Cited by 68Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Trajectories of caregiver burden and related factors in family caregivers of patients with lung cancer

Lee, Yun‐Hsiang, Liao, Yu‐Chien, Shun, Shiow‐Ching, Lin, Kuan‐Chia, Liao, Wei‐Yu, Chang, Pi‐Hua, Jhang, Sin‐Yuan, Yu, Chong‐Jen +3 more·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to (1) identify the changes of 5 domains of family caregiver (FC) burden, overall burden, and its subtrajectories when caring for newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patients during the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis; and (2) identify the FC-related and patient-related factors most associated with the overall FC burden and each of its subtrajectories. Methods A total of 150 newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patient-FC dyads were recruited from a Taiwanese medical center. The overall FC burden was evaluated 4 times: before treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The potential subtrajectory of the caregiver burden was investigated by latent class growth analysis. The FC-related and patient-related factors having the greatest effect on the overall FC burden and its subtrajectories over time were identified by generalized estimating equations. Results The highest level of burden domain was "Impact on daily schedule" over time. Generally, most of the FC reported a moderate level of overall burden over the investigation period. Three subtrajectories of the overall FC burden over time (% caregivers) were identified: high burden (34.7%), moderate burden (56.0%), and low burden (9.3%), respectively. The self-efficacy of FC was the strongest factor related to the changes of the FC's burden and burden in each subtrajectory. Conclusion The results support the existing and different types of subtrajectories of the FC's burden. Health ca…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4678

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 68

Authors
Lee, Y., Liao, Y., Shun, S., Lin, K., Liao, W., Chang, P., Jhang, S., Yu, C., Yang, P., Hsieh, P., & Lai, Y.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Yuanpei University (TW)
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Lai, Yeur‐Hur
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-30
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1493-1500
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2792486804
Cited by
68
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-EX-100-980)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
caregiver burden, family caregivers, advanced lung cancer, newly diagnosed cancer, latent class growth analysis, caregiver self-efficacy, patient factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Taiwan, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review