caregivers, limited racial/ethnic minority inclusion, and English-only delivery; it also notes that usual care rather than an attention control was used, so nonspecific effects cannot be ruled out.
- Evident from the text: the trial was open-label with self-reported outcomes, follow-up completion was 71% in CareSTEPS and 64% in usual care, average telephone session attendance was 67%, and caregivers completed an average of 2.5 homework assignments (range 0–5).
- The caregiver-burden Results sentence says “At T1” for a significant between-group difference, which conflicts with the baseline table showing no significant group differences; this appears to be a reporting inconsistency in the paper.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
14 of 28 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Caregivers of patients with LC report receiving minimal psychosocial care.
“Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Kedia, 2020, Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: a systematic review, Psychooncology source
- cites [16] Fujinami, 2015, Family caregivers’ distress levels related to quality of life, burden, and preparedness, Psychooncology source
The Introduction recommends screening caregivers’ psychosocial needs, and the Discussion calls for assessment and support when distress is identified. Neither section reports whether caregivers of patients with lung cancer received psychosocial care or describes that care as minimal. Searches for psychosocial care, service use, and support received found no such report; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Lee, 2018, Trajectories of caregiver burden and related factors in family caregivers of patients with lung cancer, Psychooncology source
- Premisecitation
Patients receiving treatment for advanced LC frequently report significant symptom burdens, such as diminished physical functioning, shortness of breath, and pain.
“Patients receiving treatment for advanced LC frequently report significant symptom burdens, such as diminished physical functioning, shortness of breath, and pain.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Cooley, 2000, Symptoms in adults with lung cancer. A systematic research review, J Pain Symptom Manage source
The “Symptoms in Lung Cancer” section reports a high prevalence of uncontrolled symptoms in advanced lung cancer, with pain and dyspnea among the most common and intense. The review also describes symptoms in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (“Sample”), but it does not establish diminished physical functioning as a frequently reported symptom in that treatment group; “Methodological Issues” treats functional status as distinct from physical symptoms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The discrepancy between the philosophical emphasis on family support and the actual support received by caregivers stems from systemic issues like inadequate caregiver training, limited support services, and poor integration of informal caregiving into the patient care plan.
“This discrepancy between the philosophical emphasis on family support and the actual support received by caregivers stems from systemic issues like inadequate caregiver training, limited support services, and poor integration of informal caregiving into the patient care plan.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Chua, 2020, Supporting the patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: what are their palliative care needs?, BMC Cancer source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Interventions specifically addressing the needs of advanced LC caregivers in the outpatient setting remain limited.
“While numerous interventions have been tested for cancer caregivers, interventions specifically addressing the needs of advanced LC caregivers in the outpatient setting remain limited.21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Chow, 2023, Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
- Premisecitation
Caregivers of patients with LC report significant emotional distress.
“Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Carmack Taylor, 2008, Lung cancer patients and their spouses: psychological and relationship functioning within 1 month of treatment initiation, Ann Behav Med source
- cites [14] Degner, 1995, Symptom distress in newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients and as a predictor of survival in lung cancer, J Pain Symptom Manag source
The patient-results passage (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports symptom distress among cancer patients, including those with lung cancer, not emotional distress among their caregivers. A later discussion passage mentions family issues but does not report caregivers’ distress. Searches for caregiver emotional distress and family-member distress found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Zabora, 2001, The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site, Psychooncology source
- Study design and conductcitation
The study lacked extended follow-up.
“Limitations included a lack of extended follow-up, which is often complicated in the advanced cancer setting owing to poor patient prognosis and increased caregiving demands.41,42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] Shaw, 2016, Improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of people with poor prognosis gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized controlled trial (Family Connect), Support Care Cancer source
- cites [42] Northouse, 2006, Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention, Res Nurs Health source
The Retention Outcomes and Retention Issues sections report substantially higher attrition among advanced-phase patients, chiefly because of death and illness progression. The paper also discusses demands of illness and treatment as reasons for attrition, but does not specifically establish increased caregiving demands as a cause of difficult follow-up in advanced cancer. The lack of extended follow-up is the citing study’s own stated limitation, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
56% of caregivers consented.
“Many caregivers refused owing to busy schedules, with 56% consenting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For caregivers meeting PROMIS anxiety criteria (N = 60), 34.4% in UC improved versus 82.1% in CareSTEPS (p < 0.001).
