Trajectories of caregiver burden and related factors in family caregivers of patients with lung cancer
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to (1) identify the changes of 5 domains of family caregiver (FC) burden, overall burden, and its subtrajectories when caring for newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patients during the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis; and (2) identify the FC-related and patient-related factors most associated with the overall FC burden and each of its subtrajectories. Methods A total of 150 newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patient-FC dyads were recruited from a Taiwanese medical center. The overall FC burden was evaluated 4 times: before treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The potential subtrajectory of the caregiver burden was investigated by latent class growth analysis. The FC-related and patient-related factors having the greatest effect on the overall FC burden and its subtrajectories over time were identified by generalized estimating equations. Results The highest level of burden domain was "Impact on daily schedule" over time. Generally, most of the FC reported a moderate level of overall burden over the investigation period. Three subtrajectories of the overall FC burden over time (% caregivers) were identified: high burden (34.7%), moderate burden (56.0%), and low burden (9.3%), respectively. The self-efficacy of FC was the strongest factor related to the changes of the FC's burden and burden in each subtrajectory. Conclusion The results support the existing and different types of subtrajectories of the FC's burden. Health ca…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers of patients with LC report receiving minimal psychosocial care.
“Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”
From Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Lee, Y., Liao, Y., Shun, S., Lin, K., Liao, W., Chang, P., Jhang, S., Yu, C., Yang, P., Hsieh, P., & Lai, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Yuanpei University (TW)
- National Yang Ming University (TW)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lai, Yeur‐Hur
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-30
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1493-1500
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W2792486804
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-EX-100-980)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, family caregivers, advanced lung cancer, newly diagnosed cancer, latent class growth analysis, caregiver self-efficacy, patient factors
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Taiwan, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review