Cited by 39Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

The Mediating Role of Avoidant Coping in the Relationships between Physical, Psychological, and Social Wellbeing and Distress in Breast Cancer Survivors

Open access
Cohee, Andrea, Johns, Shelley A., Alwine, Jennifer S., Talib, Tasneem, Monahan, Patrick O., Stump, Timothy E., Cella, David, Champion, Victoria L.·2021·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Many breast cancer survivors (BCSs) recover from the negative sequelae of cancer treatment. However, some report persistent and disruptive distress well into disease‐free survivorship. More information is needed on the predictors of distress in this growing population of BCS, including the role of avoidant coping, or attempts to avoid thoughts, feelings, and reminders of cancer, in mediating the relationship between distress and psychological, physical, and social domains of well‐being. Methods: In a large cross‐sectional study, BCS ( n = 1,127), who were 3 to 8 years post‐diagnosis, completed a survey assessing demographic characteristics, medical history, distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms), avoidant coping, and physical (fatigue), psychological (fear of recurrence, attention, body image), and social (social support from a partner, social constraints from a partner) well‐being. Multiple mediation analyses were conducted to determine if avoidant coping mediated the relationship between each distress variable (anxiety and depressive symptoms) and each well‐being (fear of recurrence, attention, body image, fatigue, social support, and social constraints) variable. Results: In all six mediation models, avoidant coping significantly ( p < 0 . 001) mediated the relationship between each well‐being variable (fear of recurrence, attention, body image, fatigue, social support, and social constraints) and each distress indicator (depression and anxiety). Avoidant coping mediated 19%–54% of the effects of the contributing factors on the distress variables. Conclusions: Avoidant coping may indicate risk for, or presence of, distress among BCS. Interventions to reduce distress may benefit from addressing avoidant coping styles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5663

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adoption of passive or avoidant coping strategies has a negative impact on breast cancer survivors' quality of life, influencing psychological distress and depression.

    “Other studies showed that the adoption of passive or avoidant coping strategies could have a negative impact on breast cancer survivors’ quality of life [62,63] influencing psychological distress [64,65], and depression [66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
  2. [19]Lepore S, Ituarte P. Optimism about cancer enhances mood by reducing negative social relations. Cancer Research, Therapy & Control. 1999; 8: 165– 174.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohee, A., Johns, S. A., Alwine, J. S., Talib, T., Monahan, P. O., Stump, T. E., Cella, D., & Champion, V. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohee, Andrea
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-31
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1129-1136
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W3137746355
Cited by
39
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, avoidance coping, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, body image, fatigue, social support, social constraints, mediation, well-being
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review