“In those meeting PROMIS anxiety criteria (N = 60), improvements were seen in 34.4% (11 out of 32) in UC versus 82.1% (23 of 28) in CareSTEPS (p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At T2 there was a significant difference in depression, with the CareSTEPS group having lower mean scores (less depressive symptomatology) than the UC group.
“At T2 there was a significant difference in depression (p < 0.0001), with the CareSTEPS group having lower M scores (less depressive symptomatology) than the UC group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Limited racial/ethnic minority inclusion was present.
“Limited racial/ethnic minority inclusion, partially owing to English-only delivery suggests future iterations of CareSTEPS may benefit from cultural and linguistic adaptations to appeal to a broader caregiver demographic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Small to large effect sizes were achieved despite suboptimal engagement rates.
“Small to large effect sizes were achieved despite suboptimal engagement rates, demonstrating the effectiveness of the program’s key components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At T1 there was a significant difference in caregiver burden, with the CareSTEPS group having lower mean scores (less caregiver burden) than the UC group.
“At T1 there was a significant difference in caregiver burden (p < 0.0001), with the CareSTEPS group having lower M scores (less caregiver burden) than the UC group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among caregivers with high burden at baseline (N = 43), 5.6% in UC improved compared with 56% in CareSTEPS (p < 0.001).
“Among caregivers with high burden at baseline (N = 43), 5.6% (one of 18) in UC improved compared with 56% (14 of 25) in CareSTEPS (chi-square = 11.72, p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At T2 there was a significant difference in anxiety, with the CareSTEPS group having lower mean scores (less anxiety) than the UC group.
“At T2 there was a significant difference in anxiety (p < 0.0001), with the CareSTEPS group having lower M scores (less anxiety) than the UC group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Telephone session attendance was 67% (four of six sessions) on average.
“Telephone session attendance was 67% (four of six sessions) on average.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Sample size was determined to require a minimum of 87 caregivers per arm (n = 174) at baseline to detect an effect size of 0.46 with a two-tailed test, power 0.80, and alpha 0.05.
“On the basis of this, it was determined that a minimum of 87 caregivers per arm (n = 174) is required at baseline to detect an effect size of 0.46 with a two-tailed test, given a power of 0.80 and an alpha of 0.05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Patients with advanced LC are more likely than patients with other types of cancer to have anxiety and depression symptoms.
“They are also more likely than patients with other types of cancer to have anxiety and depression symptoms.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Brintzenhofe-Szoc, 2009, Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: prevalence by cancer type, Psychosomatics source
- Study design and conductreasoning
Blinding of participants and caregivers was not feasible.
“Owing to the nature of the intervention involving psychoeducational and behavioral components delivered by interventionists, blinding of participants and caregivers was not feasible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.
“Although family support is deeply ingrained in palliative care philosophy,9 real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Alam, 2020, Palliative care for family caregivers, J Clin Oncol source
- Study design and conductown data
Sociodemographic characteristics did not differ significantly between caregiver participants and refusers.
“Sociodemographic characteristics did not differ significantly between caregiver participants and refusers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Table 1 reports no significant differences in sociodemographic/medical characteristics or baseline study variables between groups.
“Table 1 reports no significant differences in sociodemographic/medical characteristics or baseline study variables between groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Chi-square and t tests found no significant differences in baseline demographic, medical, and outcome measures between study completers and non-completers.
“The chi-square and t tests found no significant differences in baseline demographic, medical, and outcome measures between study completers and non-completers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
No significant baseline differences by study arm were found.
“No significant baseline differences by study arm were found.”
- Also stated in: § Participant Characteristics · plain
“Likewise, there were no significant group differences regarding baseline participant characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Participant Characteristics · plain
- Study design and conductown data
The eight-week follow-up was completed by 62 (71%) caregivers in the CareSTEPS arm and 56 (64%) caregivers in the UC arm.
“The eight-week follow-up was completed by 62 (71%) caregivers in the CareSTEPS arm and 56 (64%) caregivers in the UC arm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The observed power for the anxiety difference was 0.99.
“The effect size (d) was −0.81, which is a large effect, with an observed power of 0.99.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The study used standardized, validated measures.
“This study had several strengths, including its caregiver-centric and theory-grounded approach, and methodological rigor achieved through the use of standardized, validated measures and evidence-based strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The predominance of female caregivers may limit generalizability to male caregivers.
“The predominance of female caregivers, which is consistent with broader caregiver demographics, may limit generalizability to male caregivers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Caregivers struggled to consistently participate in the multisession intervention.
“Despite positive evaluations, the 67% attendance and 50% homework completion rates reveal that caregivers struggled to consistently participate in the multisession intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The observed power for the depression difference was 0.91.
