Cited by 35Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

Predictors of long-term distress in female partners of men diagnosed with prostate cancer

Open access
Hyde, Melissa K., Legg, Melissa, Occhipinti, Stefano, Lepore, Stephen J., Ugalde, Anna, Zajdlewicz, Leah, Laurie, Kirstyn, Dunn, Jeff +1 more·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective Female partners of men with prostate cancer (PCa) experience heightened psychological distress; however, long-term distress for this group is not well described. We examined partner's psychological and cancer-specific distress over 2 years and predictors of change. Methods A cohort of 427 female partners (63% response; mean age 62.6 y) of PCa survivors completed baseline (2-4 y post-PCa treatment) assessments of anxiety, depression, and cancer-specific distress and were followed up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Caregiver burden, threat and challenge appraisal, self-efficacy, and dyadic adjustment were assessed as potential predictors of distress. Results Over time, 23% to 25% of women reported anxiety; 8% to 11% depression; 5% to 6% high cancer-specific distress. Higher caregiver burden and more threat appraisals were associated with increased distress, anxiety, depression, and cancer-specific distress over time. Higher dyadic adjustment over time and more challenge appraisals at 24 months were associated with less distress, anxiety, and depression. Increased partner self-efficacy was associated with lower distress and depression at baseline. Conclusions A substantial subgroup of partners experience ongoing anxiety, with depression less prevalent but also persistent. Caregiver burden, partner self-efficacy, threat, and challenge appraisals present as potential supportive care targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4617

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 10 studies emphasized the need of enhancing social support by reinforcing support networks and facilitating access to support groups and associations.

    “Among the strategies described, 10 studies [28,29,31,32,36,39,41,50,54,57] emphasized the need of enhancing social support by means of reinforcing the support networks and facilitating access to support groups and associations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyde, M. K., Legg, M., Occhipinti, S., Lepore, S. J., Ugalde, A., Zajdlewicz, L., Laurie, K., Dunn, J., & Chambers, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Cancer Council Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Chambers, Suzanne K.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-26
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
946-954
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2778494336
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (ID496001)
  • Cancer Council Queensland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
prostate cancer, female partners, caregiver burden, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, cancer-specific distress, threat appraisal, challenge appraisal, self-efficacy, dyadic adjustment, long-term outcomes, supportive care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review