Cited by 28Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Caring for the person with cancer: Information and support needs and the role of technology

Open access
Heynsbergh, Natalie, Botti, Mari, Heckel, Leila, Livingston, Patricia M.·2018·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Informal carers experience a variety of information and support needs when providing care to someone with cancer. It is unclear when carers seek information and what resources they access to support themselves throughout the cancer trajectory. Methods: A sample of 45 carers and 15 oncology nurses were recruited to participate in either focus groups or phone interviews. Results: Carers in the study were more likely to be women (60%), caring for a spouse or partner (64.4%), living with the patient (86.7%), and hold a university degree (46.7%). The majority of oncology nurses were females (66.6%). Findings showed that carers had limited access to adequate information as needs arose. Supports used to address information needs included information booklets, the Internet, and communication with healthcare professionals or with other carers. Barriers in communication between nurses and carers impacted on the adequacy of information received. Participants reported that technology, such as smartphone applications, might be appropriate for improving information and support needs. Conclusions: Caring for someone with cancer is multifaceted. Carers need access to timely information to help them effectively manage patients' needs. Future studies should assess the role of contemporary approaches, such as digital technology, as a solution to the delivery of information and support for carers of people with cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.4722

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heynsbergh, N., Botti, M., Heckel, L., & Livingston, P. M.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Heynsbergh, Natalie
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1650-1655
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2796043198
Cited by
28
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Eastern Health Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
informal caregivers, cancer caregiving, information needs, caregiver support, oncology nurses, digital health technologies, mobile application, information barriers
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Communication, Empathy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Social Support, Caregivers, Internet, Information Dissemination, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review