“The effect size for this difference (Cohen’s d) was −0.55, which is a medium effect,39 with an observed power of 0.91.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
CareSTEPS interventionists averaged 97% fidelity.
“CareSTEPS interventionists averaged 97% fidelity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
CareSTEPS reduces caregiver burden in advanced lung cancer caregivers relative to usual care.
“This study found that the CareSTEPS intervention reduces depression (d = −0.55), anxiety (d = −0.81), and burden (d = −0.37) in advanced LC caregivers relative to UC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In conclusion, the CareSTEPS intervention significantly reduced caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden, relative to UC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationown data
Caregiver experiences vary by relationship, cohabitation, and employment status.
“This study revealed that caregiver experiences vary by relationship, cohabitation, and employment status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CareSTEPS reduces depression in advanced lung cancer caregivers relative to usual care.
“This study found that the CareSTEPS intervention reduces depression (d = −0.55), anxiety (d = −0.81), and burden (d = −0.37) in advanced LC caregivers relative to UC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“In conclusion, the CareSTEPS intervention significantly reduced caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden, relative to UC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Interpretationown data
CareSTEPS reduces anxiety in advanced lung cancer caregivers relative to usual care.
“This study found that the CareSTEPS intervention reduces depression (d = −0.55), anxiety (d = −0.81), and burden (d = −0.37) in advanced LC caregivers relative to UC.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“In conclusion, the CareSTEPS intervention significantly reduced caregiver depression, anxiety, and burden, relative to UC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- May combine two claims. 18
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCaregiver burden and poor mental health can adversely affect the caregiver's ability to provide quality care to the patient.
“This contributes to caregiver burden18 and poor mental health,19 which can adversely affect the caregiver’s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Wood, 2019, The humanistic burden of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Europe: a real-world survey linking patient clinical factors to patient and caregiver burden, Qual Life Res source
The Results (Humanistic burden on caregivers; page unavailable) report greater caregiver burden, activity impairment, and risk of depression as patients’ functional status declines. The paper does not assess whether caregiver burden or poor mental health reduces the quality of care provided to patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Cochrane, 2021, Variables associated with distress amongst informal caregivers of people with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature, Psychooncology source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationT-scores of 60 or more on PROMIS indicate moderate depression/anxiety in need for further psychological evaluation.
“T-scores of 60 or more indicate moderate depression/anxiety in need for further psychological evaluation.31, 32, 33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [32] Kroenke, 2020, Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials, J Affect Disord source
The Results section (page not available in our copy) identifies a PROMIS depression T-score of 60 as an approximate threshold for moderate depression, with 65 and 70 marking higher severity levels. The paper does not establish the same threshold for anxiety or say that a score of 60 or more requires further psychological evaluation; it discusses cut-points as aids to treatment decisions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Cheng, 2023, Interpretation of PROMIS depression and anxiety measures compared with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria in musculoskeletal patients, JB JS Open Access source
The Outcome Measures section says a PROMIS Depression or Anxiety score of 60 is unfavorable, and the Conclusions recommend using the measures to identify patients who may benefit from further mental health evaluation. But the paper does not define ≥60 as the threshold for moderate depression or anxiety or say that everyone at that score needs evaluation; its optimal screening cutoffs in these musculoskeletal patients were ≥53 for depression and ≥59 for anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCaregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared and lacking caregiving resources.
“Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Murray, 2002, Dying of lung cancer or cardiac failure: prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers in the community, Br Med J source
In “Living with illness” (page not specified), a lung-cancer carer worries about not knowing what to do when death occurs, supporting the feeling of being unprepared. “Service provision” (page not specified) says carer support and other services were usually available, though misunderstandings sometimes prevented access. It does not establish that lung-cancer caregivers generally lacked caregiving resources. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [12] Bakas, 2001, Caregiving tasks among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer, Oncol Nurs Forum
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe effect sizes for CareSTEPS are comparable to and exceed those reported in the broader literature on cancer caregivers.
“These effect sizes are comparable to and exceed those reported in the broader literature on cancer caregivers,21,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [21] Chow, 2023, Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
- cites [40] Cheng, 2022, Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions among caregivers of patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Nurs Stud source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationIf the goal of a trial is to see if an intervention is superior to existing practices, it must be compared with them.
“if the goal of a trial is to see if an intervention is superior to existing practices (in this case, UC), it must be compared with them.43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Freedland, 2011, Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions, Psychosom Med source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCareSTEPS reduced caregiver burden compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.37.
“Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data412 patients were screened; 78 were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria, primarily owing to lack of a caregiver or inability to contact the caregiver.
“The CONSORT diagram (Fig. 1) shows that 412 patients were screened. Seventy-eight were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, primarily owing to the lack of a caregiver or the research team’s inability to contact the caregiver to determine interest and eligibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn most cases, missed sessions were caused by conflicting demands or poor patient health.
“In most cases, missed sessions were caused by conflicting demands or poor patient health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCareSTEPS reduced anxiety symptoms compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.81.
“Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenRefusals were primarily owing to a lack of caregiver interest or availability.
“Refusals were primarily owing to a lack of caregiver interest or availability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataEmployed caregivers reported greater depression than those who were not employed.
“employed caregivers reported greater depression (M = 12.77, SD = 4.65) than those who were not employed (M = 11.35, SD = 4.46) (t = 1.97, p = 0.05)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-off for the PROMIS anxiety measure at baseline.
“27 (15.5%) and 60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-offs for the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data27 (15.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-off for the PROMIS depression measure at baseline.
“27 (15.5%) and 60 (34.5%) caregivers exceeded the cut-offs for the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSpouses/partners reported greater caregiver burden than sons/daughters and other family members.
“spouses/partners (M = 15.69, SD = 8.40) reported greater caregiver burden than sons/daughters (M = 14.71, SD = 9.28) and other family members (M = 11.44, SD = 8.00) (F = 2.97, p = 0.05)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 334 eligible caregivers, 187 (56%) consented.
“Of the 334 eligible caregivers, 187 (56%) consented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn most cases, lack of follow-up completion was caused by the patient entering hospice/dying (n = 15 of 34; 44%), the caregiver being too busy (n = 10; 29%), or the patient's poor health/death.
“In most cases, the lack of follow-up completion was caused by the patient entering hospice/dying (n = 15 of 34; 44%), the caregiver being too busy (n = 10; 29%), or the patient’s poor health/death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataCareSTEPS reduced depression symptoms compared with usual care at 8-week follow-up, with effect size d = −0.55.
“Caregivers who received CareSTEPS reported improved psychological functioning and lower burden compared with those who received usual care, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (depression d = −0.55, anxiety d = −0.81, burden d = −0.37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCaregivers who lived with the patient reported greater caregiver burden than those who did not live with the patient.
“caregivers who lived with the patient reported greater caregiver burden (M = 15.69, SD = 8.60) than those who did not live with the patient (M = 11.78, SD = 8.28; t = 2.67, p = 0.01)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study had 67% attendance and 50% homework completion rates.
“Despite positive evaluations, the 67% attendance and 50% homework completion rates reveal that caregivers struggled to consistently participate in the multisession intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome caregivers suggested choosing modules that addressed their caregiving challenges rather than completing the program to improve relevance and effectiveness.
“Others suggested choosing modules that addressed their caregiving challenges rather than completing the program to improve relevance and effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect size for the depression difference was Cohen's d = -0.55, a medium effect.
“The effect size for this difference (Cohen’s d) was −0.55, which is a medium effect,39 with an observed power of 0.91.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Cohen, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor caregivers meeting PROMIS depression criteria at baseline (N = 27), 40% in UC improved versus 83.3% in CareSTEPS, a significant difference (p = 0.047).
“For caregivers meeting PROMIS depression criteria at baseline (N = 27), six of the 15 (40%) in UC improved versus 10 of the 12 (83.3%) in CareSTEPS, showing a significant difference (p = 0.047, Fisher’s exact test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect size for the caregiver burden difference was -0.37, a small to medium effect.
“The effect size was −0.37, which was a small to medium effect with an observed power of 0.91.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect size for the anxiety difference was d = -0.81, a large effect.
“The effect size (d) was −0.81, which is a large effect, with an observed power of 0.99.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost caregivers enjoyed their participation, but some wanted more personalized sessions.
“Most caregivers enjoyed their participation, but some wanted more personalized sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants liked the program's convenience, usefulness, and relevance and praised the interventionists.
“Table 4 reports that participants liked the program's convenience, usefulness, and relevance and praised the interventionists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataNo statistically significant gender-based differences in distress were discovered.
“though no statistically significant gender-based differences in distress were discovered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe trial was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02414672).
“This multisite, open-label, individually randomized trial, approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02414672) was conducted between 2015 and 2021.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningData analysts were blinded to group assignments.
