Cited by 11Women's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of psychosocial variables in breast self-examination practice: results from focus group discussions in Surabaya, Indonesia

Open access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is a global life-threatening disease. Breast self-examination (BSE) followed by timely diagnosis and treatment is a viable screening method for populations with limited health care access such as Indonesia. Knowledge of the beliefs underlying BSE could benefit the development of future health education efforts to promote BSE and breast cancer awareness among Indonesian women, with the ultimate aim to achieve early detection and promote long-term survivals. The purpose of this study was to explore the underlying beliefs of BSE among women in Surabaya, Indonesia in accordance with the reasoned action approach (RAA) framework. Moreover, we investigated what these women considered an effective approach to improve breast awareness and promote BSE in their social networks. METHOD: The participants included 62 women aged 18-55 (M = 32,9) in Surabaya, Indonesia who were divided into nine focus groups. Directed content analysis was employed to analyze the data. RESULTS: Six psychosocial determinants of performing BSE emerged from the analysis: knowledge, attitude and beliefs, risk perception, norms, perceived behavior control, and intention. Furthermore, the participants identified face-to-face meetings with visual media and healthcare professionals as effective channels to enhance breast awareness. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the application of the RAA for BSE, and reveals the importance of face-to-face meetings involving healthcare professionals and women's social networks for breast education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.5905

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various social media outlets can raise the degree of health promotion and awareness across multiple health topics.

    “The included research showed that various social media outlets could raise the degree of women's health promotion [25], awareness of menstrual hygiene, understanding of breast cancer awareness [26], breastfeeding techniques [27]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. IARC, 2018, Latest Global Cancer Data: Cancer Burden Rises to 18.1 Million New Cases and 9.6 Million Cancer Deaths in 2018
  2. IARC, Indonesia Fact Sheet 2020
  3. American Cancer Society, Survival Rates for Breast Cancer
  4. PDQ® Screening and Prevention Editorial Board, 2020, PDQ Cancer Screening Overview
  5. Ministry of Health Republic Indonesia, 2015, Manual Book for National Movement of Cervical and Breast Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Program [Internet]
  6. American Cancer Society, ACS Breast Cancer Early Detection Recommendations
  7. Ministry of Health RI, 2018, Indonesia Health Profile 2017
  8. Surabaya Health Office, 2015, Profil Kesehatan Kota Surabaya [Surabaya Health Profile]
  9. Regional WHO, Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Guidelines for the Early Detection and Screening of Breast Cancer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dewi, T. K., Ruiter, R. A. C., Ardi, R., & Massar, K.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Airlangga (ID)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Dewi, Triana Kesuma
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-02
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1169-1177
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W4213341411
Cited by
11
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
breast self-examination, breast cancer screening, psychosocial factors, reasoned action approach, health beliefs, breast awareness, social networks, health education, women's health, risk perception, perceived behavioral control, Surabaya
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Indonesia, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Breast Self-Examination, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review