The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives
Abstract
This study assessed patient awareness and use—as well as obstacles to use—of HMO‐ and community‐based psychosocial support services designed for cancer patients. Participants were a randomly selected group of patients from a large Northwest HMO, with breast (N=145), prostate (N=151), or colon cancer (N=72), and their oncology and urology providers (N=29). Patient awareness was highest for HMO‐based services (68–90%) and lower for community‐ (33%) or Internet‐based (10–14%) services, and use rates were low across all services (range 2–8%). Providers reported referring 70% of their patients to HMO cancer support services, but their estimates of actual patient use of these services (40%) were inflated. Providers reported few barriers to referring patients to support services. The most commonly reported patient barriers to using such services were already having adequate support, lack of awareness of the service, and lack of provider referral. Results of regression analyses suggest that education, physician referral, social support, and spirituality may be important influences on use of cancer support services. This study takes a first step toward understanding patient use of existing cancer support services and suggests ways to increase participation in these services. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER
Spiegel, D., Kraemer, H., Bloom, J., & Gottheil, E. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91551-1 · Cited by 2,353
Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985) · Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_5 · Cited by 2,296 · cited 2×
“The eight-item Social Support: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) (Cohen et al., 1985) was used to assess the perceived availability of four types of social support: (1) ‘appraisal’—someone to talk to about problems, (2) ‘belonging’—people with whom to do things, (3) ‘tangible’—material…”
MethodMeyer, T. J., & Mark, M. M. (1995) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.101 · Cited by 689
Cited by
Mehnert, A., & Koch, U. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.005 · Cited by 473
Mehnert, A., Müller, D., Lehmann, C., & Koch, U. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213 · Cited by 440
Tuinman, M. A., Gazendam‐Donofrio, S. M., & Hoekstra‐Weebers, J. E. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23622 · Cited by 404
Graves, K. D., Arnold, S. M., Love, C. L., Kirsh, K. L., Moore, P. G., & Passik, S. D. (2007) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.10.001 · Cited by 338
Dilworth, S., Higgins, I., Parker, V., Kelly, B., & Turner, J. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3474 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Eakin, E. G., & Strycker, L. A.
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-113
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- OpenAlex
- W1479827133
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pon.500
- The paper
- Eakin, E. G., & Strycker, L. A. (2001). Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psycho-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.