“Nevertheless, to maintain the integrity of the study results, the data analysts were blinded to group assignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenModel covariates were selected based on their association with study outcomes: continuous variables if significant at p < 0.05, categorical if mean differences significant at p < 0.05.
“Model covariates were selected on the basis of their association with the study outcomes. Continuous variables were included as covariates if they reported a significant association with the outcomes at a p value lower than 0.05. Similarly, categorical variables were incorporated as covariates when M differences in the outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for caregiver burden was 0.90 at T1 and 0.91 at T2.
“Cronbach’s α scores, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRandomization was stratified by histologic type, disease stage, and type of patient-caregiver relationship using a computer-generated schedule with random block sizes of two and four, maintaining a 1:1 allocation ratio within each stratum.
“Randomization was stratified by histologic type (NSCLC versus SCLC), disease stage (IIIB versus IV or advanced), and type of patient-caregiver relationship (spouse or partner versus other family members) using a computer-generated schedule with random block sizes of two and four, maintaining a 1:1 allocation ratio within each stratum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.
“Likewise, most educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.22,23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Bucher, 2001, Problem-solving cancer care education for patients and caregivers, Cancer Pract source
- cites [23] Thomas, 2015, The development and evaluation of a multimedia resource for family carers of patients receiving palliative care: a consumer-led project, Palliat Support Care source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThirteen consenting caregivers dropped out before returning to the baseline survey (passive refusal), leaving 174 who were randomized.
“Thirteen consenting caregivers dropped out before returning to the baseline survey (passive refusal), leaving 174 who were randomized (87 to CareSTEPS, 87 to UC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for anxiety was 0.89 at T1 and 0.90 at T2.
“In this study, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α) scores for depression, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively and the scores for anxiety, αT1 and αT2, were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOn average, caregivers completed 2.5 homework assignments (range 0-5).
“On average, caregivers completed 2.5 homework assignments (range 0–5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSelf-Determination Theory holds that meeting people's needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness is critical for psychological health and well-being.
“The program is grounded by Self-Determination Theory,29 which holds that meeting people’s needs for competence (self-efficacy), autonomy (choice and volition), and relatedness (belonging and connection) is critical for psychological health and well-being.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Deci, 2000, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychol Inq source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAnalyses of covariance were conducted with T1 scores as model covariates and T2 scores as outcomes.
“Analyses of covariance were conducted to assess the efficacy of CareSTEPS, with T1 scores as model covariates and T2 scores as outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAnalyses used an intent-to-treat framework.
“An intent-to-treat framework was implemented, and a two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) for depression was 0.90 at T1 and 0.91 at T2.
“In this study, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α) scores for depression, αT1 and αT2, were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively and the scores for anxiety, αT1 and αT2, were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFidelity was assessed by rating a random subset of 25% of digitally recorded sessions by two trained coders using a fidelity checklist.
“For each interventionist, a random subset of 25% of digitally recorded sessions were rated for fidelity by two trained coders. The fidelity checklist assessed whether session topics were covered and whether in-session exercises and homework were completed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSample size recalculation was conducted after 100 caregivers had been randomized (50 per arm) using actual attrition rates rather than pretrial estimates and without examining treatment effects.
“A sample size recalculation was conducted after 100 caregivers had been randomized (50 in each arm) using actual attrition rates rather than pretrial estimates and without examining treatment effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenMissing data were handled using multiple imputation methods.
“Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationThe most important factor in selecting a control condition is how well it fits the purpose of the trial.
“Because the most important factor in selecting a control condition is how well it fits the purpose of the trial,44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Wampold, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe observed power for the caregiver burden difference was 0.91.
“The effect size was −0.37, which was a small to medium effect with an observed power of 0.91.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe observed improvements may have been due to nonspecific effects because CareSTEPS was compared to usual care rather than an attention control condition.
“Given that we compared CareSTEPS to UC rather than an attention control condition, it is possible that the observed improvements were due to nonspecific effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTable 3 reports estimated marginal means for the primary and secondary outcomes, controlling for caregiver employment status, type of patient-caregiver relationship, and whether or not the caregiver lived with the patient.
“Table 3 reports the estimated marginal Ms for the primary and secondary outcomes, controlling for caregiver employment status, type of patient-caregiver relationship, and whether or not the caregiver lived with the patient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Burden difference is described as significant at baseline
MinorThe caregiver-burden result claims a significant between-group difference at T1, but the paper explicitly says there were no significant baseline differences by study arm. The reported treatment conclusion concerns follow-up rather than a baseline difference.
“At T1 there was a significant difference in caregiver burden (p < 0.0001), with the CareSTEPS group having lower M scores (less caregiver burden) than the UC group.”
“No significant baseline differences by study arm were found.”
Extensive-stage SCLC counts do not sum to the reported total
MinorTable 1 gives a full-sample count of 12 for extensive-stage SCLC, while the two study-arm counts sum to 32.
Reported 12 · recomputed 32
“| Extensive-stage SCLC | 12 (6.9) | 16 (18.4) | 16 (18.4) | | |”
Stage IIIB NSCLC counts do not sum to the reported total
MinorTable 1 gives a full-sample count of 32 for stage IIIB NSCLC, but lists only six caregivers in each arm.
Reported 32 · recomputed 12
“| Stage IIIB NSCLC | 32 (18.4) | 6 (6.9) | 6 (6.9) | | |”
Depression and anxiety cutoff excludes a score of 60 later in the paper
MinorThe measures section includes a T-score of 60 in the moderate depression/anxiety threshold, whereas the clinical-significance analysis defines high scores as strictly greater than 60.
“T-scores of 60 or more indicate moderate depression/anxiety in need for further psychological evaluation.”
“high levels of depression and anxiety (T-scores > 60 on the PROMIS measures)”
Non-cohabiting caregivers do not sum to the reported total
MinorTable 1 reports 46 caregivers not living with the patient, but its study-arm counts sum to 128. The totals appear reversed between the Yes and No rows.
Reported 46 · recomputed 128
“| No | 46 (26.4) | 66 (75.9) | 62 (71.3) | | |”
Moderate-burden cutoff excludes a score of 11 later in the paper
MinorThe measures section classifies a burden score of 11 as moderate, but the clinical-significance definition of moderate to high burden requires a score greater than 11.
“The scores 0 to 10 indicated no to mild burden, 11 to 20 indicated moderate burden, and higher than 20 indicated high burden.”
“moderate to high levels of caregiver burden (Zarit-12 scores > 11)”
Cohabiting caregivers do not sum to the reported total
MinorTable 1 reports 128 caregivers living with the patient, but its two study-arm counts sum to 46.
Reported 128 · recomputed 46
“| Yes | 128 (73.6) | 21 (24.1) | 25 (28.7) | | |”
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,588 · see citing works
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · cited 1× · see citing works
“28 The program is grounded by Self-Determination Theory, 29 which holds that meeting people ’ s needs for competence (self-ef fi cacy), autonomy (choice and volition), and relatedness (belonging and connection) is critical for psychological health and well-being.”
Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer
Mountain, C. F. (1997) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1378/chest.111.6.1710 · Cited by 4,565 · see citing works
FERRELL, B. R., Temel, J. S., Temin, S., Alesi, E. R., Balboni, T. A., Basch, E., Firn, J. I., Paice, J. A., Peppercorn, J. M., Phillips, T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.70.1474 · Cited by 2,148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“8 Although family support is deeply ingrained in palliative care philosophy, 9 real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.”
Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., Cella, D., & PROMIS Cooperative Group (2011) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191111411667 · Cited by 2,132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…was assessed using the six-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short-form for depression, which measures negative mood and views of the self, 30 and the six-item PROMIS short-form for anxiety, which measures fear, anxious misery (e.g., worry), and hyperarousal.”
The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models Methods and Findings
Horvath, A. O. (2002) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1093/ptr/12.1.108 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
Bédard, M., Molloy, D. W., Squire, L., Dubois, S., Lever, J. A., & O'Donnell, M. (2001) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/41.5.652 · Cited by 1,691 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The 12-item short form of the Zarit Burden interview 34 assesses personal and role strain.”
Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Song, L., Zhang, L., & Mood, D. W. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20081 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.4.331 · Cited by 761 · cited 1× · see citing works
“38 Finally, a post hoc, observed power analysis was conducted.”
Murray, S. A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7370.929 · Cited by 521 · cited 1× · see citing works
“10 Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources, 11,12 having low self-ef fi cacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing signi fi cant emotional distress, 13 – 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.”
Freedland, K. E., Mohr, D. C., Davidson, K. W., & Schwartz, J. E. (2011) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e318218e1fb · Cited by 369 · cited 1× · see citing works
“43 Because the most important factor in selecting a control condition is how well it fi ts the purpose of the trial, 44 and the goal of this trial was to push the envelope of ef fi cacy to achieve better outcomes for caregivers (rather than differentiate between speci fi c and nonspeci fi c effects),…”
Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: prevalence by cancer type
Brintzenhofe-Szoc, K. M., Levin, T. T., Li, Y., Kissane, D. W., & Zabora, J. R. (2009) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.383 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Comparability of Randomised Groups
Altman, D. G. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2987510 · Cited by 329 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To address potential baseline group imbalance, 37 sociodemographic and medical variables were examined.”
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1995) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(95)00056-5 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Palliative care for family caregivers
Alam, S., Hannon, B., & Zimmermann, C. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.00018 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
The cancer family caregiving experience: An updated and expanded conceptual model
Fletcher, B. S., Miaskowski, C. A., Given, B. A., & Schumacher, K. L. (2011) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2011.09.001 · Cited by 290 · cited 2× · see citing works
“22,23 Targeted interventions that provide caregivers with tools for effective caregiving is a more comprehensive approach that has great potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we developed CareSTEPS — an ac…”
Symptoms in Adults with Lung Cancer
Cooley, M. E. (2000) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00150-5 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Badr, H., Smith, C. B., Goldstein, N. E., Gomez, J. E., & Redd, W. H. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29009 · Cited by 214 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we developed CareSTEPS — an acronym for six domains that are central to the caregiving role (Self-Care, Stress management, Symptom management,…”
Self-citationMilbury, K., Badr, H., Fossella, F., Pisters, K., & Carmack, C. (2013) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1795-6 · Cited by 178 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we developed CareSTEPS — an acronym for six domains that are central to the caregiving role (Self-Care, Stress management, Symptom management,…”
Self-citationFujinami, R., Sun, V., Zachariah, F., Uman, G., Grant, M., & Ferrell, B. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3562 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6,16,17 This contributes to caregiver burden 18 and poor mental health, 19 which can adversely affect the caregiver ’ s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Chen, C. X., Kean, J., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., Krebs, E. E., & Monahan, P. O. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Carmack Taylor, C. L., Badr, H., Lee, J. H., Fossella, F., Pisters, K., Gritz, E. R., & Schover, L. (2008) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9062-7 · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“10 Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources, 11,12 having low self-ef fi cacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing signi fi cant emotional distress, 13 – 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.”
Self-citationInterventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis
Chow, R., Mathews, J. J., Cheng, E. Y., Lo, S., Wong, J., Alam, S., Hannon, B., Rodin, G., Nissim, R., Hales, S., et al. (2023) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djad075 · Cited by 98 · cited 2× · see citing works
“21 This highlights a signi fi cant gap in interventions tailored to the unique challenges faced by this group, who are managing palliative treatment rather than end-of-life care.”
Patient-Centered Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
Temel, J. S., Petrillo, L. A., & Greer, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01710 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention
Northouse, L. L., Rosset, T., Phillips, L., Mood, D., Schafenacker, A., & Kershaw, T. (2006) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20128 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Problem-solving cancer care education for patients and caregivers
Bucher, J. A., Loscalzo, M., Zabora, J., Houts, P. S., Hooker, C., & BrintzenhofeSzoc, K. (2001) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.009002066.x · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“22,23 Targeted interventions that provide caregivers with tools for effective caregiving is a more comprehensive approach that has great potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we…”
O'Toole, M. S., Zachariae, R., Renna, M. E., Mennin, D. S., & Applebaum, A. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4144 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“35,36”
Cheng, Q., Xu, B., Ng, M. S. N., Duan, Y., & So, W. K. W. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104162 · Cited by 83 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These effect sizes are comparable to and exceed those reported in the broader literature on cancer caregivers, 21,40 and suggest that CareSTEPS is a promising approach for supporting caregivers in the setting of advanced LC. Findings also provide compelling evidence for incorporating interventions…”
Chua, G. P., Pang, G. S. Y., Yee, A. C. P., Neo, P. S. H., Zhou, S., Lim, C., Wong, Y. Y., Qu, D. L., Pan, F. T., & Yang, G. M. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07239-9 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“20 While numerous interventions have been tested for cancer caregivers, interventions speci fi cally addressing the needs of advanced LC caregivers in the outpatient setting remain limited.”
Resilience in advanced cancer caregiving. A systematic review and meta-synthesis
Opsomer, S., Lauwerier, E., Lepeleire, J. D., & Pype, P. F. (2022) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163211057749 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Lee, Y., Liao, Y., Shun, S., Lin, K., Liao, W., Chang, P., Jhang, S., Yu, C., Yang, P., Hsieh, P., et al. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4678 · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6,16,17 This contributes to caregiver burden 18 and poor mental health, 19 which can adversely affect the caregiver ’ s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of lung cancer patients: a systematic review
Kedia, S. K., Collins, A., Dillon, P. J., Akkus, C., Ward, K. D., & Jackson, B. M. (2020) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5271 · Cited by 51 · cited 2× · see citing works
“6,16,17 This contributes to caregiver burden 18 and poor mental health, 19 which can adversely affect the caregiver ’ s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Wood, R., Taylor-Stokes, G., Smith, F., & Chaib, C. (2019) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02152-6 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6,16,17 This contributes to caregiver burden 18 and poor mental health, 19 which can adversely affect the caregiver ’ s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Shaw, J. M., Young, J. M., Butow, P. N., Badgery-Parker, T., Durcinoska, I., Harrison, J. D., Davidson, P. M., Martin, D., Sandroussi, C., Hollands, M., et al. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2817-3 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“41,42 The predominance of female caregivers, which is consistent with broader caregiver demographics, may limit generalizability to male caregivers, though no statistically signi fi cant gender-based differences in distress were discovered.”
Family Functioning and Its Implications for Palliative Care
Davies, B. I., Reimer, J. C., & Martens, N. (1994) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/082585979401000108 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“8 Although family support is deeply ingrained in palliative care philosophy, 9 real-world support for caregivers is frequently lacking, even when acknowledged.”
Cochrane, A., Reid, O., Woods, S., Gallagher, P., & Dunne, S. (2021) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5694 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6,16,17 This contributes to caregiver burden 18 and poor mental health, 19 which can adversely affect the caregiver ’ s ability to provide quality care to the patient.”
Mosher, C. E., Ott, M., Hanna, N., Jalal, S., & Champion, V. (2017) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000350 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“28 The program is grounded by Self-Determination Theory, 29 which holds that meeting people ’ s needs for competence (self-ef fi cacy), autonomy (choice and volition), and relatedness (belonging and connection) is critical for psychological health and well-being.”
Cheng, A. L., Downs, D. L., Brady, B. K., Hong, B. A., Park, P., Prather, H., & Hunt, D. M. (2023) · JBJS Open Access · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00110 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“33 In this study, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach ’ s a ) scores for depression, a T1 and a T2 , were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively and the scores for anxiety, a T1 and a T2 , were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively.”
InfluentialThomas, K., & Moore, G. (2015) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951513001090 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“22,23 Targeted interventions that provide caregivers with tools for effective caregiving is a more comprehensive approach that has great potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we…”
The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site
Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studts, J. L., Carter‐Harris, L., Hamann, H. A., Smith, R. A., Kazerooni, E. A., Rosenthal, L. S., & for the Stigma and Nihilism Task Group of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35969 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“90–94 Next steps Given the recent structural changes within the task group structure, the SNTG has formally transitioned responsibility for lung cancer survivorship initiatives to the newly established STG.”
Azcárate‐Cenoz, N., Alfaro‐Díaz, C., Perea, A. O., Ramírez, M. Á. S., Gil, C. A., Murillo, P. B., & Esandi, N. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.70215 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Family support interventions have shown potential to strengthen family relationships and reduce the need to hide emotions and concerns [46, 47].”
Milbury, K., Chen, A., Li, Y., Liao, Z. X., Whisenant, M., Mama, S. K., Bentley, J. R., Shannon, V. R., Yousuf, S., Silva, R. F., et al. (2026) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op-25-01079
Self-citationSaadatmand, V., & Hojat, M. (2026) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-11010-4
Domains of Family Empowerment for Self-Management in Palliative Care: A Scoping Review
Dewi, R. I. S., Fatmawati, K. A., Mulyana, B., & Astrada, A. (2026) · Journal of Palliative Care · doi:10.1177/08258597261474564
- Authors
- Rangel, M. L., Milbury, K., Kayser, K., Ripley, R. T., Kvale, E., & Badr, H.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badr, Hoda
- Venue
- JTO Clinical and Research Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 100736
- ISSN
- 2666-3643 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11583704
- OpenAlex
- W4403509041
- Semantic Scholar
- 75b761b54d0a46a82b3c5c1a3c90d0331fb0ed6f
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JTO Clinical and Research Reports (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01 CA187143)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- family caregivers, advanced lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, telephone-delivered intervention, psychoeducation, stress management, symptom management, social support, caregiver support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review